Showing posts with label corrupt police. Show all posts
Showing posts with label corrupt police. Show all posts
Friday, October 13, 2017
Friday, September 11, 2015
Missing James Island Man Found Dead In Woods; Police Covering Up Details
Missing James Island Man Found Dead In Woods; Police Covering Up Details
By: Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent
The transcripts of the articles found at the accompanying links are taken word for word. The text in parentheses, including accusations of foul play by police officials, is mine.
from http://www.postandcourier.com/article/20150910/PC16/150919895
Body found in wooded area in St. George identified as missing James Island man, Dorchester County sheriff's deputies say
Christina Elmore
Sep 10 2015
A body found Thursday in a wooded area in St. George has been identified as a James Island man who was reported missing last week in Charleston County.
Bruce Howard, 55, died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the chest, Dorchester County Coroner Chris Nisbet said. He is believed to have died Sept. 4, Nisbet reported.
Authorities located the body shortly after 6 p.m. Thursday near Country Club Boulevard and Sugar Hill Road, according to Dorchester County sheriff's deputies.
Authorities had searched the area by air and with dogs after Howard's vehicle was found abandoned last week on Country Club Boulevard. Family members and co-workers last heard from Howard on Sept. 3, according to missing person's reports.
(As you will read later, they officially called off their search for Mr. Howard on September 9. If police actually searched the area with dogs, they would have found Mr. Howard's body earlier. The police are covering up information about the murder.)
Reach Christina Elmore at 937-5908
from http://www.live5news.com/story/30006465/coroner-body-of-missing-charleston-co-man-found-in-st-george
Coroner: Body of missing Charleston Co. man found in St. George
Posted: Sep 10, 2015 11:46 PM EST
Updated Sep 11, 2015 12:00 AM EST
ST. GEORGE, SC (WCSC) - The body of a missing Charleston County man was located Thursday night in St. George, according to the Dorchester County Coroner's Office.
The body of Bruce Howard, 55, was located in a wooded area near the intersection of Sugar Hill Road and Country Club Boulevard.
Howard was last seen by his co-workers at around 5 p.m. on Sep. 3, according to investigators. Howard's wife told investigators he never returned home.
Dorchester County Sheriff's deputies had located his vehicle parked near the entrance to Country Club Estates in Dorchester County.
Foul play was not suspected in Howard's death, according to Dorchester County Coroner Chris Nisbet.
from http://www.live5news.com/story/29996383/new-information-revealed-surrounding-disappearance-of-james-island-man
New Information revealed surrounding disappearance of James Island man
Posted: Sep 09, 2015 11:28 PM EST
Updated: Sep 09, 2015 11:28 PM EST
By Meaghan Wallace
CHARLESTON COUNTY, SC (WCSC) - A report released by the Charleston County Sheriff's Office is unveiling more information about what happened leading up to the disappearance of a James Island man.
In the report, a coworker tells authorities that he received a text from Howard's cell phone number, the day after Howard didn't return from work on Sept. 3.
Charleston County deputies say 55-year-old Bruce Howard was reported missing by his wife.
"We are looking for Bruce and I need your help in finding Bruce," said Michelle Howard, wife of missing man.
Howard's family and friends held a press conference Wednesday, pleading with the community to help bring Bruce home.
Michelle Howard says last Thursday started like any other, she and her husband left the house for work around 8 a.m.
Howard says she chatted with her husband on the phone, while they were both at work Thursday, around 11 a.m.
"It was very much a normal conversation," said Howard.
However, the night didn't end normal.
According to the report, a coworker is the last known person to have seen Howard Thursday night, sitting at his desk.
Howard was seen on surveillance video later that night, withdrawing $100 in cash out of a Wells Fargo ATM.
In the report, Howard's wife told authorities he rarely made purchases with cash.
The surveillance video from Wells Fargo is the last known sighting of Howard on Sept. 3. He never returned home that night.
(Why would Mr. Howard, who is believed to have worked for Wells Fargo in Charleston, South Carolina according to linkedin.com, take $100 out of an ATM, drive up to Saint George, park and lock his SUV, walk into the woods, and kill himself? The answer: he wouldn't. The likely scenario: Someone familiar with the Country Club Estates area of Saint George killed Bruce Howard, hid his body in the woods, then made a text to a co-worker to provide a cover trail. This suggests a planned hit, and that it was done by someone who knew Mr. Howard.)
"He has never not come home and we have always known where each other are, so it's alarming that he was not home on Thursday evening," said Howard.
According to the Sheriff's Office report, the same coworker who last saw Howard on Thursday, told authorities he received a text from Howard's cell phone Friday morning, Sept. 4. The report states it came in at 9:20 a.m. and read "just go up...overslept..getting going."
Howard's coworkers say he never showed up to work that day.
According to the police report, Howard's wireless carrier says his phone last pinged in the St. George area.
(If Mr. Howard had stayed in Saint George overnight, he most likely would have notified his wife, which he did not. Since we know that Mr. Howard was murdered, this means that someone took his cell phone in order to place a call to create a trail for themselves to make it look like he was still alive. Since Mr. Howard never showed up for work on Friday, September 4, one can safely say he was killed either late September 3 or very early September 4.)
Dorchester county Sheriff's Office was alerted and found Howard's Tahoe SUV on Friday.
The vehicle was parked, and locked, at the intersection of Sugar Hill Rd. and Country Club Blvd. in St. George.
(Why would Mr. Howard withdraw money from an ATM in the Charleston area, where he worked, drive to Saint George, park and lock his truck at the intersection of Country Club Boulevard and Sugar Hill Road, then walk into the woods and shot himself in the chest? He would not. Mr. Howard was murdered, possibly off-site, and then dumped in the woods where his body would later be found, would be most likely what happened. Also, if Mr. Howard committed suicide, why would he bother to lock the doors of his Tahoe? The leading of the accounts of events surrounding his death suggest that he knew he was going to commit suicide, so it is unlikely that Mr. Howard would take the time to lock his doors before walking supposedly walking into the woods and shooting himself in the chest.)
Dorchester county Sheriff's deputies also reported finding footprints leading from the vehicle down a path into the woods.
(In the video at the live5news.com website, it says that the police did not have any plans to search further for Mr. Howard in the area. As of September 10, 2015, his body was found with the help of search dogs. What caused them to change their minds? Since Mr. Howard's death appears to be a planned hit, it seems possible that Mr. Howard knew someone in the Charleston County police department, was killed by them, and dumped in the woods in Saint George.)
