--- On Tue, 8/28/12, Alliance for Natural Health USA <c+aahf@trusted-sender.convio.net> wrote:
|
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Fw: Ooh, Scary! USDA Wants to Protect Us from Raw Almonds
Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Mexican police officers detained over shooting of U.S. diplomatic vehicle - CNN.com
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monday, August 27, 2012
Fw: God's Accuracy ***HOW GREAT IS OUR GOD***GOD'S PERFECT TIMING
|
Sunday, August 26, 2012
Gabrielle Swainson: Missing since 8/16/2012
Please pray for the safe return of this girl.
http://thecomingcrisis.blogspot.com/2012/08/gabrielle-swainson-vanished-from-her.html
http://thecomingcrisis.blogspot.com/2012/08/gabrielle-swainson-vanished-from-her.html
Thursday, August 23, 2012
Two State Solution An End To Israel?
Two State Solution An End Israel, And the RNC?
By: Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News US Correspondent
The Republican Party has taken a stupid pill. They have decided to endorse a two-state solution for peace in the Middle East, a decision fatal both for Israel and the Republican Party. Batten down the hatches, Hurricane Isaac is coming to the RNC.
The reason I brought up Hurricane Isaac (which is English for Yitzhak, a Hebrew word meaning 'laughter') is because of another situation with hurricanes and politics.
In 1989, a very powerful hurricane called Hugo was moving up the eastern American seaboard. At that same time, then-Senator 'Fritz' Hollings of South Carolina was scheduled to vote on the abortion issue. Sen. Hollings had previously been on record stating that he would vote against abortion in this situation. Well, he lied.
Hurricane Hugo was expected to pass up the coast of South Carolina and make landfall further north. When it reached the area of Charleston, it made a right-hand turn and headed out to sea and stalled. Sen. Hollings was scheduled to vote on abortion at 8:00 PM local time. When the vote was over, Sen. Hollings stated that he had voted in favor of abortion. Big mistake.
At the same time that Senator Hollings announced what he had done, Hurricane Hugo started to move straight for Charleston. 107 people died, over $10 Billion US in damages, many homes damaged or destroyed, including one recently built by Fritz Hollings. If Sen. Hollings had kept his word and voted against abortion like he had promised, Hugo would never have hit South Carolina
The platform committee, meeting in Tampa, Florida (the word Florida means "flowering Jew") on Tuesday, rejected three amendments that would have removed language supportive of a two-state solution, according to a delegate who put forward two of them.
The problem with a two-state solution is that it is doomed to failure. It is not the issue of enough land; if it were that, the Arabs could easily move back to their countries of origin where there is more than enough land to house them. The problem is spirituality.
The proposed language of the Republican Party platform as it stands now, which was written by the Romney campaign and committee aides, reads, "We envision two democratic states," according to BuzzFeed, the political news site that first reported on the amendments.
Two of the three amendments excluding the two-state solution language were offered by Kevin Erickson, pastor at Cross Hill Church, and delegate, in Virginia, MN. He wanted them to contain language that was tough on terrorism, but they were not adopted following objections from Senator Jim Talent, Republican from Missouri, according to the report.
Another problem with a two-state solution is that it requires Israel to give up land that it rightly and rightfully has in exchange for peace. This is equivalent to giving the school bully your lunch money for him not to beat you up. It will only work for so long.
Erickson, a former public defender, told JTA that Israel "is not one of my primary issues.
He said he was intrigued after listening to a "pretty vigorous" discussion about a two-state solution that ended in "such a close vote." He proposed alternatives that were designed to satisfy both sides, but these were defeated as well.
A liberal pro-Israel group called J Street welcomed the result.
"That such amendments could garner even a modicum of support demonstrates the very real threat to longstanding bipartisan support for the two-state resolution as a central feature of America's unwavering commitment to Israel's survival and security as the democratic homeland of the Jewish people," it said in a statement.
Anyone that offers a two-state solution on the issue of peace in the Middle East flies in the face of both history and the holy scriptures. At best, the Muslims can only offer a 'hudna,' which is a temporary treaty permitted in the Qu'ran in order to allow defeated Islamic forces to replenish themselves and re-arm in order to attack again. This makes real and lasting peace with Islam impossible.
Many Israelis would not mind the Palestinians having their own state, just not by giving up their homeland. Beware anyone who offers a two-state solution for peace between Israel and the Muslim world. The person might be well-meaning, but is recommending Israel eat a poisonous mushroom. Unless the LORD deliver Israel, it will be fatal.
