Tuesday, September 2, 2014

Fw: Reporter Grills WH Press Secretary: 'Why Is Obama Still Raising Campaign Money & Playing Golf?'






Conservative Videos Responsive Email

Aug 31, 2014
View in Browser
Logo



Featured Videos


Reporter Grills WH Press Secretary: 'Why Is Obama Still Raising Campaign Money & Playing Golf?'

Watch this video
h
 
Image Caption
'Will You Shut Up?!': Fox Guest Goes Ballistic on 'Moron' Michelle Fields Over Negotiating With Terrorists


Image Caption
Revised: Tony Stewart Speaks Publicly for First Time Since Accident That Killed Kevin Ward


 


 
 


What you might have missed...

Image Caption
Taking The Lord's Name In Vain: Michael Brown Isn't Jesus Christ


Image Caption
'Get a Gun in Your Home!' Ladies on 'The View' Take Surprising Stance


Image Caption
Cracker Barrel Fires 73-Year-Old Veteran Who Gave Food To 'Needy' Man


Image Caption
Jon Karl Battles it Out With Jay Carney Over New Benghazi Email Revelation


 
 


You might like
 
DON'T LET THE FISCAL CLIFF CAUSE YOUR BUSINESS' PROFITS TO ROLL DOWNHILL. CLICK HERE.
Facebook Twitter Google+
Copyright © 2014. Conservative Videos is a member of Liberty Alliance. All rights reserved.
147 Ponderosa Trail | Dallas, GA 30132






Fw: Monsanto (tries to) shoot the messenger.



ESSAY OF THE WEEK

Just. Plain. Wrong.

In her June 25 keynote address to the BIO International Convention in San Diego, Calif., Hillary Clinton voiced strong support for genetic engineering and genetically engineered crops. She earned a standing ovation that day by stating that the biotech industry suffers from a public perception problem and that it just needs "a better vocabulary" in order to persuade GMO skeptics who don't understand "the facts" about genetic engineering.
And then Hillary proceeded to get the facts wrong.
Why does it matter what Hillary, who holds no public office and has not (yet) declared her candidacy for president, says or believes about genetic engineering and genetically modified crops and foods?
It doesn't. Unless she throws her hat in the ring for the Democratic nomination. And then it matters not just what her position on GMOs is, not just how deep her financial ties with the biotech industry run, not just how much she distorts the facts about the "promise" of biotech crops.
It matters, deeply, to more than 90 percent of Americans, what her position is on GMO labeling laws.
If elected, will Hillary support consumers' right to know? Or will she support the DARK Act, a bill introduced in Congress earlier this year, that would preempt state GMO labeling laws?
Hillary has been coy about announcing her candidacy. On clarifying her position on GMO labeling laws, she's been dead silent.
As she soon heads to Iowa—the testing ground for presidential candidates—Hillary's presidential aspirations will no doubt become more clear. If she runs, as the pundits predict, it will be up to the GMO labeling movement to demand that she take a stand on GMO labeling laws.
Meanwhile, here's why Hillary's speech to the BIO convention was just plain wrong.
 
 

ACTION ALERT

Shooting the Messenger

Reuters Reporter Carey Gillam has written about genetic engineering and food for the past 16 years. But Monsanto doesn't always like what Gillam says, no matter how balanced or well researched.
So the Biotech Bullies recently tried to pressure Reuters into removing Gillam from her beat.
Thankfully, Reuters is standing up to the Biotech Bullies.
As Christina Sarich of InfoWars.com wrote:
What is happening now with journalism, and the scape-goating of Gillam, is no different than what biotech has done in other arenas. Their decades-long history of contaminating this planet and its people with dangerous chemicals is well known, in part due to efforts like those of Gillam, and other writers like myself who are willing to stay staunch when shills and puppets try to take the heat off Monsanto, Dow, Bayer, etc.
Gillam, no rookie reporter, has been singled out by her peers for her fair and objective reporting. Civil Eats, an award-winning daily news source focusing on food issues, cited Gillam in an article, "24 Women Food and Agriculture Reporters You Should Know About."