"I am at a complete loss," said Howard.
Howard's family is holding out hope that a tip from the community may lead authorities to finding Howard.
Charleston County Sheriff's deputies say multiple agencies helped search wooded area of St. George , where Howard's car was found but came up with nothing more than the footprints. As of now, authorities have no further plans to search that area this week.
(The only reason the didn't "find" Mr. Howard's body is because they already knew where it was and didn't want to "find" it until September 10, the day it was "found.")
Anyone with information should call consolidated dispatch at 743-7200.
Charleston County Sheriff's Office says there's no evidence of foul play, at this point. However, they're not ruling it out.
from http://www.abcnews4.com/story/30005917/dorchester-county-sheriffs-deputies-find-body-in-woods
Coroner: Body of missing James Island man found in Dorchester County woods
Posted: Sep 10, 2015 9:36 PM EST
Updated: Sep 10, 2015 11:31 PM EST
ST. GEORGE, S.C. (WCIV) -- A body found in the woods Thursday night has been identified as a James Island man missing since Sept. 4.
Dorchester County Coroner Chris Nisbet identified the body as Bruce Howard, 55, of James Island. Howard died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the chest, Nisbet said.
(According to a source familiar with suicide statistics, most people who commit suicide by gunshot are not going to shoot themselves in the chest. This means that Chris Nisbet may be covering up the truth of Bruce Howard's death. This means that Mr. Howard was most likely murdered by someone who knew Mr. Nisbet, most likely someone with the Charleston County Sheriff's Department, and Mr. Nisbet is actively helping to cover up his murder, which means that Mr. Nisbet was either contacted by someone in the Charleston County Sheriff's Office or has an ongoing criminal relationship with them.)
Deputies found the body near Sugar Hill Road and Country Club Boulevard Thursday night, Capt. Tony Phinney said.
Howard's SUV was found near Country Club Estates on Sept. 5.
(According to police officials per live5news.com, Mr. Howard's SUV was found on Friday, September 4. How is it that his vehicle is now found on September 5, a Saturday? The answer: Someone lied. Mr. Howard's vehicle was not found on September 5, but on September 4, the day before.)
By: Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent
The transcripts of the articles found at the accompanying links are taken word for word. The text in parentheses, including accusations of foul play by police officials, is mine.
from http://www.postandcourier.com/article/20150910/PC16/150919895
Body found in wooded area in St. George identified as missing James Island man, Dorchester County sheriff's deputies say
Christina Elmore
Sep 10 2015
A body found Thursday in a wooded area in St. George has been identified as a James Island man who was reported missing last week in Charleston County.
Bruce Howard, 55, died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the chest, Dorchester County Coroner Chris Nisbet said. He is believed to have died Sept. 4, Nisbet reported.
Authorities located the body shortly after 6 p.m. Thursday near Country Club Boulevard and Sugar Hill Road, according to Dorchester County sheriff's deputies.
Authorities had searched the area by air and with dogs after Howard's vehicle was found abandoned last week on Country Club Boulevard. Family members and co-workers last heard from Howard on Sept. 3, according to missing person's reports.
(As you will read later, they officially called off their search for Mr. Howard on September 9. If police actually searched the area with dogs, they would have found Mr. Howard's body earlier. The police are covering up information about the murder.)
Reach Christina Elmore at 937-5908
from http://www.live5news.com/story/30006465/coroner-body-of-missing-charleston-co-man-found-in-st-george
Coroner: Body of missing Charleston Co. man found in St. George
Posted: Sep 10, 2015 11:46 PM EST
Updated Sep 11, 2015 12:00 AM EST
ST. GEORGE, SC (WCSC) - The body of a missing Charleston County man was located Thursday night in St. George, according to the Dorchester County Coroner's Office.
The body of Bruce Howard, 55, was located in a wooded area near the intersection of Sugar Hill Road and Country Club Boulevard.
Howard was last seen by his co-workers at around 5 p.m. on Sep. 3, according to investigators. Howard's wife told investigators he never returned home.
Dorchester County Sheriff's deputies had located his vehicle parked near the entrance to Country Club Estates in Dorchester County.
Foul play was not suspected in Howard's death, according to Dorchester County Coroner Chris Nisbet.
from http://www.live5news.com/story/29996383/new-information-revealed-surrounding-disappearance-of-james-island-man
New Information revealed surrounding disappearance of James Island man
Posted: Sep 09, 2015 11:28 PM EST
Updated: Sep 09, 2015 11:28 PM EST
By Meaghan Wallace
CHARLESTON COUNTY, SC (WCSC) - A report released by the Charleston County Sheriff's Office is unveiling more information about what happened leading up to the disappearance of a James Island man.
In the report, a coworker tells authorities that he received a text from Howard's cell phone number, the day after Howard didn't return from work on Sept. 3.
Charleston County deputies say 55-year-old Bruce Howard was reported missing by his wife.
"We are looking for Bruce and I need your help in finding Bruce," said Michelle Howard, wife of missing man.
Howard's family and friends held a press conference Wednesday, pleading with the community to help bring Bruce home.
Michelle Howard says last Thursday started like any other, she and her husband left the house for work around 8 a.m.
Howard says she chatted with her husband on the phone, while they were both at work Thursday, around 11 a.m.
"It was very much a normal conversation," said Howard.
However, the night didn't end normal.
According to the report, a coworker is the last known person to have seen Howard Thursday night, sitting at his desk.
Howard was seen on surveillance video later that night, withdrawing $100 in cash out of a Wells Fargo ATM.
In the report, Howard's wife told authorities he rarely made purchases with cash.
The surveillance video from Wells Fargo is the last known sighting of Howard on Sept. 3. He never returned home that night.
(Why would Mr. Howard, who is believed to have worked for Wells Fargo in Charleston, South Carolina according to linkedin.com, take $100 out of an ATM, drive up to Saint George, park and lock his SUV, walk into the woods, and kill himself? The answer: he wouldn't. The likely scenario: Someone familiar with the Country Club Estates area of Saint George killed Bruce Howard, hid his body in the woods, then made a text to a co-worker to provide a cover trail. This suggests a planned hit, and that it was done by someone who knew Mr. Howard.)
