Abdullah al-Shami's Nom De Guerre Decoded, Part 1

 WASHINGTON, D.C. -- For a few months now, the American public have wondered, "Who is Abdullah al-Shami?  Why does the United States government want to kill him without bringing him to trial?  Why don't they give us his real name?"  These are all very good questions, and today it is time to reveal Abdullah al-Shami's real name, age, place of birth, etc.  Following is a real-info interpretation on the article posted on the New York Times website which will give out the answers to these questions and more.

WASHINGTON -- He is known as Abdullah al-Shami, an Arabic name meaning Abdullah the Syrian.  But his nom de guerre masks a reality:  He was born in the United States, and the United States is now deciding whether to kill him.

       Abdullah al-Shami's real name is Marshall Ramsey II.  The reason Abdullah al-Shami was chosen as the nom de guerre is to reflect both an ancestral heritage (Mr. Ramsey has ancient Syrian anestry) and to disguise President Obama's real enemy.  The word Abdullah in Arabic means "servant of God."  The God of Marshall Ramsey II is Jesus Christ - he is a Christian.  Mr. Ramsey was, in fact, born in the United States of America and is well aware that the US government is trying to kill him.

       The above statement in the New York Times validates this assertion:  "and the United States is now deciding whether to kill him."  Note that the decision is not whether or not to kill him, that decision has already been made.  It seems that the only question being made by the Obama administration is WHEN to kill him, a far cry from IF they should.

 Mr. Shami, a militant who American officials say is living in the barren mountains of northwestern Pakistan, is at the center of a debate inside the government over whether President Obama should once again take the extraordinary step of authorizing the killing of an American citizen overseas.

       Mr. Ramsey, a peaceful man, lives in the state of South Carolina, not overseas as the NYT article relates.  Why does the Obama administration want to kill him?

It is a debate that encapsulates some of the thorniest questions raised by the targeted killing program that Mr. Obama has embraced as president: under what circumstances the government may kill American citizens without a trial, whether the battered leadership of Al Qaeda in Pakistan still poses an imminent threat to Americans, and whether the C.I.A. or the Pentagon ought to be the dominant agency running America's secret wars.

       It is a very thorny issue, indeed:  Killing United States citizens, ON US SOIL, WITHOUT TRIAL.  Not only that, but as Mr. Ramsey is a Christian, this reveals the al-Qaeda designation to be faithful members of Christianity.  It also reveals President Obama's real enemy:  Jesus Christ, and anyone who has faith in him.

       For some time, the leaders of the Christian community have been getting attacked in one way or another by the Untied States government, whether it's they be required to cater a homosexual marriage, face illegal tax audits, or submit to everything the government says in general.  Already evangelical Christians are designated as suspected terrorists.  The question being raised in this section by the NYT is who should do the killing:  The C.I.A. or the Pentagon?

Interviews with American officials and outside terrorism experts sketch only the most impressionistic portraits of Mr. Shami.

       This means that they want to keep details a closely guarded secret so the American public doesn't get wise to what they are planning.

Born in the United States, possibly in Texas, he moved with his family to the Middle East when he was a toddler. Obama administration officials declined requests to provide biographical information about Mr. Shami such as his real name and age -- saying that the information is classified -- or any specific information about where he was born or where he traveled after leaving the United States. But his nom de guerre has a familiar ring for jihadists: An operative of Al Qaeda named Abu Abdullah al-Shami escaped with three other people from the American military prison in Bagram, Afghanistan, in 2005 and was killed in a drone strike three years later.

       Mr. Ramsey was born in the United States as stated.  He was born in South Carolina to a former U.S. Marine named Marshall Dean Ramsey who died in 2013 in Alabama.  He followed after the tradition of his family and got saved when he was eight years old.  This is what is meant by the move to the Middle East.

       As stated above, the real name of Abdullah al-Shami is Marshall Ramsey II.  He was born on August 10, 1975, making him 39 years old as the date of this post.  He was born in South Carolina, in the now-abandoned Naval Health Clinic Charleston in Charleston, SC.

He came to the attention of the American authorities in 2008, around the same time that another American, Bryant Neal Vinas, was getting Qaeda training in Pakistan, one former counterterrorism official recalled. The authorities worried at the time that a surge of people with terrorism training and Western passports might be coming to the United States. Mr. Vinas was later captured and brought back to the United States, where he pleaded guilty to terrorism charges.

       Mr. Ramsey came to the attention of American authorities in 2008, around the same time as Bryant Neal Vinas was being trained in Pakistan by al-Qaeda, although the two have never met.  Western passports is taken to mean American citizenship.

