Showing posts with label Betrayal of America. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Betrayal of America. Show all posts
Saturday, July 6, 2013
Monday, July 1, 2013
US Invasion Of America Predicted: Training For This Since Before 1990
In the mid 2000's I was in a McDonald's in Summerville, South Carolina with my wife and newborn son. While standing in line waiting to place my order, I met a man who said he was a former Marine. We got to talking and I asked him if he had ever heard of Military Operations on Urban Terrain (Urbanized in some cases)? He immediately had a deflated look to him and confessed to me that the United States Marine Corps had been training for MOUT since at least 1990, when he came back from a tour of Operation Desert Storm.
I did not get the man's name, but I have no doubts as to his credentials or story as I have checked out various topics related to it that have come up and they have affirmed what I have suspected.
The conclusion is inescapable: The United States military has been training to attack American citizens in cases of civil and economic unrest for more than 20 years. And it is about to come to fruition unless a miracle happens.
Below are links to stories to verify what I am saying:
http://conspiracyprophecyguy.blogspot.com/2013/06/the-betrayal-of-united-states-of.html
http://conspiracyprophecyguy.blogspot.com/2013/06/john-kerry-us-will-sign-un-arms-treaty.html
http://www.specialoperations.com/mout/issues.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOUT
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/mout.htm
http://conspiracyprophecyguy.blogspot.com/2013/07/marshall-ramsey-ii-has-shared-news-from_1.html
I did not get the man's name, but I have no doubts as to his credentials or story as I have checked out various topics related to it that have come up and they have affirmed what I have suspected.
The conclusion is inescapable: The United States military has been training to attack American citizens in cases of civil and economic unrest for more than 20 years. And it is about to come to fruition unless a miracle happens.
Below are links to stories to verify what I am saying:
http://conspiracyprophecyguy.blogspot.com/2013/06/the-betrayal-of-united-states-of.html
http://conspiracyprophecyguy.blogspot.com/2013/06/john-kerry-us-will-sign-un-arms-treaty.html
http://www.specialoperations.com/mout/issues.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOUT
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/mout.htm
http://conspiracyprophecyguy.blogspot.com/2013/07/marshall-ramsey-ii-has-shared-news-from_1.html
Friday, June 21, 2013
John Kerry: US will sign UN Arms Treaty
(From June 3, 2013; original post found at http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06/03/lawmakers-urge-obama-to-reject-un-arms-treaty-as-it-opens-for-signature/)
Secretary of State John Kerry said Monday that the Obama administration would sign a controversial U.N. treaty on arms regulation, despite bipartisan resistance in Congress from members concerned it could lead to new gun control measures in the U.S.
The treaty would require countries that ratify it to establish national regulations to control the transfer of conventional arms and components and to regulate arms brokers, but it will not explicitly control the domestic use of weapons in any country.
Kerry, releasing a written statement as the U.N. treaty opened for signature Monday, said the U.S. "welcomes" the next phase for the treaty, which the U.N. General Assembly approved on April 2.
"We look forward to signing it as soon as the process of conforming the official translations is completed satisfactorily," he said. Kerry called the treaty "an important contribution to efforts to stem the illicit trade in conventional weapons, which fuels conflict, empowers violent extremists, and contributes to violations of human rights."
Last week, 130 members of Congress signed a letter to Obama and Kerry urging them to reject the measure for this and other reasons.
"As your review of the treaty continues, we strongly encourage your administration to recognize its textual, inherent and procedural flaws, to uphold our country's constitutional protections of civilian firearms ownership, and to defend the sovereignty of the United States, and thus to decide not to sign this treaty," the lawmakers wrote.
Still, gun-rights supporters on Capitol Hill warn the treaty could be used as the basis for additional gun regulations inside the U.S. and have threatened not to ratify.
The United Nations has organized a high-level signing ceremony at U.N. headquarters on Monday -- a sign of the treaty's global importance -- and several dozen countries are expected to sign, the first step to ratification.
The chance of adoption by the U.S. is slim, even if Obama goes ahead and signs it -- as early as Monday, or possibly months down the road. A majority of Senate members have come out against the treaty. A two-thirds majority would be needed in the Senate to ratify.
What impact the treaty will have in curbing the estimated $60 billion global arms trade remains to be seen. The U.N. treaty will take effect after 50 countries ratify it, and a lot will depend on which ones ratify and which ones don't, and how stringently it is implemented.
The treaty covers battle tanks, armored combat vehicles, large-caliber artillery systems, combat aircraft, attack helicopters, warships, missiles and missile launchers, and small arms and light weapons.
It prohibits states that ratify it from transferring conventional weapons if they violate arms embargoes or if they promote acts of genocide, crimes against humanity or war crimes. The treaty also prohibits the export of conventional arms if they could be used in attacks on civilians or civilian buildings such as schools and hospitals.