But the biotech bullies don't want good reporters writing about GMOs. They don't want anybody writing about GMOs—unless those writers are on Monsanto's payroll.
Let's tell Reuters we support the media outlet's decision to stand by Gillam, and to support balanced journalism and the right of free speech.
 
 

ACTION ALERT

Why Bother?

Last month, we launched a petition
calling out Hillary Clinton on her support for GMOs. So far, nearly 95,000 people have signed the petition.
We'd like to make that number a lot bigger.
Why? Why bother to try to change the mind of someone who has such a long history of financial ties to the biotech industry? Someone who isn't even an elected official or a candidate?
Because when Hillary talks, the media listens. And right now, they're hanging on her every word, as they wait for her to announce that she'll run for president in 2016.
All signs point to a run, including the fact that Hillary is headed to Iowa.
If (or when?) Hillary runs for president, we need to make GMO labeling laws a big campaign issue. And to do that, we need big numbers.
We already know from her speech to the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) convention in San Diego in June that Hillary supports genetic engineering. But she's so far managed to dodge the question of whether or not she supports state GMO labeling laws—or the DARK (Deny Americans the Right to Know) Act, introduced in Congress, that would preempt state GMO labeling laws.
If you haven't signed the petition, please sign today. If you've already signed, please ask five of your friends to sign, too.
 
 

SUPPORT OCA & OCF

Put Monsanto on Ice!

He did it! Ronnie Cummins, international director of the OCA and its Mexico affiliate, Via Organica, took the ice bucket challenge!
Can you like and share the video on facebook? For every "like" OCA will donate $2 to the Oregon initiative to label GMOs, which will be on the November ballot.
Here are a few fun facts about the Ice Bucket Challenge in general, and OCA's decision to participate.
First, we learned from the social media marketing experts at Social Fresh, that the Ice Bucket Challenge wasn't originally tied to the ALS Foundation specifically. Turns out, one person who took the challenge named ALS as their cause, and others just went along with it.
So, we thought, why not use the Ice Bucket Challenge to support GMO labeling?
Second, while we're all for curing ALS and other diseases, we're equally, if not more, concerned about preventing those illnesses (rather than supporting Big Pharma). As Sayer Ji, author, educator and founder of GreenMedInfo.com points out, there is a potential link between the use of agricultural pesticides (such as Monsanto's Roundup and Dow's 2,4-D) and ALS.

So we thought it only fitting to raise money to help prevent ALS by supporting GMO labeling laws.
And lastly,for those of you concerned about how much water was wasted, Ronnie took the challenge on the rooftop of a Via Organica classroom in Mexico, where a water catchment system made sure the water made its way back into the cistern it was taken from. (He challenges others to be equally responsible about recycling their Ice Bucket Challenge water).
So for those reasons, and all of the reasons we need to "Put the Ice on Monsanto," Ronnie took the challenge. And then he challenged Dave Murphy, co-founder of FoodDemocracyNOW! and David Bronner, or Dr. Bronner's Magic Soaps to Put the Ice on Monsanto next.
Please "like" and "share" Ronnie's Ice Bucket Challenge video today. OCA will donate $2 per "like," up to $200,000, to the YES on 92 campaign to label GMOs in Oregon.

Donate to the Organic Consumers Association (tax-deductible, helps support our work on behalf of organic standards, fair trade and public education)
Donate to the Organic Consumers Fund (non-tax-deductible, but necessary for our legislative efforts in Oregon, Colorado and other states)
 
 

COOK ORGANIC NOT THE PLANET

March with Vandana Shiva and OCA!

In a show of solidarity for the role organic agriculture can play in reversing climate change, Vandana Shiva will march with OCA's "Cook Organic, Not the Planet" contingent in the People's Climate March, on September 21, 2014, in New York City.
Can you get to New York to join us?
Organizers of the People's Climate March predict this could be the biggest action on climate the world's ever seen. That's exciting—but too often, the climate change message focuses exclusively on reducing fossil fuel emissions.
With Vandana's help, OCA will bring our message to the march—that organic, regenerative agriculture has the potential to actually reverse global warming. And unless we acknowledge—and act—on that strategy, we will not turn the sinking global warming ship around in time.
According to a recent study by the Rodale Institute, regenerative agriculture, if practiced globally, has the potential to sequester 100 percent of current, annual carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions.
Where do consumers fit into the picture? By supporting organics—for our own health and the health of our entire ecosystem.
The OCA's "Cook Organic Not the Planet" will join up with the Food Justice contingent for the Sunday, September 21 march in New York. Contact OCA's Alexis Baden-Mayer alexis@organicconsumers.org for details on how you can march with OCA and Vandana Shiva.
 
