Showing posts with label SLED. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SLED. Show all posts

Sunday, April 17, 2022

Mall Shooting in SC Another Gun Grab Attempt

Images one and two were transposed to the top of this article for some reason.  The information is still valid.

I found some information regarding the shooting at the Columbiana Center mall in Columbia, SC and figured I would share it with you.  If you click on the link below, you will go to the search results I got from Bing when looking up information about the shooting.  The search terms were Columbia SC mall shooting.  On page 2 of the results I noticed that one website printed the story, complete with police response, number of victims, even the reunification station set up at a nearby hotel, was printed only a half hour after the police received a 911 call in regards to the shooting, which they received around 2:03 PM.



Inline image

Notice the area in gray on http://www.thestate.com.  The second line gives a name and a time stamp as to when the article was published.  The name was Sarah Ellis.  The time stamp was April 16, 2022 2:35 PM.  This means that everything that you reach there either happened in the space of half an hour, which would be impossible, or it was all planned in advance.  Of course, if you go to the story, it will give you a post time of April 17, 2022; however, anyone with any skill in programming can have a false date posted on a web page.

Another website was even worse.  abcnews.go.com posted an article on the shooting at 12:40 PM on 04/16/2022.  Here is the proof:

Inline image

As you can see, the timestamp in the hyperlink description clearly states 12:40.  Given this information, one can only conclude that thestate.com, owned by the McClatchy Company, and abcnews.go.com, owned by Walt Disney Company, along with various police and other law enforcement agencies, conspired to arrange this shooting.

Thursday, June 18, 2015

Mass Shooting In Charleston SC A Fake; Story Posted At Least On Jun 16

By:  Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent

CHARLESTON, SC -- (WorthyNews)  A shooting inside one of South Carolina's oldest black churches appears to be a false flag event.

At approximately 12:00 AM, June 18, a web posting on Yahoo! News stated there was a shooting at a historically black church in downtown Charleston.  This was "confirmed" by a news broadcast from wltx.com, Channel 19.1 out of Columbia, SC.

However, after typing in the search criteria, "shooting inside church in Charleston SC" on Firefox, multiple online news sources, including cnn.com, abcnews.go.com, pix11.com, and nydailynews.com, all report the same story, only they posted it to their web sites on June 16, 2015, a full day before it happened, which according to the official narrative, happened around 9 PM on June 17.  A copy of the link to the search results can be found here:  https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?ei=UTF-8&type=agc511&hspart=avast&hsimp=yhs-001&p=shooting+inside+church+in+Charleston+SC.

What is interesting to note is the fact that going to each of these different sites, they all say the posts were made on either the 17th or the 18th, which is today.  This means that the entire shooting was planned some days in advance, including any supposed victims, such as the pastor, Clementa Pinckney, and the supposed gunman, who according to police has not yet been caught.

While the ultimate intentions of these actions is not clear, it appears as though it is designed to cause racial tensions between blacks and whites.  Indeed, South Carolina, especially the Charleston area, is sensitive to racial tensions, especially in the days since Walter Scott, a black man, was shot and killed by a white police officer.

The implications are staggering.  This means that not only are the members of Mother Emanuel AME Church involved in this act of trying to incite a riot by inflaming racial tensions, but also members of the Charleston Police Department, and Charleston Mayor Joe Riley who supports the obviously false narrative given by CPD Chief Greg Mullen.  Even the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division and the Federal Bureau of Investigation appear to be in on the crime.

Truly, these are wicked times we are living in.

