Tuesday, June 16, 2015

Hackers Hitting US Government Computers a Fake; Crime Done By Members of U.S. Government

By:  Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent
 
Below is an account given by Ken Dilanian of the Associated Press regarding a hack attack on OPM computers and the theft of personal information.  The following is a verbatim copy of the article along with an explanation of what is really happening.
 
Union: Hackers have personnel data on every federal employee
 
By KEN DILANIAN
 
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Hackers stole personnel data and Social Security numbers for every federal employee, a government worker union said Thursday, saying that the cyber theft of U.S. employee information was more damaging that the Obama administration has acknowledged.
 
Sen. Harry Reid, the Democratic leader, said on the Senate floor that the December hack into Office of Personnel Management data was carried out by "the Chinese" without specifying whether he meant the Chinese government or individuals. Reid is one of eight lawmakers briefed on the most secret intelligence information. U.S. officials have declined to publicly blame China, which has denied involvement.
 
     (Democratic, not Democrat leader?  The term democracy does not mean, "the people rule."  It means "Rule the people," and implies a hardship in the manner of ruling.
 
     Why are we just learning about this hack now?  Why did the government want to keep it secret?  Since our leaders will not publicly blame China, yet make the claim that it was the Chinese suggests that our government knows that it is not China.  Since the United States is at war against its own citizens, it is likely an operation by the United States government designed to promote fear among the populace so that we will take absolute government control of everything more readily.)
 
J. David Cox, president of the American Federation of Government Employees, said in a letter to OPM director Katherine Archuleta that based on the incomplete information the union received from OPM, "We believe that the Central Personnel Data File was the targeted database, and that the hackers are now in possession of all personnel data for every federal employee, every federal retiree, and up to one million former federal employees."
 
     (Incomplete information received?  This suggests that Miss Archuleta is hiding something Mr. Cox, which suggests criminal activity, possibly even her own involvement in the data hack, as South Carolina governor Nikki Haley was involved in the data hack perpetrated by agents of the State of South Carolina and blamed on the Russians.)
 
The OPM data file contains the records of non-military, non-intelligence executive branch employees, which covers most federal civilian employees but not, for example, members of Congress and their staffs.
 
     (How convenient it only hit the civies, but not any members of Congress.)
 
The union believes the hackers stole military records and veterans' status information, address, birth date, job and pay history, health insurance, life insurance and pension information; and age, gender and race data, he said. The letter was obtained by The Associated Press.
 
     (One should now look to more delays in veterans receiving medical care, pensions and benefits, and receiving free data protection coverage from some online data collection, "protection", company.)
 
The union, which does not have direct access to the investigation, said it is basing its assessment on "sketchy" information provided by OPM. The agency has sought to downplay the damage, saying what was taken "could include" personnel file information such as Social Security numbers and birth dates.
 
     (OPM is lying.  The breaking into federal computers and stealing personal information is a go-to lie when it needs to spread some mass panic fairly quickly.  This may be related to the explosions heard in Flint, Michigan recently in supposed military "testing," which has already been tentatively linked to Jade Helm 15.  OPM is actually increasing the fear factor by stating Social Security numbers and birth dates were stolen, which is what they wanted to happen, as SSNs and birth dates are two of the most recognizable measures of identification in the US in government records.)
 
"We believe that Social Security numbers were not encrypted, a cybersecurity failure that is absolutely indefensible and outrageous," Cox said in the letter. The union called the breach "an abysmal failure on the part of the agency to guard data that has been entrusted to it by the federal workforce."
 
     (So OPM purposefully selected Americans' most sensitive information, Social Security numbers, to be placed in an unprotected file.  Mr. Cox is wrong, it is not an abysmal failure on the part of the government, but rather it was done on purpose, so that it would be easier to steal.)
 
Samuel Schumach, an OPM spokesman, said that "for security reasons, we will not discuss specifics of the information that might have been compromised."
 
     (I wonder why?)
 
The central personnel data file contains up to 780 separate pieces of information about an employee.
 
     (This is a fluff statement, put out specifically to cause people to panic.)
 
Cox complained in the letter that "very little substantive information has been shared with us, despite the fact that we represent more than 670,000 federal employees in departments and agencies throughout the executive branch."
 