In addition, the treaty requires countries to take measures to prevent the diversion of conventional weapons to the illicit market. This is among the provisions that gun-rights supporters in Congress are concerned about.
Secretary of State John Kerry said Monday that the Obama administration would sign a controversial U.N. treaty on arms regulation, despite bipartisan resistance in Congress from members concerned it could lead to new gun control measures in the U.S.
The treaty would require countries that ratify it to establish national regulations to control the transfer of conventional arms and components and to regulate arms brokers, but it will not explicitly control the domestic use of weapons in any country.
Kerry, releasing a written statement as the U.N. treaty opened for signature Monday, said the U.S. "welcomes" the next phase for the treaty, which the U.N. General Assembly approved on April 2.
"We look forward to signing it as soon as the process of conforming the official translations is completed satisfactorily," he said. Kerry called the treaty "an important contribution to efforts to stem the illicit trade in conventional weapons, which fuels conflict, empowers violent extremists, and contributes to violations of human rights."
Last week, 130 members of Congress signed a letter to Obama and Kerry urging them to reject the measure for this and other reasons.
"As your review of the treaty continues, we strongly encourage your administration to recognize its textual, inherent and procedural flaws, to uphold our country's constitutional protections of civilian firearms ownership, and to defend the sovereignty of the United States, and thus to decide not to sign this treaty," the lawmakers wrote.
Still, gun-rights supporters on Capitol Hill warn the treaty could be used as the basis for additional gun regulations inside the U.S. and have threatened not to ratify.
The United Nations has organized a high-level signing ceremony at U.N. headquarters on Monday -- a sign of the treaty's global importance -- and several dozen countries are expected to sign, the first step to ratification.
The chance of adoption by the U.S. is slim, even if Obama goes ahead and signs it -- as early as Monday, or possibly months down the road. A majority of Senate members have come out against the treaty. A two-thirds majority would be needed in the Senate to ratify.
What impact the treaty will have in curbing the estimated $60 billion global arms trade remains to be seen. The U.N. treaty will take effect after 50 countries ratify it, and a lot will depend on which ones ratify and which ones don't, and how stringently it is implemented.
The treaty covers battle tanks, armored combat vehicles, large-caliber artillery systems, combat aircraft, attack helicopters, warships, missiles and missile launchers, and small arms and light weapons.
It prohibits states that ratify it from transferring conventional weapons if they violate arms embargoes or if they promote acts of genocide, crimes against humanity or war crimes. The treaty also prohibits the export of conventional arms if they could be used in attacks on civilians or civilian buildings such as schools and hospitals.
In addition, the treaty requires countries to take measures to prevent the diversion of conventional weapons to the illicit market. This is among the provisions that gun-rights supporters in Congress are concerned about.
The Betrayal Of The United States Of America: Stories From 1999 to 2013
I think this article needs to be reposted due to the imminence of the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
Both China and the U.S. have conscientiously embarked on a series of measured steps to build military relations. These steps have included a series of mutual naval port visits, exchange visits by top military leaders, and working level talks and meetings.
As 1998 ended, several events took place which furthered China-U.S. military relations. Between 9-14 November, the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) hosted a visit by the then U.S. Commander in Chief, Pacific (USCINCPAC), Adm. Joseph W. Prueher. Adm. Prueher was accompanied by Lt. Gen. Carl Fulford, the Commander of U.S. Marine Forces Pacific; Maj. Gen. Earl Hailston, the Director for Strategic Planning and Policy for U.S. Pacific Command; and Ambassador Charles Twining, the Foreign Policy Advisor to USCINCPAC. Adm. Prueher met with many of the PLA's senior leaders including Gen. Zhang Wannian, Vice Chairman of the Central Military Commission; Gen. Fu Quanyou, Chief of the General Staff; Gen. Wang Ke, Chief of the Logistics Department; and Lt. Gen. Xiong Guangkai, Deputy Chief of the General Staff. Adm. Prueher's visit focused on discussions with senior Chinese military leaders about Asia-Pacific security issues and bilateral defense relations for the coming year. He was also interested in learning more about China's economic reforms and PLA modernization.
The PLA hosted visits by Adm. Prueher to the 47th Army Group headquarters in Xian, and to a subordinate air defense brigade. This was the first time a foreign military officer had visited these two commands. He was also hosted by the PLA Air Force for a visit to the 28th Air Attack Division in Hangzhou. There he observed ordnance loading of PLA Air Force A-5s and a live-fire demonstration of an air-to-ground attack by four A-5s. In Shanghai, the PLA Navy hosted his visit to the Shanghai Naval Command and a tour of the Jiangwei-class frigate Huainan.