Source article:  http://news.yahoo.com/shooting-erupts-church-charleston-south-carolina-021744448.html#
Supporting articles:  http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/17/us/charleston-south-carolina-shooting/index.html, http://abcnews.go.com/US/police-respond-shooting-charleston-south-carolina-church/story?id=31845305, http://pix11.com/2015/06/17/police-respond-to-shooting-at-charleston-south-carolina-church/, http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/charleston-church-shot-article-1.2262014, http://abc7chicago.com/news/charleston-sc-police-respond-to-shooting-at-church/791575/, http://fox4kc.com/2015/06/17/shooting-reported-at-charleston-s-c-church/, http://koin.com/ap/shooting-in-downtown-charleston-south-carolina/, http://www.wxyz.com/news/multiple-people-shot-at-charleston-south-carolina-church

UPDATE:  While searching for crime scene photos of the fake "Charleston 9" shooting, I came across yet more websites that have the story printed before the shooting even happened.  Here's the link to the search results:  https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?ei=UTF-8&type=agc511&hspart=avast&hsimp=yhs-001&p=AP+photographer+at+Emanuel+AME+Church+after+shooting

Monday, June 8, 2015

Brotherhood Of Police Stage Fake Shooting; Victim's Story Questionable

By:  Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent

HOLLYWOOD, South Carolina (WorthyNews) -- Last month, members of the Charleston County Sheriff's Office supposedly shot Brian Heyward inside his home after responding to a call at the same location.

Mr. Heyward, who lives at 5923 Scott-White Road in Hollywood, called 911 to report a break-in by two armed men just a couple of minutes after 11 AM Thursday, May 7. He said that they had already shot out his brother's window, who apparently lives in the same home.

According to the official story, deputies arrived at the scene to find two black men riding bicycles toward the mobile home's back yard. The officers chased the men, but were unable to catch them. After reaching the back of the home, they noticed a man standing near the doorway and holding a gun. The man, Brian Heyward, then confronted the officers at which point they told him to drop his weapon.  After refusing the officers' demand to drop his gun, one of the officers fired a shot, presumably hitting Mr. Heyward in the neck.

Problems now arise with the official story.  Why did Mr. Heyward, who called the police, challenge he deputies after they arrived, presumably pointing his gun at them?  Unless the deputies first threatened Mr. Heyward outside of normal procedures, which appears unlikely, he would have immediately complied with the officers' demand to drop the gun if the situation was legitimate.  This casts doubt on the credibility of everyone involved, including Mr. Heyward and the deputies responding to the call.

Another problem with the official story comes from Mr. Heyward himself.  As reported earlier, two armed men had shot out Mr. Heyward's brother's window.  Yet, according to the 911 call, Mr. Heyward states, "He's in my house," indicating there was only one intruder.  What happened to the second gunman?

Either there was one gunman or two.  If one, then Mr. Heyward and CCSO deputies lied in their statements.  If two, then Mr. Heyward needs to read his script better when me makes his next fake 911 call.

More problems begin to surface.  Presumably, the two men who shot out the window in the mobile home stuck around for almost nine minutes after the initial incident only to ride away on bicycles while being chased by police.  While this may happen in extreme cases, the lack of items that the supposed robbers had on their persons suggest that there was no robbery, at least on the part of the two men riding away on bicycles. 

The next problem is the grandmother.  She stated that someone told her to call 911 because "someone was shooting at someone," and that she did see two people riding through on her driveway on bicycles.  This means that the grandmother not only lives next door to Mr. Heyward and his brother, but also that she was at home at the time of the supposed incident.  How is it then that she saw the two men that police officers saw riding through her driveway (which is connected to Mr. Heyward's) at the same time as the incident occurred, yet did not hear any shots fired nor see police chase after the two men on bikes that she saw.  The police would have pulled up to the trailer just as the men were riding into the back yard.  The answer:  It did not happen as the police and Mr. Heyward said it did.

Now we move to the location Mr. Heyward was discovered.  According to the official story (as related in the Post and Courier), Mr. Heyward was found at the back door of his house at the time of his shooting.  Yet the 911 call clearly places him in the laundry room of his home at the same time, this being indicated by the loud noise heard on the 911 tape.  Did Mr. Heyward walk into the laundry room after he was shot by police in the neck then manage to get into an altercation with them, then hang up the phone?  I think not.  Safer it is to say that Mr. Heyward and the police set up some kind of deal beforehand to fake a shooting incident, although to what end is only speculation at this point.