"He has never not come home and we have always known where each other are, so it's alarming that he was not home on Thursday evening," said Howard.
According to the Sheriff's Office report, the same coworker who last saw Howard on Thursday, told authorities he received a text from Howard's cell phone Friday morning, Sept. 4. The report states it came in at 9:20 a.m. and read "just go up...overslept..getting going."
Howard's coworkers say he never showed up to work that day.
According to the police report, Howard's wireless carrier says his phone last pinged in the St. George area.
(If Mr. Howard had stayed in Saint George overnight, he most likely would have notified his wife, which he did not. Since we know that Mr. Howard was murdered, this means that someone took his cell phone in order to place a call to create a trail for themselves to make it look like he was still alive. Since Mr. Howard never showed up for work on Friday, September 4, one can safely say he was killed either late September 3 or very early September 4.)
Dorchester county Sheriff's Office was alerted and found Howard's Tahoe SUV on Friday.
The vehicle was parked, and locked, at the intersection of Sugar Hill Rd. and Country Club Blvd. in St. George.
(Why would Mr. Howard withdraw money from an ATM in the Charleston area, where he worked, drive to Saint George, park and lock his truck at the intersection of Country Club Boulevard and Sugar Hill Road, then walk into the woods and shot himself in the chest? He would not. Mr. Howard was murdered, possibly off-site, and then dumped in the woods where his body would later be found, would be most likely what happened. Also, if Mr. Howard committed suicide, why would he bother to lock the doors of his Tahoe? The leading of the accounts of events surrounding his death suggest that he knew he was going to commit suicide, so it is unlikely that Mr. Howard would take the time to lock his doors before walking supposedly walking into the woods and shooting himself in the chest.)
Dorchester county Sheriff's deputies also reported finding footprints leading from the vehicle down a path into the woods.
(In the video at the live5news.com website, it says that the police did not have any plans to search further for Mr. Howard in the area. As of September 10, 2015, his body was found with the help of search dogs. What caused them to change their minds? Since Mr. Howard's death appears to be a planned hit, it seems possible that Mr. Howard knew someone in the Charleston County police department, was killed by them, and dumped in the woods in Saint George.)
"I am at a complete loss," said Howard.
Howard's family is holding out hope that a tip from the community may lead authorities to finding Howard.
Charleston County Sheriff's deputies say multiple agencies helped search wooded area of St. George , where Howard's car was found but came up with nothing more than the footprints. As of now, authorities have no further plans to search that area this week.
(The only reason the didn't "find" Mr. Howard's body is because they already knew where it was and didn't want to "find" it until September 10, the day it was "found.")
Anyone with information should call consolidated dispatch at 743-7200.
Charleston County Sheriff's Office says there's no evidence of foul play, at this point. However, they're not ruling it out.
from http://www.abcnews4.com/story/30005917/dorchester-county-sheriffs-deputies-find-body-in-woods
Coroner: Body of missing James Island man found in Dorchester County woods
Posted: Sep 10, 2015 9:36 PM EST
Updated: Sep 10, 2015 11:31 PM EST
ST. GEORGE, S.C. (WCIV) -- A body found in the woods Thursday night has been identified as a James Island man missing since Sept. 4.
Dorchester County Coroner Chris Nisbet identified the body as Bruce Howard, 55, of James Island. Howard died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the chest, Nisbet said.
(According to a source familiar with suicide statistics, most people who commit suicide by gunshot are not going to shoot themselves in the chest. This means that Chris Nisbet may be covering up the truth of Bruce Howard's death. This means that Mr. Howard was most likely murdered by someone who knew Mr. Nisbet, most likely someone with the Charleston County Sheriff's Department, and Mr. Nisbet is actively helping to cover up his murder, which means that Mr. Nisbet was either contacted by someone in the Charleston County Sheriff's Office or has an ongoing criminal relationship with them.)
Deputies found the body near Sugar Hill Road and Country Club Boulevard Thursday night, Capt. Tony Phinney said.
Howard's SUV was found near Country Club Estates on Sept. 5.
(According to police officials per live5news.com, Mr. Howard's SUV was found on Friday, September 4. How is it that his vehicle is now found on September 5, a Saturday? The answer: Someone lied. Mr. Howard's vehicle was not found on September 5, but on September 4, the day before.)
Wednesday, September 2, 2015
Police Officer Death in Clyde, Texas Suspicious; Likely Performed By Fellow Officers
This story was copied verbatim from the link below.
from http://news.yahoo.com/slain-texas-officer-was-victim-of-planned-murder-by-several-parties--report-122600270.html
Homicide suspected in 'clearly suspicious' death of off-duty Texas officer: Police
By Michael Walsh
Yahoo News
The off-duty officer found dead in his Texas home Monday was likely the victim of a homicide, according to police.
Authorities say the manner of Abilene police Officer Don Allen's death is "clearly suspicious" and there is no indication that he was targeted at random.
(This means that his murder was purposeful, possibly linked to something he had done or knew.)
Family members found the 27-year-old's body at his home in the nearby city of Clyde.
Law enforcement blog LEO Affairs, citing local news site Big Country Homepage, says Allen may have been murdered in a coordinated attack. According to LEO Affairs, a search warrant of cell tower data contained these details:
This ruling isn't official, but a direct quote from the documents read, "Communication
occurred between multiple parties to plan and carry out the murder.[The officer filing
the warrant] believes cell towers within the 10-mile radius will have captured transac-
tion between the suspects who were involved in this murder."
(This means that the officer filing the warrant has an idea of who killed Officer Allen.)
When asked about the likelihood of Allen being targeted by several people in a premeditated attack, Clyde Police Chief Robert Dalton replied, "We have no direct information that would say that's the case. I'm not sure where that came from. Of course we're not releasing all the information because it's an active investigation. We try not to comment on the number of suspects."
(This is a lie. As is stated earlier in the section from the search warrant, a premeditated attack upon the life of Officer Allen was suspected by police, and [evidence says it] was planned in advance, giving rise to the possibility that Chief Dalton is connected to his murder somehow. Also interesting is that the search warrant filed by the police officer indicates that he (the officer filing the warrant) was not aware of any inside information, as Chief Dalton appears to. This now gives rise to the police that Officer Dalton was targeted for murder by his fellow police officers.)
