Apparently, TPTB want us to have a "meat tax" in order to save the planet from global warming, a.k.a. climate change. A meat tax could save our planet (msn.com)
Showing posts with label climate change. Show all posts
Showing posts with label climate change. Show all posts
Saturday, April 6, 2024
Wednesday, August 16, 2023
Manufactured Climate Consensus Deemed False By Climate Scientist – ‘The Time For Debate Has Ended’
Manufactured Climate Consensus Deemed False By Climate Scientist – ‘The Time For Debate Has Ended’
Lilli Keeve, OPlaneta
There has been an «overwhelming scientific consensus» that global warming is being caused by humans, a statement supported by fact-check articles.
However, many climate scientists have challenged this slogan in the past few years.
One of these scientists is renowned 2022 Nobel Prize winner and physicist Dr. John Clauser. Recently, he stated that there is no man-made global warming crisis. John Coleman, a fellow scientist and Weather Channel founder, agreed with his belief that «there is no significant man-made global warming.»
Georgia Institute of Technology’s Judith Curry, an American climatologist, affirms that the man-made climate crisis is «manufactured.» Her research on hurricanes, remote sensing, atmospheric modeling, climate models, and more has spanned decades and has been published in over one hundred scientific papers.
According to Curry, there’s been an «overwhelming consensus» over this untrue slogan which scientists have pursued «fame and fortune» over. The scientists who research global warming created by humans are more likely to be acknowledged and quoted by popular culture. They are also more likely to be akin to celebrities and given large grants from the federal government.
As a result, «climate hysteria» was born and adopted by the public, but Curry isn’t buying it. She shared: “I was adopted by the environmental advocacy groups and the alarmists and I was treated like a rock star. Flown all over the place to meet with politicians. Like a good scientist, I investigated.”
She said that «ugly things» have been performed by alarmist scientists to further their narrative about global warming, which is all politically driven. Take, for example, the notorious «Climategate scandal.» It revealed that certain scientists weren’t sharing data and privately admitting in exposed emails that the planet isn’t in a climate crisis.
«Avoiding Freedom of Information Act requests» was one of these «ugly things.» She also says that there is a «climate change industry» that champions alarmism.
U.N. officials, according to Curry, were motivated by «anti-capitalism. They hated the oil companies and seized on the climate change issue to move their policies along.» She continued: “The IPCC (the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was created by the U.N.) wasn’t supposed to focus on any benefits of warming. The IPCC’s mandate was to look for dangerous human-caused climate change.”
Curry’s thoughts don’t stop there. “Then the national funding agencies directed all the funding … assuming there are dangerous impacts,” she said. “The editor of the journal Science wrote this political rant. The time for debate has ended.”
“What kind of message does that give?” Curry further adds. “Promote the alarming papers! Don’t even send the other ones out for review. If you wanted to advance in your career, like be at a prestigious university and get a big salary, have big laboratory space, get lots of grant funding, be director of an institute, there was clearly one path to go.”
Monday, April 28, 2014
A Partial Expose' of President Obama's 2013 Executive Order Titled -- " Preparing the United States for the Impact of Climate Change
By: Abdullah al-Shami, American citizen marked for death by President Obama under the advisement of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
stakeholder - person who has a vested, that is, financial interest in an agenda
Managing "Climate Change dangers" requires action by the federal government to prepare the general public to accept these actions. The federal government must work in close cooperation with these stakeholders. Planning on the part of the federal government must be coordinated with these stakeholders so as not to conflict with them. In many cases, the stakeholders seem to be the ones in control of the federal government and not the President.
Preparation and planning are mentioned here as two different thingss. Preparation might be passed off as necessary to achieve the goals of managing climate change problems, however, preparation to do something outside of planning indicates that something other than combating climate change difficulties is the real goal.
In President Obama's own words, the climate change agenda is about money and control, especially by a group of people who think they are above any government and any law. The climate change agenda is not about saving the environment, or even protecting the people of the earth from natural disasters. The federal government, in close coordination with these "stakeholders" must make plans to make it easier for federal, state, local, tribal, private-sector, and non-profit-sector entities to accept their authority as absolute, leaving nothing to question.
The real goal of climate change efforts is to safeguard the wealth, organizational structure (challenges to the powers of "The Powers That Be" will not be tolerated), current social conditions (real meaning of environment), natural resources (anything and everything that can make The Powers That Be money. Interestingly, while the 13th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America outlawed slavery, the ability to own, buy, and sell slaves was reintroduced into America through the 16th Amendment, which grants Congress the right to make money however they see fit. Of necessity, this includes slavery, sex trafficking, drugs, and other things, including kidnapping and extortion.) In President Obama's own words, climate change is not about protecting the environment, but about preserving the power of them that are already in power and their activities.