Although there is more that can be brought out here regarding the falsity of the official police story, an end is being made here.  Sufficient is the evidence already presented that blows a hole the case for a shooting being presented by police.  As far as Mr. Heyward being shot in the neck, it appears to be a fake, just like the rest of the official police story.

Tuesday, April 14, 2015

Killing Of Walter Scott Being Covered Up By Police; Seen As Initiation Into Police "Brotherhood"

By:  Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent

The following is an expounding of what happened in the shooting of Walter Scott.  It shows that Michael Slager, the police officer that shot and killed him, did it in cold blood, possibly as part of an initiation ritual designed to prove the loyalty of an officer for admittance into a secret police "brotherhood."  Words in italics are mine.


North Charleston officer chuckled about adrenaline rush after shooting Walter Scott

'Everything's OK. ... I just shot somebody,' Officer Michael Slager says in a call

By Jason Sickles, Yahoo
Yahoo News

Shortly after fatally shooting Walter Scott in the back, North Charleston police Officer Michael Slager nervously chuckled about his adrenaline "pumping," but also assured a caller that things would be all right, according to new audio clips published by two media outlets.

"Hey. Hey, everything's OK, OK?" Slager says in a phone call to someone believed to be his pregnant wife. "I just shot somebody. Yeah, he's OK."

        (Why did Officer Scott call his wife after shooting Walter Scott?  The only thing that comes to mind is Officer Slager knew the shooting was on purpose and called his wife in an attempt to deceive her before the news of him planting evidence, which is suggestive of a purposeful killing, reached her.)

If Slager meant Scott, then he wasn't OK. Slager fired his .45-caliber Glock eight times. Four bullets struck Scott in the back and one hit him in the ear. He died at the scene.

        (The number of shots fired by Officer Slager suggests that he intended to kill Walter Scott.  Combined with the pleasure in his voice says his adrenaline was pumping, suggests he also planned in advance to cover it up and had assurance that his fellow officers would help.)

The recording of the officer's phone call and a conversation with a supervisor at the scene doesn't show Slager -- It's audio only, from the patrolman's uniform microphone that's synched with his squad car's dashboard camera.

Last week, the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) made public 4 minutes and 22 seconds of the dashcam video showing Slager stopping Scott for a broken taillight and then giving chase when Scott took off on foot prior to the shooting.

        (That the amount of dashcam video released is 4 minutes and 22 seconds is significant.  As reported in another story, the number 11 is often used as a call sign to "occult" members of allegiance to a particular group or cause.  The use of the number 22 (2x11) in the SLED release of dashcam footage indicates that Officer Michael Slager was "on the inside," and that SLED would be participating in the cover-up of Walter Scott's murder.

        (Another indication that Officer Slager is part of "the Brotherhood" is also contained in the length of dashcam footage released.  Two plus two equals four.  When you put both fours beside each other you get 44, or forty-four, which is arrived at by multiplying 4x11.  Since we have multiple occurrences of the number 11, this would suggest that Officer Slager's assassination of Walter Scott was ritualistic in nature, possibly an initiation into the 'Brotherhood,' a "secret" grouping of police officers who willingly cover up one anothers' crimes.)

But on Sunday, The Guardian published quotes from audio after the fatal shooting. The newspaper said Slager's patrol car picked up a total of about an hour of audio. On Monday, the Charleston Post and Courier obtained the same extended recordings.

        (This statement suggests that SLED deliberately suggested that there was not much footage and any "relevant" footage would show show that Officer Slager was guilty of anything except doing his job.  This is immediate proof of a cover-up by SLED, and proof that a secret "brotherhood" exists among law enforcement officials.)