(Information for this article was taken from www.worthynews.com and www.timesofisrael.com.)
UPDATE: It appears that God did not wish for the Republican National Convention to be hit with Isaac, whether he be a hurricane or otherwise. Blessed be the name of the LORD. Many people were saved potentially.
Wednesday, August 22, 2012
A dailymail.co.uk article from Marshall Ramsey II
Looks like more fake Mars photos for us to look at.
Did NASA discover life on Mars... 36 years ago?
MICHAEL HANLON: In New Scientist this month it was reported that Gilbert Levin, a former NASA scientist, is restating his claim that the mission he worked on, Viking, did discover life on Mars way back in the 1970s.
Full Story:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2191650/Curiosity-Did-NASA-discover-life-Mars--36-years-ago.html
22 August 2012
www.dailymail.co.uk
Traitors In The House of Judah?
Traitors In The House of Judah?
By: Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News US Correspondent
JERUSALEM, Israel - This is an uncomfortable article to write. Information I have seen over the past few days, and knowing what is in the heart of President Obama (I am an American), I have reason to believe that there may be traitors to Israel that are Israeli.
In an article published by DEBKAfile on 13 Aug, 2012, Ex-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert addressed students in Tel-Aviv on Iran's nuclear program.
"Iran's nuclear program has not reached the threshold necessitating Israeli action now or in the near future," he said. He further stated that Israel's "defense leaders" don't subscribe to the view that "action now is unavoidable."
Mr. Olmert has apparently not had access to regular intelligence briefings on Iran, says the DEBKAfile report. Also brought up in the report is the time when Mr. Olmert approved an Israeli strike for destroying a nuclear reactor under construction by Iran and North Korea in northern Syria in September 2007.
He stated then that Iran was "years away from accumulating enough enriched uranium and the capability to build nuclear warheads." Both Israeli and US intelligence reports agree that Iran will have them within a matter of weeks.
Mr. Olmert in 2009 resigned from his post as Prime Minister of Israel due to a corruption scandal. The question that must be asked is this: If then-Prime Minister Olmert had less information to go on than today, and yet had enough to launch a strike against a Syrian nuclear processing facility, why then does he say that Iran is years away from acquiring the necessary materials and technical expertise required to build a nuclear weapon? Perhaps he is secretly on the side of the Iranians? In any case, Israel cannot afford to wait any longer.
Anyone who knows me knows that I am pro-Israel. They are my LORD's people, and I love them very much. I have also recently been able to trace out my genealogy and find out that I am a direct male descendant of the tribe of Judah through his son Zarah. My heart almost exploded for joy and excitement when I found this out.
Making this accusation is not a light thing for me. I almost didn't make it because I didn't want to accuse a Jew falsely. You are my family.
But lest anyone think that I am speaking only against Israelis let me refer you to a couple of stories I recently posted on my blog: http://conspiracyprophecyguy.blogspot.com/2012/08/president-obama-supplying-weapons-to.html, http://conspiracyprophecyguy.blogspot.com/2012/08/is-united-states-helping-iran-to-get.html. In them I lay out a case where America is proven to be on the side of by the Syrians and the Iranians, two nations that hate Israel.
And if those two were not enough, check out this website: http://fcnl.org/issues/iran/us_israeli_security_officials_warn_against_war_with_iran/. It has a list of about twenty different people, both American and Israeli, most of them appear to be on the side of Iran. The overall content of the statements can be summed up in this, "We shouldn't attack Iran because they might attack back, and we think they could whip us." Either they are on the side of Iran, or they are cowards. Personally, I think they are on the side of Iran and being paid well for it.
Mr. Netanyahu, Mr. Barak, the time to strike is now. Do not wait for international support, nor Israeli 'top advisors' support, nor yet for American support. The IDF stand ready to follow you into battle. Y-H-V-H is with you on this to attack. He has sent his angels before you. Do not fear what Iran might do in retaliation, for you know they will retaliate. Defend your people before Iran does hit Israel with a nuke.
President Obama Supplying Weapons To Syrian Rebels For Use Against Israel?
By: Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News US Correspondent
(Information for this article is from www.rt.com and published on 06/21/2012)
TEL-AVIV, Israel - American secret service operatives are delivering anti-tank rocket launchers, illegal assault rifles, and ammunition to Syrian opposition forces, according to a report issued by the New York Times.