The Clyde Police Department, which received a 911 call after 7 p.m. Monday, reached out to the Abilene Police Department and Texas Rangers for assistance. All three agencies are working with the FBI to investigate the incident. Allen's body was taken to the Tarrant County Medical Examiner's Office for an autopsy.
(Is the FBI involved in this? If so, then one must ask whether or not President Obama is involved; and if so, why?)
Dalton said a lot of misinformation is swirling around concerning Allen's death.
"One of those rumors is that there was some kind of anti-police message left at the scene. That is entirely untrue," he said in an interview with Yahoo News Wednesday. "We do not have any evidence at this time that Mr. Allen was targeted because he was a police officer."
(This appears to be a misdirection statement. By stating that police do not have "any evidence" that Officer Allen was targeted because he was a police officer, this would get people in the "conspiracy theory" thinking that it was. It would also cause them to ask the question, "Why are police trying to hide the information when it was clearly a targeted hit?" The reason for this is that while it draws suspicion to themselves, it casts the blame away from them, making it seem as though someone had a grudge against all police officers. The statement that there was no anti-police message at the scene actually is true. That is because certain members of the Clyde Police Department killed one of their own and wanted to make it look like someone else did it. The only possible reason for this seems to be that the police want to make people think that more heavily armed police, and in greater numbers, are needed for their safety. Unfortunately for the people of Clyde, Texas, the police appear to be the ones they need protection from.)
Dalton also wanted to reassure Clyde residents that law enforcement has no evidence that suggests they are in harm's way.
"It's a small town and there is some uneasiness right now, but we have no reaon to believe that other members of the public are in danger."
(As a police officer, Don Allen would not be recognized as a member of the public, but rather a public servant, a.k.a. a government employee (This distinction does not deny Officer Allen's rights as a citizen of Texas and the United States whatsoever.) What Chief Dalton is doing is threatening the citizens of Clyde with "potential" violence if they do not accept a greater police presence in Clyde. It could be that since Clyde PD is calling on Abilene PD and the Texas rangers, they are calling for greater assistance in covering up their crime. If these agencies are anything like certain law enforcement agencies in South Carolina, the likelihood of a police-on-police murder/cover-up increases dramatically.)
During a press conference Tuesday,Abilene Police Chief Stan Standridge addressed what many had been thinking: Allen's is the latest in a spate of violent police officer deaths.
"I do not want to police in a community where it's an us-versus-them mentality," Standridge said. "If we get there, we've lost. We have not lost."
(It appears that Chief Standridge believes that there are still some residents in Abilene that consider the police to be honest and not crooked. It also seems that he thinks it is an us-or-them situation. This would be especially true if the average police officer considers the public to be no different than enemies of the state, as per Presidential Memorandums 2039 and 2040.)
Before joining the Abilene Police Department, Allen was an officer in Cisco, Texas, for a year and five months. He served as a Texas peace officer for a total of three years and three months.
(What appears to have happened is that certain members of the Abilene Police Department wanted Officer Allen killed, got members of the Clyde PD to do it, and are involving themselves, Clyde PD, and the Texas Rangers in the cover-up. This appears to be a Police Brotherhood-related incident since in mentions in the article that Officer Allen was a peace officer for three years and three months, or 33. As stated in earlier articles, the number 11 or multiples thereof are indicators of an inside job as it relates to certain crimes such as homicide. Since we already know that members of at least two of the above-mentioned police agencies are trying to cover up Officer Allen's murder, the use of "three years and three months" further indicates that Officer Allen's murder was performed by police officers.)
Standridge described Allen as a "great man and great peace officer."
"Parents should not have to bury their children," he said, "and this family certainly needs our love and prayers during this time."
(Why bring in Officer Allen's parents? Could this be done because one or both of his parents offended Chief Standridge and he decided to make an example out of their son while proving his loyalty to the Brotherhood?)
A representative from the Texas Rangers was not immediately available for comment.
from http://news.yahoo.com/slain-texas-officer-was-victim-of-planned-murder-by-several-parties--report-122600270.html
Homicide suspected in 'clearly suspicious' death of off-duty Texas officer: Police
By Michael Walsh
Yahoo News
The off-duty officer found dead in his Texas home Monday was likely the victim of a homicide, according to police.
Authorities say the manner of Abilene police Officer Don Allen's death is "clearly suspicious" and there is no indication that he was targeted at random.
(This means that his murder was purposeful, possibly linked to something he had done or knew.)
Family members found the 27-year-old's body at his home in the nearby city of Clyde.
Law enforcement blog LEO Affairs, citing local news site Big Country Homepage, says Allen may have been murdered in a coordinated attack. According to LEO Affairs, a search warrant of cell tower data contained these details:
This ruling isn't official, but a direct quote from the documents read, "Communication
occurred between multiple parties to plan and carry out the murder.[The officer filing
the warrant] believes cell towers within the 10-mile radius will have captured transac-
tion between the suspects who were involved in this murder."
(This means that the officer filing the warrant has an idea of who killed Officer Allen.)
When asked about the likelihood of Allen being targeted by several people in a premeditated attack, Clyde Police Chief Robert Dalton replied, "We have no direct information that would say that's the case. I'm not sure where that came from. Of course we're not releasing all the information because it's an active investigation. We try not to comment on the number of suspects."
(This is a lie. As is stated earlier in the section from the search warrant, a premeditated attack upon the life of Officer Allen was suspected by police, and [evidence says it] was planned in advance, giving rise to the possibility that Chief Dalton is connected to his murder somehow. Also interesting is that the search warrant filed by the police officer indicates that he (the officer filing the warrant) was not aware of any inside information, as Chief Dalton appears to. This now gives rise to the police that Officer Dalton was targeted for murder by his fellow police officers.)
The Clyde Police Department, which received a 911 call after 7 p.m. Monday, reached out to the Abilene Police Department and Texas Rangers for assistance. All three agencies are working with the FBI to investigate the incident. Allen's body was taken to the Tarrant County Medical Examiner's Office for an autopsy.
(Is the FBI involved in this? If so, then one must ask whether or not President Obama is involved; and if so, why?)
Dalton said a lot of misinformation is swirling around concerning Allen's death.
"One of those rumors is that there was some kind of anti-police message left at the scene. That is entirely untrue," he said in an interview with Yahoo News Wednesday. "We do not have any evidence at this time that Mr. Allen was targeted because he was a police officer."