Yahoo News emails to North Charleston Police and SLED, the agency investigating the shooting, were not immediately returned on Monday. Thom Berry, a spokesman for SLED, told The Guardian that he had not been able to confirm it, but that the person heard on the audio appears to have been Slager.

        (The weakly delivered statement by Thom Berry, spokesman for SLED, suggests that he knew Officer Slager was trying to become one of the "in crowd" but was unable to directly deny any guilt that would be assigned to Officer Slager because of a witness's cell phone video.)

The April 4 shooting was captured on another video taken by a witness. Police and Slager initially said that Scott, 50, was shot after a skirmish over the officer's Taser stun gun. But when the witness video showed Scott being shot eight times as he ran away, Slager was fired and charged with murder. The footage also shows Slager dropping an object -- which has the appearance of a Taser -- on the ground near Scott's body.

        (Another piece of evidence showing an attempt to cover up the guiltiness of Michael Slager is evidenced by the North Charleston Police Department's reaction before and after the witness video.  As evidenced in the text above, the police had prepared a statement saying that Officer Slager feared for his life and thus shot and killed Walter Scott.  However, when video surfaced that showed Mr. Scott running away from Officer Slager and even showed Officer Slager dropping what appeared to be a Taser near Mr. Scott, they quickly changed their story, arresting Office Slager and charging him with murder.

        (But what about the number 50 since the number 11 is being used?  In the Bible, the number 50 is connected to the year of jubilee, a time of great celebration for the Israelites.  It is possible that Officer Slager went through both the beginning and advanced stages of initiation into the 'Brotherhood' and completed them successfully.  The killing of Walter Scott appears to have been the final 'capstone' signifying his complete allegiance.  This would have been met with much celebration, likely in a private ceremony away from his girlfriend.)

In the audio clip the newspaper posted online, Slager answers a call after what sounds like an iPhone ringtone. After assuring the caller that he is OK, he appears to briefly describe what happened.

"He grabbed my Taser, yeah. Yeah, he was running from me. I'm good. I just wanted to let you know."

        (This appears to be the pregnant girlfriend.)

Through a spokeswoman, Andy Savage, Slager's defense attorney, declined to discuss the new audio recordings.

The conversation between Slager and the unidentified supervisor appears to come from inside a patrol car. The dialogue is standard fare following an officer-involved shooting, but the sort of stuff that is rarely heard by the public.

"What happens next?" Slager, an officer for five years, can be heard asking. The supervisor tells him he'll be transported to police headquarters before being taken home.

"Take your crap off, take your vest off, kind of relax for two or three," the senior officer says.

        (What is meant here is two or three days.)

"It'll be real quick," he continues. "They're gonna tell you you're gonna be out for a couple of days, and you'll come back and they'll interview you then. They're not going to ask you any kind of questions right now. They'll take your weapon and we'll go from there. That's pretty much it."

        (This describes Officer Slager's supervisor telling him what will happen as part of the cover-up.  It would seem that not only is Officer Slager and his supervisor invovled, but also other police in the department as well.)

The supervisor tells Slager that it is likely to be a few days before he has to give an official account of what happened.

        (What is not visible to the naked eye is the fact that during the time of the shooting of Walter Scott and the "official" investigation into his death, Officer Slager has plenty of time to write down what happened and then change it as best he can so that his "official" story takes away the blood guiltiness of his purposeful killing of Mr. Scott.)

"The last one we had, they waited a couple of days to interview officially, like, sit down and tell what happened," he says.

        (This statement let's us know that this sort of thing has happened before, on a repeated basis, and that cover-ups have been made by supervisors and internal investigators multiple times.  Any statement by SLED regarding their suspicion of Officer Slager's official story are false.  It is an attempt by them to cover up their own guilitiness and their attempt to cover up the existence of the brotherhood.  A known symbol of "the Brotherhood" is a black flag with a blue strip across the center.)

Then he leaves him with some advice.