According to the report, American (C.I.A.) officers based in Turkey have supervised the flow of illegal arms for weeks to numerous opposition factions, supposedly for use against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. They are being brought into Syria over the Turkish border with help from Muslim Brotherhood members operating in Syria. Expenses (for the weapons?) are being shared by Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar.
The source of the New York Times report is an Arab intelligence official According to the source, the officers are collecting information on Syrian opposition groups and recruiting informants among their ranks.
The Obama administration is reported to be considering sharing its intelligence data (no mention of with whom), satellite images and detailed information on the location and maneuvers of Syrian troops. The State Department has also reportedly set aside $15 million in medical supplies and communication equipment for anti-Assad opposition groups.
While it would seem that President Obama is trying to help the rebels overthrow President Assad, we must remember that in the past he has supported known enemies of Israel like Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad in his violent suppression of the citizens of Iran protesting for more rights and freedom (his unwillingness to even voice sympathy for the people of Iran should be seen as support for Ahmedinejad and his actions), and the Muslim Brotherhood in their overthrow of former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak. President Obama supported them in this by sending military aid and using NATO bombing runs against Mubarak and his army. Both of these groups have the express intent of destroying Israel.
President Obama is not alone in his desire to destroy Israel. Russia, while not assisting the rebels, is supplying the nation of Syria with material and technical support in the form of maintenance of Syria's MI-25 assault helicopters and anti-air missile systems. Since the rebels have no air assault capabilities, the only reason for Syria having anti-air missile systems is to sue against Israeli jets and attack helicopters.
Reportedly, the US Pentagon is considering establishing a no-fly zone over Syria, as was done in Libya and Iraq. This is nothing more than posturing on the part of the United States, the sole purpose of which is to lull Israel into its confidence to make them more vulnerable to attack by Syria, Iran, Russia, or some faction like al-Qaeda and Hezbollah. The only purpose for a no-fly zone in Syria must be to attack Israeli military aircraft that might enter Syrian airspace since the Syrian rebel groups, again, have no air assault vehicles.
Recent (as of August 19, 2012) statements by Assad threatening to expand the civil war beyond its borders if Western military action against Syria happens is nothing but a veiled, yet direct, threat against Israel.
Israel should not listen to anyone telling them when to attack, as in an 'October Surprise'. You know what you have to do. Do it, and may the LORD God of Abraham, Isaac, and Israel be with you.
(Information for this article is from www.rt.com and published on 06/21/2012)
TEL-AVIV, Israel - American secret service operatives are delivering anti-tank rocket launchers, illegal assault rifles, and ammunition to Syrian opposition forces, according to a report issued by the New York Times.
According to the report, American (C.I.A.) officers based in Turkey have supervised the flow of illegal arms for weeks to numerous opposition factions, supposedly for use against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. They are being brought into Syria over the Turkish border with help from Muslim Brotherhood members operating in Syria. Expenses (for the weapons?) are being shared by Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar.
The source of the New York Times report is an Arab intelligence official According to the source, the officers are collecting information on Syrian opposition groups and recruiting informants among their ranks.
The Obama administration is reported to be considering sharing its intelligence data (no mention of with whom), satellite images and detailed information on the location and maneuvers of Syrian troops. The State Department has also reportedly set aside $15 million in medical supplies and communication equipment for anti-Assad opposition groups.
While it would seem that President Obama is trying to help the rebels overthrow President Assad, we must remember that in the past he has supported known enemies of Israel like Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad in his violent suppression of the citizens of Iran protesting for more rights and freedom (his unwillingness to even voice sympathy for the people of Iran should be seen as support for Ahmedinejad and his actions), and the Muslim Brotherhood in their overthrow of former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak. President Obama supported them in this by sending military aid and using NATO bombing runs against Mubarak and his army. Both of these groups have the express intent of destroying Israel.
President Obama is not alone in his desire to destroy Israel. Russia, while not assisting the rebels, is supplying the nation of Syria with material and technical support in the form of maintenance of Syria's MI-25 assault helicopters and anti-air missile systems. Since the rebels have no air assault capabilities, the only reason for Syria having anti-air missile systems is to sue against Israeli jets and attack helicopters.