The F.B.I. investigated Mr. Shami and determined that he had been born in the United States, but that he had left as a young child and had not maintained any ties to the country. In the years since then, Mr. Shami worked his way up the ranks of Al Qaeda’s senior leadership in Pakistan, his ascent aided by his marriage to the daughter of a top Qaeda leader. Last year, he appears to have risen to become one of Al Qaeda’s top planners for operations outside Pakistan, including plots against American troops in Afghanistan.

       The Federal Bureau of Investigation investigated Mr. Ramsey and determined that, obviously, was born in South Carolina, got saved when he was eight years old and has maintained his faith in Jesus Christ.  Mr. Ramsey has since worked his way up the ranks of Christianity's senior leadership in the kingdom of Heaven (which is what is meant by Pakistan, which means holy country).  His rise was aided by his marriage to the daughter of another Christian leader named Leslie "Terry" Collins.  In 2013, he rose (unbeknownst to him) to become one of Christianity's top planners for activities against corruption outside of the kingdom of Heaven, including plots against American troops and politicians.

“We have clear and convincing evidence that he’s involved in the production and distribution of I.E.D.’s,” said one senior administration official, referring to improvised explosive devices, long the leading killer of American troops in Afghanistan.

       The I.E.D.'s being talked about are news articles that link President Obama and others to terrorist activities themselves, in addition to other suspicious activities.  As you can tell from the links below, these IEDs cover everyone from soldiers in the military to united States Senators and Congressmen to President Obama himself.

Spokesmen for the Pentagon, the C.I.A. and the F.B.I. and a spokeswoman for the White House all declined to comment.

       I wonder why?

For someone with an elevated position in Al Qaeda, Mr. Shami has kept an unusually low profile. He has made no propaganda videos, nor does he seem to have been mentioned in any of the myriad online forums that militant groups use to motivate their followers, raise money and recruit new fighters.

       Mr. Ramsey has kept an unusually low profile for a couple of reasons, one of which is that he does not have a video camera to make a "propaganda" video.  Also, Mr. Ramsey is a recluse, which is another reason for the low profile.  This has enabled him to remain under the radar for many years while the United States government monitored and collected information on his fellow Christians.

       The above statement also is telling in that the United States government has been monitoring Christians for a number of years, quietly considering them "enemies of the state," although that specific charge is not directly mentioned.  Mr. Ramsey does not call in to contribute to various Christian Share-a-thons which is another reason the federal government has been unable to track him for so long.

The SITE Intelligence Group, which monitors the online communications and propaganda videos of militant groups, said it had no records of Mr. Shami’s name ever being discussed in chat rooms.

       The SITE Intelligence Group, found at https://www.siteintelgroup.com/, is the name of one government-connected agency that is monitoring Christian websites in general, and for Mr. al-Shami specifically.



http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/28/world/asia/us-militant-hidden-spurs-drone-debate.html
http://www.aljazeera.com/category/person/abdullah-al-shami
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdullah_(name)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_Health_Clinic_Charleston
http://nation.com.pk/letters/19-Jan-2013/the-true-meaning-of-pakistan
http://conspiracyprophecyguy.blogspot.com/2014/08/data-breach-reported-by-usis-fraud-real.html
http://conspiracyprophecyguy.blogspot.com/2014/06/is-united-states-of-america-now-irans.html
http://conspiracyprophecyguy.blogspot.com/2014/05/behind-closed-doors-what-really-happens.html
http://conspiracyprophecyguy.blogspot.com/2014/05/kelli-bordeaux-murder-its-not-nicholas.html
http://conspiracyprophecyguy.blogspot.com/2014/04/a-partial-expose-of-president-obamas.html
http://conspiracyprophecyguy.blogspot.com/2014/04/us-plane-spotted-at-iranian-airport.html

Is the United States of America Now Iran's B!tch?

By:  Marshall Ramsey II

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- In a speech last week, Iran's real president Ayatollah Ali Khamenei announced to the Muslim world that the U.S. has "given up" the option of using military force to achieve its goals and also boasted of a world-wide "Islamic Awakening" that could not be stopped.

Speaking on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the death of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic Republic who died in 1989, Khamenei issued his first public reaction since President Obama asserted at a speech at the West Point military academy in West Point, NY, that chances for stopping Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons are better through diplomatic channels than military ones.

"For the first time in a decade, we have a very real chance of achieving a breakthrough agreement," Obama said, "one that is more effective and durable than what would be achieved through the use of force."

Mr. Khamenei on June 4, however, had a different take on the matter.

"America cannot do a d--- thing," said a banner which appeared underneath Khamenei during the speech.

"They have renounced the idea of any military actions," he said.  "They have understood that in Afghanistan and Iraq, after a military invasion, they were harmed.  They realized that military attacks are as dangerous or even more dangerous for the assaulting country as they are for the country attacked." (The only reason our soldiers were harmed in Afghanistan is because of President Obama's rules-of-engagement, one of which declares that if a Taliban fighter fires a weapon at a U.S. soldier and then straightway drops his weapon, he is no longer considered an enemy combatant and therefore cannot be fired upon.)