"By the time you get home, it would probably be a good idea to kind of jot down your thoughts on what happened," he says. "You know, once the adrenaline quits pumping."

"It's pumping," Slager says, laughing nervously.

        (The distinctive sound of pleasure can be heard in Officer Slager's voice in the audio recording.  This suggests that not only did Officer Slager know that shooting Michael Scott was unnecessary, but shot Mr. Scott for 'the thrill of the kill.')



Source article:  http://news.yahoo.com/walter-scott-shooting-north-charleston-police-officer-michael-slager-audio-183104915.html

Saturday, March 28, 2015

Boston Cop Shot In the Line Of Duty; City Officials Attempt Cover-up

By:  Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent

Article taken from  http://news.yahoo.com/boston-cop-coma-since-being-shot-face-suspect-122447112.html

Decorated Boston cop in coma after being shot in face

BOSTON (AP) -- A decorated Boston police officer remained in a medically induced coma Saturday, a night after he was shot in the face during a traffic stop that ended when other officers fatally shot his attacker, the city's police commissioner said.

Officer John Moynihan, 34, was struck just below his right eye and the bullet remains lodged below his right ear. He was listed in critical condition, Commissioner William Evans said.

Evans said Moynihan is undergoing tests and is being monitored for bleeding in his brain. "We are hoping and praying there's not further damage," Evans said.

"He's a fighter. I am sure he's going to pull through," the commissioner said.

Moynihan and five other gang task force members, traveling in two cars, stopped a car Friday night after reports of shots fired, Evans said.

The commissioner said the officers had blue lights flashing but none had pulled out their weapons. He said video from the scene shows Moynihan approaching the driver's door, and the suspect, Angelo West, 41, of Boston's Hyde Park neighborhood, suddenly pull a gun and shoot him at point blank range.

        (Six cops pulling over a car after a report of shots fired and they DON'T have their guns drawn?!?  Commissioner Evans is lying through his teeth!  It appears at this point that Angelo West is a mark rather than a gang-banging thug.)

Evans said West continued firing at the other officers as he tried to run away, emptying his .357 Magnum handgun, and was killed at the scene when police returned fire. West had a violent criminal past with several prior gun convictions, according to West.

        (Always good saying the man that got killed had a violent criminal past to make sure the public think the victim is seen as a monster.  This is a planted statement.  Did you also notice that Mr. West was from the Hyde Park neighborhood?  As is Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, with Hyde being a homicidal monster?)

A woman driving by in a car suffered a flesh wound and is recovering and was in good spirits, evans said. Three other officers were taken to a hospital with stress-related problems.

        (Appears to be a pile of crap given Commissioner Evans' lying testimony.)

Mayor Marty Walsh said Moynihan and the other victim are in his prayers.

"I have spoken with Officer Moynihan's family and Commissioner Evans and I am hopeful that under the experienced and talented team at Boston Medical Center the officer will continue on a strong path to recovery," Walsh said.

        (Kiss Officer Moynihan good-bye.  The 'gracious' description of the skill at Boston Medical Center on the part of Mayor Walsh suggests that he is in on the targeted shooting of Officer Moynihan.  If he doesn't die, it will be because someone in the city of Boston saw this article.)

Moynihan, 34, is on the police Youth Violence Task Force and is a highly decorated military veteran, Evans said.

        (More fluff given to make Angelo West seem like the monster he is probably not.  This case appears reminiscent of the murder of Vamond Elmore in South Carolina by US Marshals and members of the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED).  They are really trying to make Angelo West look like a monster, making sure the patriots of the United States know one of their own was killed.

        (It now appears that Officer Moynihan is the object of the assassination rather than Angelo West.  I guess he just happened to be "some dumb nigger" that got selected for sacrifice.)

He is a former Army ranger who served in Iraq in 2006-2007 and was honored at the White House in May with the National Association of Police Organizations TOP COPS award. Moynihan received the award for being one of the first responders in Watertown following the April 2013 gun battle with the Boston Marathon bombing suspects.