Reportedly, the US Pentagon is considering establishing a no-fly zone over Syria, as was done in Libya and Iraq. This is nothing more than posturing on the part of the United States, the sole purpose of which is to lull Israel into its confidence to make them more vulnerable to attack by Syria, Iran, Russia, or some faction like al-Qaeda and Hezbollah. The only purpose for a no-fly zone in Syria must be to attack Israeli military aircraft that might enter Syrian airspace since the Syrian rebel groups, again, have no air assault vehicles.
Recent (as of August 19, 2012) statements by Assad threatening to expand the civil war beyond its borders if Western military action against Syria happens is nothing but a veiled, yet direct, threat against Israel.
Israel should not listen to anyone telling them when to attack, as in an 'October Surprise'. You know what you have to do. Do it, and may the LORD God of Abraham, Isaac, and Israel be with you.
Sunday, August 19, 2012
Is The United States Helping Iran To Get Nuclear Weapons?
Is The United States Helping Iran To Get Nuclear Weapons?
By: Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News US Correspondent
(Information for this article taken from www.israelnationalnews.com. Article is titled "Dempsey, Panetta Play Down Israeli Strike in Iran", published on 15 Aug 2012 by Elad Benari)
On Tuesday, 14 August, 2012, two senior U.S. officials tried to downplay the likelihood, and success, of an Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear processing facilities. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the U.S. Joint chiefs of Staff, spoke to reporters at the Pentagon on the matter.
"I might not be aware of all their capabilities, but I think it is a fair assessment that Israel can delay but not destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities," Dempsey said during the joint press briefing with Panetta. This appears to indicate that General Dempsey has a thorough knowledge of the situation and is leaning in favor of Iran in case Israel decides to strike. It also indicates that General Dempsey has a sizable knowledge of both Iranian defenses and Israeli attack strength, and doesn't think that Israel can stop Iran from acquiring a nuclear device for use against Israel and then America.
Israel has recently stated that if they (Israel, and other nations) don't act soon it may be too late to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Defense Secretary Panetta, however, has a different view:
"The reality is that we still believe there is room for diplomacy. The new sanctions are beginning to have an impact, the international community is unified in its resistance to Iranian nuclear development," he said. "The Prime Minister of Israel (Benjamin Netanyahu) has said the same thing: "Any military action should be the last and not the first solution.""
The problem with Mr. Panetta's statements are these: 1) He well knows Israel has tried diplomatic solutions with Iran and other Arab neighbors and they always fail. 2) Every time a peace treaty is 'desired' by Israel's neighbors and various members of the international community, Israel must always give up something before talks can even begin, usually with land being given up back to pre-1967 borders. 3) Mr. Panetta is either naive or he is lying. Anyone who has followed the situation knows that if Israel does not act now, Iran will have nuclear weapons and won't hesitate to use them.
The comments from Mr. Panetta and Gen. Dempsey come as speculation about an Israeli strike aimed at stopping Iran from getting their hands on nuclear weapons has increased over the past few days. Some people have speculated that such an attack may come by September or October.
Mr. Panetta's remarks closely resemble those spoken by White House Spokesman Jay Carney on Monday, August 13.
"We continue to believe that there is time and space for diplomacy," Mr. Carney said. "The opportunity remains for Iran to take advantage of this process by taking the necessary steps to come into compliance with its international obligations."
Given President Obama's treatment of Israel, wanting them to give up land back to pre-1967 borders, his condemnation of Israel's decisions to build apartments in East Jerusalem, which the Israelis own, and his support of anti-Israeli leaders and organizations like the Palestinians, Egypt's new President Mohammed Morsi, the Muslim Brotherhood, and President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad of Iran, it is clear that Mr. Carney is lying.
The only time Iran wants to come to the negotiating table regarding its nuclear weapons is to buy more time or be able to operate under the radar for a while longer without having to seem like the bad guys they are. And with the world community never failing to give Iran what it wants, it appears that the whole of the planet, with a few exceptions, wants Iran to have the time to develop nuclear weapons so they can hit Israel with one.
During the press briefing at the Pentagon, Mr. Panetta made remarks concerning recent events in Egypt along with President Morsi's decision to replace the country's military leadership: "I spoke with Egypt's new defense minister, General al-Sisi. He said he was committed to the principles of the peace agreement signed at Camp David and ensuring security in the Sinai Peninsula," said Panetta, adding that al-Sisi "is a highly qualified officer who spent much time training in the U.S. General al-Sisi expressed his great commitment to the relations between Egypt and the United States."