 

ACTION ALERT

Deadline September 8

It's not too late to add your voice.
On August 6 (2014), the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), over the objections of 50 members of Congress, and more than 500,000 citizens, scientists, farmers and health professionals, moved one step closer to approving Dow's new Enlist-brand soy and corn crops.
The crops are engineered to withstand massive doses of Enlist Duo herbicide, concocted from a combination of 2,4-D (used to make Agent Orange) and glyphosate, the key ingredient in Monsanto's Roundup.
The USDA has admitted http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/24d_deis.pdf that approval of Dow's new crops will cause the use of 2,4-D to skyrocket from 26 million pounds to 176 million pounds. Scientists predict worse.
Dow's 2,4-D is already the seventh largest source of dioxins in the U.S. It's been linked to a host of ills, including birth defects, infertility, allergies, Parkinson's disease, endocrine disruption and cancer.
It's unconscionable that the USDA would approve these crops. Yet the agency is less than 12 days away from doing just that. Unless we stop it.
 
 

ORGANICE RETAIL AND CONSUMER ALLIANCE

Consumer Power

"It behooves us to continue to look at other ways that we can effect change so that it is in the manufacturers' best financial interest to eliminate GMOs. In fact, it needs to be a great enough reward to counter-balance Monsanto's efforts to the contrary." - Art Ames, general manager, Berkshire Co-Op, Great Barrington, Mass.
Sometimes we forget how many tools we have in the toolbox.
Signing petitions, writing letters to the editor, passing legislation, getting out the vote, boycotting GMO-contaminated products, educating the general public, organizing marches and protests and just generally causing a ruckus. These are all important tools to build a movement, create change and rid the world of Monsanto's GMOs and toxic chemicals.
But let's not forget the power we have as consumers to influence the purchasing decisions of our local retail stores.
Where do you start? By asking.
What happens when the owner or manager of your favorite store says there aren't enough manufacturers or suppliers offering non-GMO alternatives? You ask your store to put more pressure on the manufacturers. Because as Art Ames says (above quote), change will come when it's in the best financial interest of the manufacturers to make the change.
How do you respond when your store owner or manager says it's a great idea, but just too hard?
You hand them this leaflet that directs them to an online toolkit that outlines successful strategies other retailers have used to create GMO labeling policies and work directly with manufacturers to supply more non-GMO products. You can do it!
 
 

LITTLE BYTES

Essential Reading for the Week

Please forward this publication to family and friends, place it on web sites,
print it, duplicate it and post it freely. Knowledge is power!

Organic Bytes is a publication of Organic Consumers Association

6771 South Silver Hill Drive - Finland, MN 55603 - Phone: 218-226-4164 - Fax: 218-353-7652


empowered by Salsa


Monday, September 1, 2014

Fw: The Open Scroll Blog - Decoding The Penitent Man; A man in the world, beneath the world






The Open Scroll Blog

The Open Scroll Blog


Posted: 30 Aug 2014 02:23 PM PDT
Darnell: Have you ever looked up at the stars and wondered?
Dr. Pyatt: Yeah, yeah. Always.
Darnell: I wondered too. I was fascinated by the universe. Space-time - are we alone - what happens next? I wondered so much I felt like nobody saw what I did.
Dr. Pyatt: "Like you're a man in the world, beneath the world."
Darnell: Yes! Exactly!

A man in the world, beneath the world. Just who is this Pyatt-Darnell character? Following the many clues reveals the familiar underworld-world theme and story of Isis raising Osiris into Horus. Lucifer himself even speaks through this film's clever characterizations, spilling the beans on motives and perspectives. The Penitent Man has much to reveal about what's soon to come. In another season, this would have warranted a lengthy series. Today, it gets a light touch. We're just about done, here.