President Obama's part in this betrayal of the American public to those in the financial sector began on October 5, 2009 with the passage of Executive Order 13514, also known as the Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance in coordination with the Interagency Climate Change Adaptation Task Force, which was led by the Council on Environmental Quality, the Office of Science and Technology Policy, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Steps taken by the federal government supposedly to combat climate change (which, according to best estimates is about a two to three degree average temperature increase by the year 2030; supposedly this will cause the melting of all the ice on the polar ice caps, resulting in a one to two foot rise in sea level, which is supposed to bring about the end of all civilization) engaged and strong partnerships, and information sharing. If information is not being shared in a partnership, then what is a partnership? 2) Risk-informed decision-making and the tools to facilitate it - This implies that Washington's decisions made now in regard to climate change are not based at all on information regarding the risks of climate change, but something else. It also implies that massive amounts of money be spent to make sure this "climate change" agenda is brought to pass. It would be better stated that the climate that President Obama and the powers-that-be want to change is that they cannot come out in naked aggression and hostility to their enemies, acting with impunity against them regardless of what atrocity is inflicted upon them. 3) adaptive learning, in which experiences serve as opportunities to inform and adjust future actions - Learning from present situations to better prepare for the future is what they were supposed to be doing in the first place. Not only were they not doing this, but the United States government, not only under President Obama but under other presidents as well, seem to be operating with a disregard for the American public, which it views as an enemy. 4) preparedness planning - since it has already been determined that the United States federal, and in many cases, state and local governments, are acting contrary to the will of the American people, and that the American people are regarded as "the enemy," it can only be said that preparedness planning means that the federal government and their stakeholders have plans in place on how to handle an eventual uprising, should the truth about what they are up to ever get out, and mass numbers of America's citizenry start believing it, and doing something about it.
In an effort to bring about their agenda, all regions (Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) disaster regions), state governments, local communities, and Native American tribes are urged to identify and take action to remove or change any barriers, i.e. people that disagree with the government; any barriers that discourage invstments (spending money) or other actions to increase the nation's governmental reach and authority, under the face of clmate change) to take over and control every aspect of American life. The government of the United States of America, according to President Obama and his handlers, must be able to withstand against any form of opposition in regards to their attempt to destroy the United States of America and/or its national sovereignty, which is the real meaning behind the statement "the Nation's resilience to climate change." Of course, the public health is to be taken into account. For if the government, either through the legitimate military or President Obama's civilian military, a.k.a. local law enforcement agencies, should shed too much blood, their plans would backfire and the American people would put up resistance to them, even to the prosecution of our government officials.
They must also change policies and federal funding programs that may increase the federal government's inability to keep the truth from getting out (natural or built channels of information leakage), cost the government some money they don't want to have to pay, surrender control of water, land, and other natural resources, and control the flow of information so that local community efforts to promote the neo-Nazi police state effort and brain-washing efforts which are designed to get people to willingly give up their rights in exchange for a free meal, cell phone, or other item. Basically, they must shore up any real or perceived vulnerability they have so that their agenda, and only their agenda, is the one accomplished.
They must not hesitate to bribe federal, state, local, or tribal officials in furtherance of their goals (identify opportunities to support and encourage smarter, more climate-resilient investments by States, local communities, and tribes, including providing incentives (bribes) through agency guidance (which may include intimidation), grants (money), technical assistance, performance measures, safety considerations (military equipment), and other programs through various previously issued Executive Orders).
Federal, state, local, and tribal agencies are to report their progress in the furtherance of "the Plan," including accomplished and planned milestones. The federal government is to consider input from state, local, and tribal leaders on how best to promote "the Plan" (complete takeover of every aspect of American life, including whether or not you live or die) through various task forces and Executive Orders.
Source article: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/11/01/executive-order-preparing-united-states-impacts-climate-change
stakeholder - person who has a vested, that is, financial interest in an agenda
Managing "Climate Change dangers" requires action by the federal government to prepare the general public to accept these actions. The federal government must work in close cooperation with these stakeholders. Planning on the part of the federal government must be coordinated with these stakeholders so as not to conflict with them. In many cases, the stakeholders seem to be the ones in control of the federal government and not the President.
Preparation and planning are mentioned here as two different thingss. Preparation might be passed off as necessary to achieve the goals of managing climate change problems, however, preparation to do something outside of planning indicates that something other than combating climate change difficulties is the real goal.
In President Obama's own words, the climate change agenda is about money and control, especially by a group of people who think they are above any government and any law. The climate change agenda is not about saving the environment, or even protecting the people of the earth from natural disasters. The federal government, in close coordination with these "stakeholders" must make plans to make it easier for federal, state, local, tribal, private-sector, and non-profit-sector entities to accept their authority as absolute, leaving nothing to question.