What training? Why? Has America been secretly serving as a training ground for Israel's enemies?
What Israel needs to do now is humble themselves before the LORD GOD of Abraham, Isaac, and Israel, seek his face, entreat him for deliverance, and then prepare for war.
By: Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News US Correspondent
(Information for this article taken from www.israelnationalnews.com. Article is titled "Dempsey, Panetta Play Down Israeli Strike in Iran", published on 15 Aug 2012 by Elad Benari)
On Tuesday, 14 August, 2012, two senior U.S. officials tried to downplay the likelihood, and success, of an Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear processing facilities. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the U.S. Joint chiefs of Staff, spoke to reporters at the Pentagon on the matter.
"I might not be aware of all their capabilities, but I think it is a fair assessment that Israel can delay but not destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities," Dempsey said during the joint press briefing with Panetta. This appears to indicate that General Dempsey has a thorough knowledge of the situation and is leaning in favor of Iran in case Israel decides to strike. It also indicates that General Dempsey has a sizable knowledge of both Iranian defenses and Israeli attack strength, and doesn't think that Israel can stop Iran from acquiring a nuclear device for use against Israel and then America.
Israel has recently stated that if they (Israel, and other nations) don't act soon it may be too late to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Defense Secretary Panetta, however, has a different view:
"The reality is that we still believe there is room for diplomacy. The new sanctions are beginning to have an impact, the international community is unified in its resistance to Iranian nuclear development," he said. "The Prime Minister of Israel (Benjamin Netanyahu) has said the same thing: "Any military action should be the last and not the first solution.""
The problem with Mr. Panetta's statements are these: 1) He well knows Israel has tried diplomatic solutions with Iran and other Arab neighbors and they always fail. 2) Every time a peace treaty is 'desired' by Israel's neighbors and various members of the international community, Israel must always give up something before talks can even begin, usually with land being given up back to pre-1967 borders. 3) Mr. Panetta is either naive or he is lying. Anyone who has followed the situation knows that if Israel does not act now, Iran will have nuclear weapons and won't hesitate to use them.
The comments from Mr. Panetta and Gen. Dempsey come as speculation about an Israeli strike aimed at stopping Iran from getting their hands on nuclear weapons has increased over the past few days. Some people have speculated that such an attack may come by September or October.
Mr. Panetta's remarks closely resemble those spoken by White House Spokesman Jay Carney on Monday, August 13.
"We continue to believe that there is time and space for diplomacy," Mr. Carney said. "The opportunity remains for Iran to take advantage of this process by taking the necessary steps to come into compliance with its international obligations."
Given President Obama's treatment of Israel, wanting them to give up land back to pre-1967 borders, his condemnation of Israel's decisions to build apartments in East Jerusalem, which the Israelis own, and his support of anti-Israeli leaders and organizations like the Palestinians, Egypt's new President Mohammed Morsi, the Muslim Brotherhood, and President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad of Iran, it is clear that Mr. Carney is lying.
The only time Iran wants to come to the negotiating table regarding its nuclear weapons is to buy more time or be able to operate under the radar for a while longer without having to seem like the bad guys they are. And with the world community never failing to give Iran what it wants, it appears that the whole of the planet, with a few exceptions, wants Iran to have the time to develop nuclear weapons so they can hit Israel with one.
During the press briefing at the Pentagon, Mr. Panetta made remarks concerning recent events in Egypt along with President Morsi's decision to replace the country's military leadership: "I spoke with Egypt's new defense minister, General al-Sisi. He said he was committed to the principles of the peace agreement signed at Camp David and ensuring security in the Sinai Peninsula," said Panetta, adding that al-Sisi "is a highly qualified officer who spent much time training in the U.S. General al-Sisi expressed his great commitment to the relations between Egypt and the United States."
What training? Why? Has America been secretly serving as a training ground for Israel's enemies?
What Israel needs to do now is humble themselves before the LORD GOD of Abraham, Isaac, and Israel, seek his face, entreat him for deliverance, and then prepare for war.
Saturday, August 18, 2012
Iran: Israel's existence 'insult to all humanity' - Yahoo! News
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thursday, August 16, 2012
Your Friend Has Shared An Article on Business Insider
 View this email online | Add newsletter@businessinsider.com to your address book | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | |
| | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
?>){kind=spacer}
If you believe this has been sent to you in error, please safely unsubscribe.