In Part 1, some evidence was presented to illustrate the Occult nature of the film. I showed how some of the dialogue suggests the deception that will precede the revealing of the lawless one (2 Thes. 2:1-2). In this 2nd post I'm going to give some attention to the climax, which presents some of the facets of the revealing itself.

Darnell plays Osiris to Pyatt's Horus. Even though Darnell is the older Pyatt, returned from the future, Pyatt represents his second chance. In the closing scenes, Darnell dies in an incident where Pyatt receives a head wound. (Revelation 13:3) Pyatt goes into a coma as a result of the injury. When he awakens it is with an epiphany, knowing Darnell's great secret about wormhole manipulation, time viewing and travel. This takes place in a sequence where the goddess is given a substantial supporting role. I've been writing about the raising of Osiris into Horus and the manipulation of time that will be central to the event, and how Isis has a key role. In biblical language, the event is referred to as the revealing of the lawless one, which comes with a baptism and anointing.

I should make a few fundamental observations before decoding the film's climax.

There are many theories about time travel. Is it possible for Darnell to go back and converse with his younger self? No, and the reason why it's not goes beyond physics. It's a matter of spiritual authority. The sovereign God of time-space has complete oversight, and outside His own instances of exploitation, many of which are recorded in the Bible, that activity is strictly denied. The popular plot device where a man invents a time machine or special methodology and subsequently travels through time - it's fiction. Several years ago, the Lord took me and a friend for a visit to the timeless place, near to His throne. The immediate reason for the trip was to show her that Her God is the God of time, according to the narrative given to me. We understood. It's His domain. He's appointed a brief season for a limited exploitation of control, and there will be made an open show of it. Yet, it won't involve straight up "time travel" because it will involve lying signs and wonders. What will be achieved by the temporary temporal exploitation is just what the sovereign God intends, and nothing more or less than that. Time-space, and His adversary, are both, "servant constructs." Do you know it yet?

So, if we accept that the plot device in The Penitent Man is just that, the next point that should be made is how Darnell was not truly penitent. Think about the situation rationally. Instead of making an experiment of the probably unique opportunity presented to him, Darnell would have simply assassinated Pyatt. If the consequences were so dire, he would not have risked failure. He wasn't truly penitent. He lied because he's a representative of the father of lies.

What I'm going to share about the meaning of the film's climax requires a little more plot summary for background.

The incident where Darnell dies and Pyatt receives the head wound involves "his" friend Ovid. Ovid is Pyatt's best and only friend. He remains his friend after coming out of the coma, as a kind of Pyatt 2.0, or as we know him, Darnell. Ovid somehow traveled back in time just like Darnell. He had the good sense to know that his "good intentioned" friend had to be stopped in order to save the world from certain destruction. He brought a gun and was going to assassinate Pyatt, but Darnell intervened. In the scuffle, a stray bullet from Ovid's gun caused the head wound that put Pyatt into a coma. It was when he awakened from the coma that he received the secret knowledge that would bring the world to ruin. Both Darnell and future-Ovid die in the scuffle.

From the perspective of a film reviewer, the way the film ends suggests the answer to Darnell's questions about whether fate or destiny could be changed. It suggests, no, because despite having convinced Pyatt of the need to avoid going down the same road, the secret was recorded, and due to his negligence, his selfish and greedy wife was able to acquire it. We are left with the sense that she will use it to go down the same road of destruction. I note with interest that the Devil's own bid for and temporary grant of (limited) control will likewise fail to change his fate. The lawless one is doomed to destruction. All will be brought into judgment. There will eventually be a restoration of all things, but ultimate justice will manifest according to what is fit for the ages to come.

Again, the key to understanding the climax that is the Pyatt-into-Darnell transformation as the esoteric raising of Osiris into Horus, with the work of Isis. Perhaps the most succinct snapshot is evident when we perceive the role played by Ovid in the transformation.

Who is Ovid's namesake? Ovid was a famous Roman poet. (43 BC - 17 or 18 AD). He was best known for, Metamorphoses, which is considered to be one of the most important sources of classical mythology. Ovid - Metamorphosis. His bullet caused the Pyatt-to-Darnell transformation. Clever. Because Ovid the poet lived at the time when my Lord was a youth in his earthly body, when Rome occupied his land, there's a messianic association. Pyatt's friend Ovid lost an eye in an accident, which changed the course of his life. Because his left eye was "darkened," he is another Horus identity, as Harmerty: "Horus, who rules with two eyes." He causes the Pyatt-into-Darnell transformation, so it's a Horus Eye and Horus Metamorphosis. Ovid the poet, wrote plenty about Apollo, aka Horus.