     (This is exactly how OPM, who appears to be running the scam wants it.  As Miss Archuleta was personally chosen by President Obama to head up OPM, and that she answers to him, it is both conceivable and reasonable to think that President Obama knows about and is behind the data breach.  Who is he doing this for?  Himself?  I think not.  Rather, he appears to be doing this on behalf of the Illuminati, who have been directing American government behind the scenes for more than 100 years.  Names are available online of some of the TOP chiefs in the multi-headed hyrda organization.)
 
The union's release and Reid's comment in the Senate put into sharper focus what is looking like a massive cyber espionage success by China.  Sen. Susan Collins, an intelligence committee member, has also said the hack came from China.
 
     (China is a scapegoat, or at least not the party responsible for the hack.  What appears more likely is Miss Archuleta and some of her friends stole personal information on about four million people and sold it to China with the understanding that they were going to accuse someone in China of hacking into their computers so as to throw the American public off the trail and prevent them from finding out what really happened.  The online data protection company CSID has been chosen by OPM to offer data protection services to all those affected by the false hack attack.  This suggests that CSID is guilty of conspiring with the federal government to steal personal information from American citizens instituting a panicked state among the victims, to the end of them giving up more of their personal information which they would not do otherwise.)
 
Mike Rogers, the former chairman of the House intelligence committee, said last week that Chinese intelligence agencies have for some time been seeking to assemble a database of information about Americans. Those personal details can be used for blackmail, or also to shape bogus emails designed to appear legitimate while injecting spyware on the networks of government agencies or businesses Chinese hackers are trying to penetrate.
 
     (Rep. Rogers of Alabama seems to know a great deal of information regarding the intentions of these so-called Chinese hackers.  It appears as though he is in confederation with Miss Archuleta and President Obama, who appears to be running things behind the scene.  Rep. Rogers is also a known member of the criminal organization American Legislative Exchange Council, which has been known to arrange private meetings between Congressmen at the Federal and State levels and wealthy businesspersons so that they can bribe and be bribed without threat of being caught.)
 
U.S. intelligence officials say China, like the U.S., spies for national security advantage. Unlike the U.S., they say, China also engages in large-scale theft of corporate secrets for the benefit of state-sponsored enterprises that compete with Western companies. Nearly every major U.S. company has been hacked form China, they say.
 
     (This is because the U.S. is too busy cutting its own throat and selling the blood to China.)
 
The Office of Personnel Management is also a repository for extremely sensitive information assembled through background investigations of employees and contractors who hold security clearances. OPM's Schumach has said there is "no evidence" that information was taken. But there is a growing skepticism among intelligence agency employees and contractors about that claim.
 
In the Senate on Thursday, Democrats blocked a Republican effort to add a cybersecurity bill to a sweeping defense measure. The vote was 56-40, four votes short of the number necessary.
 
     (This is a bogus statement.  The bill actually did pass, legally.  Apparently, the Senate plays by the rules, "If there is not a filibuster proof majority, it is deemed not to have passed.  This indicates that the United States Senate is not in the interest of protecting the American public.  In a related manner, it also seems to suggest that they think they are not ordinary citizens but something special.)
 
Democrats had warned of the dangers of cyberspying after the theft of government personnel files, but Democrats voted against moving ahead on the legislation, frustrated with the GOP-led effort to tie the two bills together. President Barack Obama has threatened to veto the defense legislation over budget changes by the GOP.
 
     (This statement suggests that Democrats know the dangers of cyberspying and moved to help along the criminality of it.)
 
"The issue of cybersecurity is simply too important to be used as a political chit and tucked away in separate legislation." said Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del.
 
     (Senator Coons is lying.  He also is a member of the criminal organization known as ALEC.  His objection seems to suggest that he would lose a boatload of cash if the cybersecurity rider bill went through.  This is further confirmation that the United States Congress is only looking out for themselves.)
 
Supporting articles:  http://www.opm.gov/news/latest-news/announcements/, http://www.alec.org/initiatives/federal-relations/u-s-house-of-representatives/, http://www.alec.org/initiatives/federal-relations/senate/, http://conspiracyprophecyguy.blogspot.com/2014/05/behind-closed-doors-what-really-happens.html

No comments:

Post a Comment