(This appears to be a misdirection statement. By stating that police do not have "any evidence" that Officer Allen was targeted because he was a police officer, this would get people in the "conspiracy theory" thinking that it was. It would also cause them to ask the question, "Why are police trying to hide the information when it was clearly a targeted hit?" The reason for this is that while it draws suspicion to themselves, it casts the blame away from them, making it seem as though someone had a grudge against all police officers. The statement that there was no anti-police message at the scene actually is true. That is because certain members of the Clyde Police Department killed one of their own and wanted to make it look like someone else did it. The only possible reason for this seems to be that the police want to make people think that more heavily armed police, and in greater numbers, are needed for their safety. Unfortunately for the people of Clyde, Texas, the police appear to be the ones they need protection from.)
Dalton also wanted to reassure Clyde residents that law enforcement has no evidence that suggests they are in harm's way.
"It's a small town and there is some uneasiness right now, but we have no reaon to believe that other members of the public are in danger."
(As a police officer, Don Allen would not be recognized as a member of the public, but rather a public servant, a.k.a. a government employee (This distinction does not deny Officer Allen's rights as a citizen of Texas and the United States whatsoever.) What Chief Dalton is doing is threatening the citizens of Clyde with "potential" violence if they do not accept a greater police presence in Clyde. It could be that since Clyde PD is calling on Abilene PD and the Texas rangers, they are calling for greater assistance in covering up their crime. If these agencies are anything like certain law enforcement agencies in South Carolina, the likelihood of a police-on-police murder/cover-up increases dramatically.)
During a press conference Tuesday,Abilene Police Chief Stan Standridge addressed what many had been thinking: Allen's is the latest in a spate of violent police officer deaths.
"I do not want to police in a community where it's an us-versus-them mentality," Standridge said. "If we get there, we've lost. We have not lost."
(It appears that Chief Standridge believes that there are still some residents in Abilene that consider the police to be honest and not crooked. It also seems that he thinks it is an us-or-them situation. This would be especially true if the average police officer considers the public to be no different than enemies of the state, as per Presidential Memorandums 2039 and 2040.)
Before joining the Abilene Police Department, Allen was an officer in Cisco, Texas, for a year and five months. He served as a Texas peace officer for a total of three years and three months.
(What appears to have happened is that certain members of the Abilene Police Department wanted Officer Allen killed, got members of the Clyde PD to do it, and are involving themselves, Clyde PD, and the Texas Rangers in the cover-up. This appears to be a Police Brotherhood-related incident since in mentions in the article that Officer Allen was a peace officer for three years and three months, or 33. As stated in earlier articles, the number 11 or multiples thereof are indicators of an inside job as it relates to certain crimes such as homicide. Since we already know that members of at least two of the above-mentioned police agencies are trying to cover up Officer Allen's murder, the use of "three years and three months" further indicates that Officer Allen's murder was performed by police officers.)
Standridge described Allen as a "great man and great peace officer."
"Parents should not have to bury their children," he said, "and this family certainly needs our love and prayers during this time."
(Why bring in Officer Allen's parents? Could this be done because one or both of his parents offended Chief Standridge and he decided to make an example out of their son while proving his loyalty to the Brotherhood?)
A representative from the Texas Rangers was not immediately available for comment.
Monday, June 8, 2015
Brotherhood Of Police Stage Fake Shooting; Victim's Story Questionable
By: Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent
HOLLYWOOD, South Carolina (WorthyNews) -- Last month, members of the Charleston County Sheriff's Office supposedly shot Brian Heyward inside his home after responding to a call at the same location.
Mr. Heyward, who lives at 5923 Scott-White Road in Hollywood, called 911 to report a break-in by two armed men just a couple of minutes after 11 AM Thursday, May 7. He said that they had already shot out his brother's window, who apparently lives in the same home.
According to the official story, deputies arrived at the scene to find two black men riding bicycles toward the mobile home's back yard. The officers chased the men, but were unable to catch them. After reaching the back of the home, they noticed a man standing near the doorway and holding a gun. The man, Brian Heyward, then confronted the officers at which point they told him to drop his weapon. After refusing the officers' demand to drop his gun, one of the officers fired a shot, presumably hitting Mr. Heyward in the neck.
Problems now arise with the official story. Why did Mr. Heyward, who called the police, challenge he deputies after they arrived, presumably pointing his gun at them? Unless the deputies first threatened Mr. Heyward outside of normal procedures, which appears unlikely, he would have immediately complied with the officers' demand to drop the gun if the situation was legitimate. This casts doubt on the credibility of everyone involved, including Mr. Heyward and the deputies responding to the call.
Another problem with the official story comes from Mr. Heyward himself. As reported earlier, two armed men had shot out Mr. Heyward's brother's window. Yet, according to the 911 call, Mr. Heyward states, "He's in my house," indicating there was only one intruder. What happened to the second gunman?
Either there was one gunman or two. If one, then Mr. Heyward and CCSO deputies lied in their statements. If two, then Mr. Heyward needs to read his script better when me makes his next fake 911 call.
More problems begin to surface. Presumably, the two men who shot out the window in the mobile home stuck around for almost nine minutes after the initial incident only to ride away on bicycles while being chased by police. While this may happen in extreme cases, the lack of items that the supposed robbers had on their persons suggest that there was no robbery, at least on the part of the two men riding away on bicycles.
The next problem is the grandmother. She stated that someone told her to call 911 because "someone was shooting at someone," and that she did see two people riding through on her driveway on bicycles. This means that the grandmother not only lives next door to Mr. Heyward and his brother, but also that she was at home at the time of the supposed incident. How is it then that she saw the two men that police officers saw riding through her driveway (which is connected to Mr. Heyward's) at the same time as the incident occurred, yet did not hear any shots fired nor see police chase after the two men on bikes that she saw. The police would have pulled up to the trailer just as the men were riding into the back yard. The answer: It did not happen as the police and Mr. Heyward said it did.
Now we move to the location Mr. Heyward was discovered. According to the official story (as related in the Post and Courier), Mr. Heyward was found at the back door of his house at the time of his shooting. Yet the 911 call clearly places him in the laundry room of his home at the same time, this being indicated by the loud noise heard on the 911 tape. Did Mr. Heyward walk into the laundry room after he was shot by police in the neck then manage to get into an altercation with them, then hang up the phone? I think not. Safer it is to say that Mr. Heyward and the police set up some kind of deal beforehand to fake a shooting incident, although to what end is only speculation at this point.