The real goal of climate change efforts is to safeguard the wealth, organizational structure (challenges to the powers of "The Powers That Be" will not be tolerated), current social conditions (real meaning of environment), natural resources (anything and everything that can make The Powers That Be money. Interestingly, while the 13th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America outlawed slavery, the ability to own, buy, and sell slaves was reintroduced into America through the 16th Amendment, which grants Congress the right to make money however they see fit. Of necessity, this includes slavery, sex trafficking, drugs, and other things, including kidnapping and extortion.) In President Obama's own words, climate change is not about protecting the environment, but about preserving the power of them that are already in power and their activities.
President Obama's part in this betrayal of the American public to those in the financial sector began on October 5, 2009 with the passage of Executive Order 13514, also known as the Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance in coordination with the Interagency Climate Change Adaptation Task Force, which was led by the Council on Environmental Quality, the Office of Science and Technology Policy, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Steps taken by the federal government supposedly to combat climate change (which, according to best estimates is about a two to three degree average temperature increase by the year 2030; supposedly this will cause the melting of all the ice on the polar ice caps, resulting in a one to two foot rise in sea level, which is supposed to bring about the end of all civilization) engaged and strong partnerships, and information sharing. If information is not being shared in a partnership, then what is a partnership? 2) Risk-informed decision-making and the tools to facilitate it - This implies that Washington's decisions made now in regard to climate change are not based at all on information regarding the risks of climate change, but something else. It also implies that massive amounts of money be spent to make sure this "climate change" agenda is brought to pass. It would be better stated that the climate that President Obama and the powers-that-be want to change is that they cannot come out in naked aggression and hostility to their enemies, acting with impunity against them regardless of what atrocity is inflicted upon them. 3) adaptive learning, in which experiences serve as opportunities to inform and adjust future actions - Learning from present situations to better prepare for the future is what they were supposed to be doing in the first place. Not only were they not doing this, but the United States government, not only under President Obama but under other presidents as well, seem to be operating with a disregard for the American public, which it views as an enemy. 4) preparedness planning - since it has already been determined that the United States federal, and in many cases, state and local governments, are acting contrary to the will of the American people, and that the American people are regarded as "the enemy," it can only be said that preparedness planning means that the federal government and their stakeholders have plans in place on how to handle an eventual uprising, should the truth about what they are up to ever get out, and mass numbers of America's citizenry start believing it, and doing something about it.
In an effort to bring about their agenda, all regions (Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) disaster regions), state governments, local communities, and Native American tribes are urged to identify and take action to remove or change any barriers, i.e. people that disagree with the government; any barriers that discourage invstments (spending money) or other actions to increase the nation's governmental reach and authority, under the face of clmate change) to take over and control every aspect of American life. The government of the United States of America, according to President Obama and his handlers, must be able to withstand against any form of opposition in regards to their attempt to destroy the United States of America and/or its national sovereignty, which is the real meaning behind the statement "the Nation's resilience to climate change." Of course, the public health is to be taken into account. For if the government, either through the legitimate military or President Obama's civilian military, a.k.a. local law enforcement agencies, should shed too much blood, their plans would backfire and the American people would put up resistance to them, even to the prosecution of our government officials.
They must also change policies and federal funding programs that may increase the federal government's inability to keep the truth from getting out (natural or built channels of information leakage), cost the government some money they don't want to have to pay, surrender control of water, land, and other natural resources, and control the flow of information so that local community efforts to promote the neo-Nazi police state effort and brain-washing efforts which are designed to get people to willingly give up their rights in exchange for a free meal, cell phone, or other item. Basically, they must shore up any real or perceived vulnerability they have so that their agenda, and only their agenda, is the one accomplished.
They must not hesitate to bribe federal, state, local, or tribal officials in furtherance of their goals (identify opportunities to support and encourage smarter, more climate-resilient investments by States, local communities, and tribes, including providing incentives (bribes) through agency guidance (which may include intimidation), grants (money), technical assistance, performance measures, safety considerations (military equipment), and other programs through various previously issued Executive Orders).
Federal, state, local, and tribal agencies are to report their progress in the furtherance of "the Plan," including accomplished and planned milestones. The federal government is to consider input from state, local, and tribal leaders on how best to promote "the Plan" (complete takeover of every aspect of American life, including whether or not you live or die) through various task forces and Executive Orders.
Source article: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/11/01/executive-order-preparing-united-states-impacts-climate-change
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Climate Change and the New World Order
Check out this video from Youtube if you want the blunt force truth about the whole global warming/climate change situation: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMe5dOgbu40&feature=player_embedded
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)