Soon after this visit, China hosted a visit by Rear Adm. Harry Highfill, Commander, Amphibious Forces Seventh Fleet and by the USS Vandegrift (FFG-48). The Vandegrift is a guided-missile frigate home-ported in Yokosuka, Japan, and is the flagship for the amphibious force commander. The visit took place in Shanghai, 4-8 December.
USS Vandegrift, captained by Cmdr. Neal Kusomoto, was met by the PLA Navy's Jiangwei-class frigate Anqing at the mouth of the Yangtze River, which escorted the Vandegrift to her berth in Shanghai. Rear Adm. Hou Yuexi, Commander of the Shanghai Naval Base, welcomed the Americans. Rear Adm. Highfill also met Vice Mayor Feng Guoqin. The U.S. naval visitors were invited to tour the Anqing. In return, Adm. Highfill hosted a dinner aboard the USS Vandegrift. Later the USS Vandegrift held an open house for a visit by over 3,500 Chinese officials and citizens. (You don't let members of a foreign nation's military on board your own naval vessels unless you have hardcore assurance that you own them. Kings have taken foreign kings on tours of their palaces in times past, and have lost those same kingdoms very swiftly.)
Between 9-11 December, another form of interchange took place between the Chinese and U.S. military. The 2nd Sino-American Navy working level consultative talks took place in San Diego, California. The purpose of these continuing semiannual talks is to explore procedures for safely working together on the high seas, as well as to build mutual confidence and understanding. (What mutual understanding is needed unless the two militaries, and their political leaders, plan on working together toward a common goal?)
This meeting was part of an agreed upon series of meetings established by the Military Maritime Consultative Agreement. This agreement calls for two working meetings each year: one with delegations headed by an officer with the rank of navy captain (colonel equivalent); and a plenary session headed by flag (general/admiral equivalent) officers. The first working group and plenary meetings were held in Beijing during 1998.
The U.S. Naval Amphibious Base at Coronado, California (near San Diego) hosted the stay for the Chinese delegation and was the site for the meetings. The meetings included briefings and presentations, as well as an open and frank exchange of information and ideas. Subjects ranged from navigation and communications to safe operations of ships and aircraft on the high seas.
The PLA Navy officers were invited to a tour and lunch aboard the guided-missile destroyer USS Stetham (DDG-63). They also toured the U.S. Navy's Maritime Ship Handling Simulator at San Diego Naval Station, as well as famous San Diego tourist attractions. These talks set the framework for the follow-on working group meeting planned for Qingdao, China in April 1999. They also helped prepare the ground for the 2nd annual plenary meeting planned for Honolulu, Hawaii, in July 1999.
The process of mutual consultation, openness, and sharing of concerns and information needed to preclude future misunderstandings and to build mutual...relations is taking place between the U.S. and China's armed forces, especially in the military maritime domain. The armed forces of the two nations carry a special responsibility (secret deal that demilitarizes the United States) to build upon these exchanges to continually enhance military relations (make sure China gets stronger) for the benefit of the peoples of China, (to assure China that we won't attack them), the U.S. and the entire Asia-Pacific region.(1)
(1) From 1999: http://www.fas.org/nuke/control/sea/news/china-us.htm
(2) From 2012: http://eng.chinamil.com.cn/news-channels/china-military-news/2012-01/18/content_4771719.htm
(3) From 2013: http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90786/8287257.html; http://beforeitsnews.com/economics-and-politics/2013/06/has-us-given-china-eminent-domain-over-us-property-as-collateral-for-usas-reckless-spending-spree-2454074.html?utm_medium=verticalresponse&utm_source=direct-b4in.info&utm_content=beforeit39snews-verticalresponse&utm_term=http%3A%2F%2Fb4in.info%2Fp8ox&utm_campaign=
For some extra informative reading on directly- and indirectly related matter, please visit the following links:
(4) http://www.fas.org/nuke/control/sea/text/us-china98.htm
(5) http://www.fas.org/nuke/control/sea/text/sea1.htm
Both China and the U.S. have conscientiously embarked on a series of measured steps to build military relations. These steps have included a series of mutual naval port visits, exchange visits by top military leaders, and working level talks and meetings.
As 1998 ended, several events took place which furthered China-U.S. military relations. Between 9-14 November, the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) hosted a visit by the then U.S. Commander in Chief, Pacific (USCINCPAC), Adm. Joseph W. Prueher. Adm. Prueher was accompanied by Lt. Gen. Carl Fulford, the Commander of U.S. Marine Forces Pacific; Maj. Gen. Earl Hailston, the Director for Strategic Planning and Policy for U.S. Pacific Command; and Ambassador Charles Twining, the Foreign Policy Advisor to USCINCPAC. Adm. Prueher met with many of the PLA's senior leaders including Gen. Zhang Wannian, Vice Chairman of the Central Military Commission; Gen. Fu Quanyou, Chief of the General Staff; Gen. Wang Ke, Chief of the Logistics Department; and Lt. Gen. Xiong Guangkai, Deputy Chief of the General Staff. Adm. Prueher's visit focused on discussions with senior Chinese military leaders about Asia-Pacific security issues and bilateral defense relations for the coming year. He was also interested in learning more about China's economic reforms and PLA modernization.