Although there is more that can be brought out here regarding the falsity of the official police story, an end is being made here. Sufficient is the evidence already presented that blows a hole the case for a shooting being presented by police. As far as Mr. Heyward being shot in the neck, it appears to be a fake, just like the rest of the official police story.
HOLLYWOOD, South Carolina (WorthyNews) -- Last month, members of the Charleston County Sheriff's Office supposedly shot Brian Heyward inside his home after responding to a call at the same location.
Mr. Heyward, who lives at 5923 Scott-White Road in Hollywood, called 911 to report a break-in by two armed men just a couple of minutes after 11 AM Thursday, May 7. He said that they had already shot out his brother's window, who apparently lives in the same home.
According to the official story, deputies arrived at the scene to find two black men riding bicycles toward the mobile home's back yard. The officers chased the men, but were unable to catch them. After reaching the back of the home, they noticed a man standing near the doorway and holding a gun. The man, Brian Heyward, then confronted the officers at which point they told him to drop his weapon. After refusing the officers' demand to drop his gun, one of the officers fired a shot, presumably hitting Mr. Heyward in the neck.
Problems now arise with the official story. Why did Mr. Heyward, who called the police, challenge he deputies after they arrived, presumably pointing his gun at them? Unless the deputies first threatened Mr. Heyward outside of normal procedures, which appears unlikely, he would have immediately complied with the officers' demand to drop the gun if the situation was legitimate. This casts doubt on the credibility of everyone involved, including Mr. Heyward and the deputies responding to the call.
Another problem with the official story comes from Mr. Heyward himself. As reported earlier, two armed men had shot out Mr. Heyward's brother's window. Yet, according to the 911 call, Mr. Heyward states, "He's in my house," indicating there was only one intruder. What happened to the second gunman?
Either there was one gunman or two. If one, then Mr. Heyward and CCSO deputies lied in their statements. If two, then Mr. Heyward needs to read his script better when me makes his next fake 911 call.
More problems begin to surface. Presumably, the two men who shot out the window in the mobile home stuck around for almost nine minutes after the initial incident only to ride away on bicycles while being chased by police. While this may happen in extreme cases, the lack of items that the supposed robbers had on their persons suggest that there was no robbery, at least on the part of the two men riding away on bicycles.
The next problem is the grandmother. She stated that someone told her to call 911 because "someone was shooting at someone," and that she did see two people riding through on her driveway on bicycles. This means that the grandmother not only lives next door to Mr. Heyward and his brother, but also that she was at home at the time of the supposed incident. How is it then that she saw the two men that police officers saw riding through her driveway (which is connected to Mr. Heyward's) at the same time as the incident occurred, yet did not hear any shots fired nor see police chase after the two men on bikes that she saw. The police would have pulled up to the trailer just as the men were riding into the back yard. The answer: It did not happen as the police and Mr. Heyward said it did.
Now we move to the location Mr. Heyward was discovered. According to the official story (as related in the Post and Courier), Mr. Heyward was found at the back door of his house at the time of his shooting. Yet the 911 call clearly places him in the laundry room of his home at the same time, this being indicated by the loud noise heard on the 911 tape. Did Mr. Heyward walk into the laundry room after he was shot by police in the neck then manage to get into an altercation with them, then hang up the phone? I think not. Safer it is to say that Mr. Heyward and the police set up some kind of deal beforehand to fake a shooting incident, although to what end is only speculation at this point.
Although there is more that can be brought out here regarding the falsity of the official police story, an end is being made here. Sufficient is the evidence already presented that blows a hole the case for a shooting being presented by police. As far as Mr. Heyward being shot in the neck, it appears to be a fake, just like the rest of the official police story.
Tuesday, April 14, 2015
Killing Of Walter Scott Being Covered Up By Police; Seen As Initiation Into Police "Brotherhood"
By: Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent
The following is an expounding of what happened in the shooting of Walter Scott. It shows that Michael Slager, the police officer that shot and killed him, did it in cold blood, possibly as part of an initiation ritual designed to prove the loyalty of an officer for admittance into a secret police "brotherhood." Words in italics are mine.
North Charleston officer chuckled about adrenaline rush after shooting Walter Scott
'Everything's OK. ... I just shot somebody,' Officer Michael Slager says in a call
By Jason Sickles, Yahoo
Yahoo News
Shortly after fatally shooting Walter Scott in the back, North Charleston police Officer Michael Slager nervously chuckled about his adrenaline "pumping," but also assured a caller that things would be all right, according to new audio clips published by two media outlets.
"Hey. Hey, everything's OK, OK?" Slager says in a phone call to someone believed to be his pregnant wife. "I just shot somebody. Yeah, he's OK."
(Why did Officer Scott call his wife after shooting Walter Scott? The only thing that comes to mind is Officer Slager knew the shooting was on purpose and called his wife in an attempt to deceive her before the news of him planting evidence, which is suggestive of a purposeful killing, reached her.)
If Slager meant Scott, then he wasn't OK. Slager fired his .45-caliber Glock eight times. Four bullets struck Scott in the back and one hit him in the ear. He died at the scene.
(The number of shots fired by Officer Slager suggests that he intended to kill Walter Scott. Combined with the pleasure in his voice says his adrenaline was pumping, suggests he also planned in advance to cover it up and had assurance that his fellow officers would help.)
The recording of the officer's phone call and a conversation with a supervisor at the scene doesn't show Slager -- It's audio only, from the patrolman's uniform microphone that's synched with his squad car's dashboard camera.
Last week, the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) made public 4 minutes and 22 seconds of the dashcam video showing Slager stopping Scott for a broken taillight and then giving chase when Scott took off on foot prior to the shooting.
(That the amount of dashcam video released is 4 minutes and 22 seconds is significant. As reported in another story, the number 11 is often used as a call sign to "occult" members of allegiance to a particular group or cause. The use of the number 22 (2x11) in the SLED release of dashcam footage indicates that Officer Michael Slager was "on the inside," and that SLED would be participating in the cover-up of Walter Scott's murder.