I'll be giving the requisite goddess symbolism some attention too, but here's how the Osiris and Horus identities are supported.

When Mr. Darnell walks into Dr. Pyatt's office without an appointment, Darnell is not surprised that Dr. Pyatt isn't busy with other clients. He shows Pyatt his advertising brochure, pointing out a spelling error he had overlooked in the unprofessional effort to market his services. The part with the error reads, "dedicated to you happiness." That's a common mistake, and one that is easily overlooked, of course. In this esoteric work, it identifies an essential element in the raising of Osiris into Horus, the phallus. "Happiness" is being used as code for, penis, ha-penis. As the story goes, Osiris was killed and chopped into 14 pieces. Isis was able to retrieve 13, but the penis was lost, eaten by a fish. She substituted another phallus and magickally used it to bring forth Horus, from dead Osiris. Ha-penis plays a central role.

The writer's choice of the name, Darnell, suggests access to another dimension. Darnell, means, "hidden alcove, hidden niche." According to surnamedb.com, "This very interesting old name is one with a medicinal or herbal origin, deriving from the French "darnal", a plant which was thought to have the ability to produce an intoxicating substance." Such a substance might be considered entheogenic or as useful for shamanic or magical purposes.

Dr. Jason Pyatt's first name evokes the Argonaut from ancient Greece, who led the quest for the golden fleece. With Ovid making such an obvious connection to ancient mythology we can hardly ignore this allusion to Jason the Argonaut. Dr. Jason was certainly a man on a quest. The constellation, Argo, was his ship, so there is a celestial body and celestial quest in view.

The name, Pyatt, means, "little magpie or sign of the magpie, dweller near or at the sign of the magpie." This bird is of the crow family, and the crow is associated with Apollo. A magpie is one of the few animal species known to be able to recognize itself in a mirror test. Given that the film is a Mirror Images LTD production, and that it is the clever writer-producer's own entity, I have to think he's chosen the name with this in mind. A magpie is inherently linked with self recognition and identification, and so is Darnell, who sees himself, Pyatt, as in a mirror. Yellow-billed magpie flocks, which I used to see nearly every day when I lived in the Sacramento area, are known to engage in funeral-like behaviour for their dead. Osiris-Darnell, god of the dead, raised into Horus - Pyatt.

The Dr. got his diploma from the University of Northern Acadia. The name Acadia can be linked to the Akkadian Empire, where the Akkadian people of Mesopotamia worshipped Isis in the north as Inanna.

Dr. Pyatt's wife's name is Evelyn Pyatt - Eve. The first woman brought forth the first manchild, Cain, the first murderer. She was pregnant with Pyatt's baby, and the connection with Eve should be obvious as her sin brought the world to ruin, yet not without her husband. Whose seed it was is entirely consistent with the symbolism of this esoteric film. The actress who played Evelyn is named, Melissa Roberts. Melissa - the bee goddess! The bouquet of roses Dr. Pyatt had purchased were for her. That's the bouquet that we see aligned with the star. Venus. When Pyatt was wounded by Ovid's bullet, he and the bouquet fell to the floor, and the roses spilled out at her feet. Isis, at the scene of the Metamorphosis.

In the movie's promo poster, Darnell has just arrived in the present. He's sitting on a park bench. The back of the bench has three boards, and his body visually divides the bench in two. Code 33. One of the central aspects of Code 33 is a referencing of Jesus Christ, who died when he was 33 years old, and who was subsequently raised to eternal life. The scene in the park presents Darnell as the messianic pretender. It's set in the Fall of the year. In the Fall, right? He's not truly penitent, of course. The book of Enoch relates how the fallen angels petitioned for a penalty to be remitted, which is pertinent. With his second chance, the Adversary is going to try to succeed where he failed before, in seizing the throne of the Most High God in a time-control ploy.

To be continued, Lord willing.