What Mr. Khamenei may not realize is that President Obama hates this country about as much as he does, maybe more.  In a straight-up military conflict, the United States of America would wipe Iran off the map, without the use of nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons.  Both President Obama and Ayatollah Khamenei know this.  The only way for the United States of America to fall is from within:  First, by forsaking Jesus Christ, which we've done; second, we have to have a corrupt leadership who would sell us out for some campaign contributions and/or the promise of a greater role in the coming global government, which we have and they have.

In his speech at West Point, which was delivered at the end of last month, President Obama said "all options to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon" are still on the table, but talked repeatedly about America's "costly wars" which he refuses to end unless his popularity is slipping, and warned that not every problem has a military solution.

"Some of our costly mistakes came ... from our willingness to rush into military adventures," the President stated.  "U.S. military action cannot be the only or even primary component of our leadership."

For one thing, Mr. President, the United States of America does not have military action as its sole, or even primary, way of handling foreign affairs.  Second, unless it is against our allies, even our own citizens, military action doesn't even appear to be an option.  President Obama's comments have all the effect of telling our military and our citizenry that we should just bend over and let Iran butt-rape us at will until they kill us.

Al-Monitor reports that when protests began in the Middle East and in North Africa, they were called the "Arab Spring."  Many Iranian officials however, viewed them as a continuation of the 1979 Iranian revolution, thus giving them the name "Islamic Awakening." (Islamic Awakening is code for "global jihad.")

"Perhaps Western intelligence organizations give reports that they were able to suppress the Islamic Awakening in our region," Khamenei said, according to an Al-Monitor report.  "This will be another one of our enemy's strategic mistakes and incorrect analyses.  It's possible that in some parts of the world the Islamic Awakening will be suppressed, but undoubtedly, it will not be uprooted -- and it will spread."

Make no mistake, Iran's real leadership, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has declared war on the United States of America.  He will do everything in his power to destroy us, including with President Obama's help.

Source article:  http://www.wnd.com/2014/06/iranian-leader-celebrates-u-s-has-given-up/

A Partial Expose' of President Obama's 2013 Executive Order Titled -- " Preparing the United States for the Impact of Climate Change

By:  Abdullah al-Shami, American citizen marked for death by President Obama under the advisement of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)

stakeholder - person who has a vested, that is, financial interest in an agenda

Managing "Climate Change dangers" requires action by the federal government to prepare the general public to accept these actions.  The federal government must work in close cooperation with these stakeholders.  Planning on the part of the federal government must be coordinated with these stakeholders so as not to conflict with them.  In many cases, the stakeholders seem to be the ones in control of the federal government and not the President.

Preparation and planning are mentioned here as two different thingss.  Preparation might be passed off as necessary to achieve the goals of managing climate change problems, however, preparation to do something outside of planning indicates that something other than combating climate change difficulties is the real goal.

In President Obama's own words, the climate change agenda is about money and control, especially by a group of people who think they are above any government and any law.  The climate change agenda is not about saving the environment, or even protecting the people of the earth from natural disasters.  The federal government, in close coordination with these "stakeholders" must make plans to make it easier for federal, state, local, tribal, private-sector, and non-profit-sector entities to accept their authority as absolute, leaving nothing to question.

The real goal of climate change efforts is to safeguard the wealth, organizational structure (challenges to the powers of "The Powers That Be" will not be tolerated), current social conditions (real meaning of environment), natural resources (anything and everything that can make The Powers That Be money.  Interestingly, while the 13th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America outlawed slavery, the ability to own, buy, and sell slaves was reintroduced into America through the 16th Amendment, which grants Congress the right to make money however they see fit.  Of necessity, this includes slavery, sex trafficking, drugs, and other things, including kidnapping and extortion.)  In President Obama's own words, climate change is not about protecting the environment, but about preserving the power of them that are already in power and their activities.

President Obama's part in this betrayal of the American public to those in the financial sector began on October 5, 2009 with the passage of Executive Order 13514, also known as the Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance in coordination with the Interagency Climate Change Adaptation Task Force, which was led by the Council on Environmental Quality, the Office of Science and Technology Policy, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Steps taken by the federal government supposedly to combat climate change (which, according to best estimates is about a two to three degree average temperature increase by the year 2030; supposedly this will cause the melting of all the ice on the polar ice caps, resulting in a one to two foot rise in sea level, which is supposed to bring about the end of all civilization) engaged and strong partnerships, and information sharing.  If information is not being shared in a partnership, then what is a partnership?  2) Risk-informed decision-making and the tools to facilitate it - This implies that Washington's decisions made now in regard to climate change are not based at all on information regarding the risks of climate change, but something else.  It also implies that massive amounts of money be spent to make sure this "climate change" agenda is brought to pass.  It would be better stated that the climate that President Obama and the powers-that-be want to change is that they cannot come out in naked aggression and hostility to their enemies, acting with impunity against them regardless of what atrocity is inflicted upon them.  3) adaptive learning, in which experiences serve as opportunities to inform and adjust future actions - Learning from present situations to better prepare for the future is what they were supposed to be doing in the first place.  Not only were they not doing this, but the United States government, not only under President Obama but under other presidents as well, seem to be operating with a disregard for the American public, which it views as an enemy.  4) preparedness planning - since it has already been determined that the United States federal, and in many cases, state and local governments, are acting contrary to the will of the American people, and that the American people are regarded as "the enemy," it can only be said that preparedness planning means that the federal government and their stakeholders have plans in place on how to handle an eventual uprising, should the truth about what they are up to ever get out, and mass numbers of America's citizenry start believing it, and doing something about it.