(Another indication that Officer Slager is part of "the Brotherhood" is also contained in the length of dashcam footage released. Two plus two equals four. When you put both fours beside each other you get 44, or forty-four, which is arrived at by multiplying 4x11. Since we have multiple occurrences of the number 11, this would suggest that Officer Slager's assassination of Walter Scott was ritualistic in nature, possibly an initiation into the 'Brotherhood,' a "secret" grouping of police officers who willingly cover up one anothers' crimes.)
But on Sunday, The Guardian published quotes from audio after the fatal shooting. The newspaper said Slager's patrol car picked up a total of about an hour of audio. On Monday, the Charleston Post and Courier obtained the same extended recordings.
(This statement suggests that SLED deliberately suggested that there was not much footage and any "relevant" footage would show show that Officer Slager was guilty of anything except doing his job. This is immediate proof of a cover-up by SLED, and proof that a secret "brotherhood" exists among law enforcement officials.)
Yahoo News emails to North Charleston Police and SLED, the agency investigating the shooting, were not immediately returned on Monday. Thom Berry, a spokesman for SLED, told The Guardian that he had not been able to confirm it, but that the person heard on the audio appears to have been Slager.
(The weakly delivered statement by Thom Berry, spokesman for SLED, suggests that he knew Officer Slager was trying to become one of the "in crowd" but was unable to directly deny any guilt that would be assigned to Officer Slager because of a witness's cell phone video.)
The April 4 shooting was captured on another video taken by a witness. Police and Slager initially said that Scott, 50, was shot after a skirmish over the officer's Taser stun gun. But when the witness video showed Scott being shot eight times as he ran away, Slager was fired and charged with murder. The footage also shows Slager dropping an object -- which has the appearance of a Taser -- on the ground near Scott's body.
(Another piece of evidence showing an attempt to cover up the guiltiness of Michael Slager is evidenced by the North Charleston Police Department's reaction before and after the witness video. As evidenced in the text above, the police had prepared a statement saying that Officer Slager feared for his life and thus shot and killed Walter Scott. However, when video surfaced that showed Mr. Scott running away from Officer Slager and even showed Officer Slager dropping what appeared to be a Taser near Mr. Scott, they quickly changed their story, arresting Office Slager and charging him with murder.
(But what about the number 50 since the number 11 is being used? In the Bible, the number 50 is connected to the year of jubilee, a time of great celebration for the Israelites. It is possible that Officer Slager went through both the beginning and advanced stages of initiation into the 'Brotherhood' and completed them successfully. The killing of Walter Scott appears to have been the final 'capstone' signifying his complete allegiance. This would have been met with much celebration, likely in a private ceremony away from his girlfriend.)
In the audio clip the newspaper posted online, Slager answers a call after what sounds like an iPhone ringtone. After assuring the caller that he is OK, he appears to briefly describe what happened.
"He grabbed my Taser, yeah. Yeah, he was running from me. I'm good. I just wanted to let you know."
(This appears to be the pregnant girlfriend.)
Through a spokeswoman, Andy Savage, Slager's defense attorney, declined to discuss the new audio recordings.
The conversation between Slager and the unidentified supervisor appears to come from inside a patrol car. The dialogue is standard fare following an officer-involved shooting, but the sort of stuff that is rarely heard by the public.
"What happens next?" Slager, an officer for five years, can be heard asking. The supervisor tells him he'll be transported to police headquarters before being taken home.
"Take your crap off, take your vest off, kind of relax for two or three," the senior officer says.
(What is meant here is two or three days.)
"It'll be real quick," he continues. "They're gonna tell you you're gonna be out for a couple of days, and you'll come back and they'll interview you then. They're not going to ask you any kind of questions right now. They'll take your weapon and we'll go from there. That's pretty much it."
(This describes Officer Slager's supervisor telling him what will happen as part of the cover-up. It would seem that not only is Officer Slager and his supervisor invovled, but also other police in the department as well.)
The supervisor tells Slager that it is likely to be a few days before he has to give an official account of what happened.
(What is not visible to the naked eye is the fact that during the time of the shooting of Walter Scott and the "official" investigation into his death, Officer Slager has plenty of time to write down what happened and then change it as best he can so that his "official" story takes away the blood guiltiness of his purposeful killing of Mr. Scott.)
"The last one we had, they waited a couple of days to interview officially, like, sit down and tell what happened," he says.
(This statement let's us know that this sort of thing has happened before, on a repeated basis, and that cover-ups have been made by supervisors and internal investigators multiple times. Any statement by SLED regarding their suspicion of Officer Slager's official story are false. It is an attempt by them to cover up their own guilitiness and their attempt to cover up the existence of the brotherhood. A known symbol of "the Brotherhood" is a black flag with a blue strip across the center.)
Then he leaves him with some advice.
"By the time you get home, it would probably be a good idea to kind of jot down your thoughts on what happened," he says. "You know, once the adrenaline quits pumping."
"It's pumping," Slager says, laughing nervously.
(The distinctive sound of pleasure can be heard in Officer Slager's voice in the audio recording. This suggests that not only did Officer Slager know that shooting Michael Scott was unnecessary, but shot Mr. Scott for 'the thrill of the kill.')
Source article: http://news.yahoo.com/walter-scott-shooting-north-charleston-police-officer-michael-slager-audio-183104915.html
The following is an expounding of what happened in the shooting of Walter Scott. It shows that Michael Slager, the police officer that shot and killed him, did it in cold blood, possibly as part of an initiation ritual designed to prove the loyalty of an officer for admittance into a secret police "brotherhood." Words in italics are mine.
North Charleston officer chuckled about adrenaline rush after shooting Walter Scott
'Everything's OK. ... I just shot somebody,' Officer Michael Slager says in a call
By Jason Sickles, Yahoo
Yahoo News
Shortly after fatally shooting Walter Scott in the back, North Charleston police Officer Michael Slager nervously chuckled about his adrenaline "pumping," but also assured a caller that things would be all right, according to new audio clips published by two media outlets.
"Hey. Hey, everything's OK, OK?" Slager says in a phone call to someone believed to be his pregnant wife. "I just shot somebody. Yeah, he's OK."
(Why did Officer Scott call his wife after shooting Walter Scott? The only thing that comes to mind is Officer Slager knew the shooting was on purpose and called his wife in an attempt to deceive her before the news of him planting evidence, which is suggestive of a purposeful killing, reached her.)
If Slager meant Scott, then he wasn't OK. Slager fired his .45-caliber Glock eight times. Four bullets struck Scott in the back and one hit him in the ear. He died at the scene.