The PLA hosted visits by Adm. Prueher to the 47th Army Group headquarters in Xian, and to a subordinate air defense brigade. This was the first time a foreign military officer had visited these two commands. He was also hosted by the PLA Air Force for a visit to the 28th Air Attack Division in Hangzhou. There he observed ordnance loading of PLA Air Force A-5s and a live-fire demonstration of an air-to-ground attack by four A-5s. In Shanghai, the PLA Navy hosted his visit to the Shanghai Naval Command and a tour of the Jiangwei-class frigate Huainan.
Soon after this visit, China hosted a visit by Rear Adm. Harry Highfill, Commander, Amphibious Forces Seventh Fleet and by the USS Vandegrift (FFG-48). The Vandegrift is a guided-missile frigate home-ported in Yokosuka, Japan, and is the flagship for the amphibious force commander. The visit took place in Shanghai, 4-8 December.
USS Vandegrift, captained by Cmdr. Neal Kusomoto, was met by the PLA Navy's Jiangwei-class frigate Anqing at the mouth of the Yangtze River, which escorted the Vandegrift to her berth in Shanghai. Rear Adm. Hou Yuexi, Commander of the Shanghai Naval Base, welcomed the Americans. Rear Adm. Highfill also met Vice Mayor Feng Guoqin. The U.S. naval visitors were invited to tour the Anqing. In return, Adm. Highfill hosted a dinner aboard the USS Vandegrift. Later the USS Vandegrift held an open house for a visit by over 3,500 Chinese officials and citizens. (You don't let members of a foreign nation's military on board your own naval vessels unless you have hardcore assurance that you own them. Kings have taken foreign kings on tours of their palaces in times past, and have lost those same kingdoms very swiftly.)
Between 9-11 December, another form of interchange took place between the Chinese and U.S. military. The 2nd Sino-American Navy working level consultative talks took place in San Diego, California. The purpose of these continuing semiannual talks is to explore procedures for safely working together on the high seas, as well as to build mutual confidence and understanding. (What mutual understanding is needed unless the two militaries, and their political leaders, plan on working together toward a common goal?)
This meeting was part of an agreed upon series of meetings established by the Military Maritime Consultative Agreement. This agreement calls for two working meetings each year: one with delegations headed by an officer with the rank of navy captain (colonel equivalent); and a plenary session headed by flag (general/admiral equivalent) officers. The first working group and plenary meetings were held in Beijing during 1998.
The U.S. Naval Amphibious Base at Coronado, California (near San Diego) hosted the stay for the Chinese delegation and was the site for the meetings. The meetings included briefings and presentations, as well as an open and frank exchange of information and ideas. Subjects ranged from navigation and communications to safe operations of ships and aircraft on the high seas.
The PLA Navy officers were invited to a tour and lunch aboard the guided-missile destroyer USS Stetham (DDG-63). They also toured the U.S. Navy's Maritime Ship Handling Simulator at San Diego Naval Station, as well as famous San Diego tourist attractions. These talks set the framework for the follow-on working group meeting planned for Qingdao, China in April 1999. They also helped prepare the ground for the 2nd annual plenary meeting planned for Honolulu, Hawaii, in July 1999.
The process of mutual consultation, openness, and sharing of concerns and information needed to preclude future misunderstandings and to build mutual...relations is taking place between the U.S. and China's armed forces, especially in the military maritime domain. The armed forces of the two nations carry a special responsibility (secret deal that demilitarizes the United States) to build upon these exchanges to continually enhance military relations (make sure China gets stronger) for the benefit of the peoples of China, (to assure China that we won't attack them), the U.S. and the entire Asia-Pacific region.(1)
(1) From 1999: http://www.fas.org/nuke/control/sea/news/china-us.htm
(2) From 2012: http://eng.chinamil.com.cn/news-channels/china-military-news/2012-01/18/content_4771719.htm
(3) From 2013: http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90786/8287257.html; http://beforeitsnews.com/economics-and-politics/2013/06/has-us-given-china-eminent-domain-over-us-property-as-collateral-for-usas-reckless-spending-spree-2454074.html?utm_medium=verticalresponse&utm_source=direct-b4in.info&utm_content=beforeit39snews-verticalresponse&utm_term=http%3A%2F%2Fb4in.info%2Fp8ox&utm_campaign=
For some extra informative reading on directly- and indirectly related matter, please visit the following links:
(4) http://www.fas.org/nuke/control/sea/text/us-china98.htm
(5) http://www.fas.org/nuke/control/sea/text/sea1.htm
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)