In an effort to bring about their agenda, all regions (Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) disaster regions), state governments, local communities, and Native American tribes are urged to identify and take action to remove or change any barriers, i.e. people that disagree with the government; any barriers that discourage invstments (spending money) or other actions to increase the nation's governmental reach and authority, under the face of clmate change) to take over and control every aspect of American life.  The government of the United States of America, according to President Obama and his handlers, must be able to withstand against any form of opposition in regards to their attempt to destroy the United States of America and/or its national sovereignty, which is the real meaning behind the statement "the Nation's resilience to climate change."  Of course, the public health is to be taken into account.  For if the government, either through the legitimate military or President Obama's civilian military, a.k.a. local law enforcement agencies, should shed too much blood, their plans would backfire and the American people would put up resistance to them, even to the prosecution of our government officials.

They must also change policies and federal funding programs that may increase the federal government's inability to keep the truth from getting out (natural or built channels of information leakage), cost the government some money they don't want to have to pay, surrender control of water, land, and other natural resources, and control the flow of information so that local community efforts to promote the neo-Nazi police state effort and brain-washing efforts which are designed to get people to willingly give up their rights in exchange for a free meal, cell phone, or other item.  Basically, they must shore up any real or perceived vulnerability they have so that their agenda, and only their agenda, is the one accomplished.

They must not hesitate to bribe federal, state, local, or tribal officials in furtherance of their goals (identify opportunities to support and encourage smarter, more climate-resilient investments by States, local communities, and tribes, including providing incentives (bribes) through agency guidance (which may include intimidation), grants (money), technical assistance, performance measures, safety considerations (military equipment), and other programs through various previously issued Executive Orders).

Federal, state, local, and tribal agencies are to report their progress in the furtherance of "the Plan," including accomplished and planned milestones.  The federal government is to consider input from state, local, and tribal leaders on how best to promote "the Plan" (complete takeover of every aspect of American life, including whether or not you live or die) through various task forces and Executive Orders.



Source article:  http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/11/01/executive-order-preparing-united-states-impacts-climate-change

"In 2013, people really interested in radioactive fallout" -- US gov't studying public attention to Fukushima, tracks twitter searches -- NRC FOIA: "Libyan war news should now downgrade Fukushima"

"In 2013, people really interested in radioactive fallout" -- US gov't studying public attention to Fukushima, tracks twitter searches -- NRC FOIA: "Libyan war news should now downgrade Fukushima"

International Business Times, Dec. 11, 2013: In 2013, people were really interested in radioactive fallout from the Fukushima disaster [...] Altmetric factors in both news stories and social media chatter in determining just how popular a scientific paper is. The top-scoring paper, published in the journal Scientific Reports by a pair of Japanese researchers, examined the radioactive cesium contamination of freshwater fish in the areas surrounding the Fukushima nuclear plant.

U.S. Department of Energy, Feb. 2013: Section 4 utilizes data from new sources – social media (Twitter) postings and Google search patterns – to trace the changes in public attention to nuclear issues before, during and after the Fukushima event. […] We use these data to focus on the shifts in public attention that occurred with the onset of the crises at the Fukushima nuclear reactors […] 

For the complete article, please go to:  http://enenews.com/in-2013-people-were-really-interested-radioactive-fallout-us-studies-public-attention-to-fukushima-tracks-twitter-search-terms-nrc-foia-libyan-war-news-should-now-downgrade-fukushima-ne

Japan enacts state secrets law late Friday night amid revolt -- "It criminalizes investigative journalism" -- Terrorism defined as "imposing one’s opinions on others"

Japan enacts state secrets law late Friday night amid revolt -- "It criminalizes investigative journalism" -- Terrorism defined as "imposing one's opinions on others"


http://enenews.com/secrets-law-passes-late-friday-night-amid-revolt-mushrooming-opposition-it-criminalizes-investigative-journalism-terrorism-defined-as-imposing-ones-opinions-on-others-protesto