(The number of shots fired by Officer Slager suggests that he intended to kill Walter Scott. Combined with the pleasure in his voice says his adrenaline was pumping, suggests he also planned in advance to cover it up and had assurance that his fellow officers would help.)
The recording of the officer's phone call and a conversation with a supervisor at the scene doesn't show Slager -- It's audio only, from the patrolman's uniform microphone that's synched with his squad car's dashboard camera.
Last week, the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) made public 4 minutes and 22 seconds of the dashcam video showing Slager stopping Scott for a broken taillight and then giving chase when Scott took off on foot prior to the shooting.
(That the amount of dashcam video released is 4 minutes and 22 seconds is significant. As reported in another story, the number 11 is often used as a call sign to "occult" members of allegiance to a particular group or cause. The use of the number 22 (2x11) in the SLED release of dashcam footage indicates that Officer Michael Slager was "on the inside," and that SLED would be participating in the cover-up of Walter Scott's murder.
(Another indication that Officer Slager is part of "the Brotherhood" is also contained in the length of dashcam footage released. Two plus two equals four. When you put both fours beside each other you get 44, or forty-four, which is arrived at by multiplying 4x11. Since we have multiple occurrences of the number 11, this would suggest that Officer Slager's assassination of Walter Scott was ritualistic in nature, possibly an initiation into the 'Brotherhood,' a "secret" grouping of police officers who willingly cover up one anothers' crimes.)
But on Sunday, The Guardian published quotes from audio after the fatal shooting. The newspaper said Slager's patrol car picked up a total of about an hour of audio. On Monday, the Charleston Post and Courier obtained the same extended recordings.
(This statement suggests that SLED deliberately suggested that there was not much footage and any "relevant" footage would show show that Officer Slager was guilty of anything except doing his job. This is immediate proof of a cover-up by SLED, and proof that a secret "brotherhood" exists among law enforcement officials.)
Yahoo News emails to North Charleston Police and SLED, the agency investigating the shooting, were not immediately returned on Monday. Thom Berry, a spokesman for SLED, told The Guardian that he had not been able to confirm it, but that the person heard on the audio appears to have been Slager.
(The weakly delivered statement by Thom Berry, spokesman for SLED, suggests that he knew Officer Slager was trying to become one of the "in crowd" but was unable to directly deny any guilt that would be assigned to Officer Slager because of a witness's cell phone video.)
The April 4 shooting was captured on another video taken by a witness. Police and Slager initially said that Scott, 50, was shot after a skirmish over the officer's Taser stun gun. But when the witness video showed Scott being shot eight times as he ran away, Slager was fired and charged with murder. The footage also shows Slager dropping an object -- which has the appearance of a Taser -- on the ground near Scott's body.
(Another piece of evidence showing an attempt to cover up the guiltiness of Michael Slager is evidenced by the North Charleston Police Department's reaction before and after the witness video. As evidenced in the text above, the police had prepared a statement saying that Officer Slager feared for his life and thus shot and killed Walter Scott. However, when video surfaced that showed Mr. Scott running away from Officer Slager and even showed Officer Slager dropping what appeared to be a Taser near Mr. Scott, they quickly changed their story, arresting Office Slager and charging him with murder.
(But what about the number 50 since the number 11 is being used? In the Bible, the number 50 is connected to the year of jubilee, a time of great celebration for the Israelites. It is possible that Officer Slager went through both the beginning and advanced stages of initiation into the 'Brotherhood' and completed them successfully. The killing of Walter Scott appears to have been the final 'capstone' signifying his complete allegiance. This would have been met with much celebration, likely in a private ceremony away from his girlfriend.)
In the audio clip the newspaper posted online, Slager answers a call after what sounds like an iPhone ringtone. After assuring the caller that he is OK, he appears to briefly describe what happened.
"He grabbed my Taser, yeah. Yeah, he was running from me. I'm good. I just wanted to let you know."
(This appears to be the pregnant girlfriend.)
Through a spokeswoman, Andy Savage, Slager's defense attorney, declined to discuss the new audio recordings.
The conversation between Slager and the unidentified supervisor appears to come from inside a patrol car. The dialogue is standard fare following an officer-involved shooting, but the sort of stuff that is rarely heard by the public.
"What happens next?" Slager, an officer for five years, can be heard asking. The supervisor tells him he'll be transported to police headquarters before being taken home.
"Take your crap off, take your vest off, kind of relax for two or three," the senior officer says.
(What is meant here is two or three days.)
"It'll be real quick," he continues. "They're gonna tell you you're gonna be out for a couple of days, and you'll come back and they'll interview you then. They're not going to ask you any kind of questions right now. They'll take your weapon and we'll go from there. That's pretty much it."
(This describes Officer Slager's supervisor telling him what will happen as part of the cover-up. It would seem that not only is Officer Slager and his supervisor invovled, but also other police in the department as well.)
The supervisor tells Slager that it is likely to be a few days before he has to give an official account of what happened.
(What is not visible to the naked eye is the fact that during the time of the shooting of Walter Scott and the "official" investigation into his death, Officer Slager has plenty of time to write down what happened and then change it as best he can so that his "official" story takes away the blood guiltiness of his purposeful killing of Mr. Scott.)
"The last one we had, they waited a couple of days to interview officially, like, sit down and tell what happened," he says.
(This statement let's us know that this sort of thing has happened before, on a repeated basis, and that cover-ups have been made by supervisors and internal investigators multiple times. Any statement by SLED regarding their suspicion of Officer Slager's official story are false. It is an attempt by them to cover up their own guilitiness and their attempt to cover up the existence of the brotherhood. A known symbol of "the Brotherhood" is a black flag with a blue strip across the center.)
Then he leaves him with some advice.
"By the time you get home, it would probably be a good idea to kind of jot down your thoughts on what happened," he says. "You know, once the adrenaline quits pumping."
"It's pumping," Slager says, laughing nervously.
(The distinctive sound of pleasure can be heard in Officer Slager's voice in the audio recording. This suggests that not only did Officer Slager know that shooting Michael Scott was unnecessary, but shot Mr. Scott for 'the thrill of the kill.')
Source article: http://news.yahoo.com/walter-scott-shooting-north-charleston-police-officer-michael-slager-audio-183104915.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)