        (Not trying to speak ill of the dead, but the fact that he was honored by President Obama at the White House suggests that Officer Moynihan was crooked, given that President Obama honored him, especially if he took knowledgeable part in the 2013 Boston Marathon occult-style mind rape perpetrated by members of the United States government.  Still doesn't take away from his murder, though.)

Moynihan had helped transit police Officer Richard Donohue, who was shot in the leg and nearly bled to death when police tried to apprehend Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, Lieutenant Michael McCarthy said.

        (Not sure if this is a planted statement.  Whether it is or not, it seems to suggest that Officer Moynihan did something that his corrupt brothers in blue did not like, perhaps even doing something that President Obama did not like given that he was a former Army Ranger, and he was killed for it.)

Evans said Moynihan is single, and his girlfriend, sister and other relatives were at the hospital along with clergy members.

Two other people in the car with West have not been charged in the shooting, Evans said, but are held on unrelated outstanding charges.

District Attorney Daniel Conley said the top prosecutor from his office will investigate the killing of West as state law requires and it will be "completely transparent."

        (District Attorney Daniel Conley is in on Officer Moynihan's attempted killing.  You can tell by his use of the statement, "completely transparent."  Ofttimes when a person tries to deflect attention away from themselves they will say they are going to be "completely transparent" or something like it.  This gets the reader to automatically assume that the person talking always tells the truth.)

Such shootings are rare in Boston,but firearms are a major concern in the city, the commissioner said.

        (Guns, a.k.a. firearms, are a major concern to who?  The people of Boston?  Or the corrupt city officials running the place?  P.S. No accusation placed on those that are innocent.

A clergymen and anti-violence leader, the Rev. Mark Scott of the Azusa Christian Community, said he is praying for Moynihan and his family, and for a neighborhood that has been plagued by violence.

"There is much work that people have done with the police that has made our community a lot safer," he said.

        (Even the churches are corrupt in Boston!  Rev. Scott of the Azusa Christian Community is on the take to the police commissioner, either through direct association or indirect association.  His statement deflects the assignment of trouble from the police to the public and suggests that the public are the ones that need to improve in the area of righteousness.)

For information regarding the shooting of Vamond Elmore, please go to:  http://conspiracyprophecyguy.blogspot.com/2014/08/killer-cops-vamond-elmore-case.html

Tuesday, September 9, 2014

Killer Cops: The Vamond Elmore Case, Part 2

By:  Marshall Ramsey II, Worthynews.com U.S. Correspondent

Vamond Elmore Case

Players: U.S. Marshals, SLED, DCSO, CCSO

Name of Operation: Operation Intercept

Duration: Six Weeks

        "Operation Intercept" ended on July 22, 2014.  Six weeks back from that is June 10.  The crime Mr. Elmore supposedly committed took place on May 15.  A search warrant was obtained on May 28, 2014.  Since SLED (South Carolina Law Enforcement Division) was in it from the beginning, this means that top SLED officials were contacted prior to June 10 by top U.S. Marshals officials, such as Kelvin Washington, U.S. Marshals head of South Carolina.

        It stands to reason that since U.S. Marshals (USM) were in charge of the case (as they would be since Mr. Elmore crossed state lines), Operation Intercept would have been started by the head of the United States Marshals in Connecticut (CT), Joseph P. Faughnan.  He would have been the one to contact Kelvin Washington, head of the United States Marshals Service in South Carolina.

        A period of 13 days went by before USM and SLED began Operation Intercept.  During this time, both Mr. Washington and SLED Chief Mark Keel were contacted about plans to murder Vamond Elmore, to which both agreed.  Officials from the Dorchester County Sheriff's Office (L.C. Knight) and Charleston County Sheriff's Office (Al Cannon) were also contacted at some point, told of the plans to kill Mr. Elmore in St. George to which they also agreed.  (Most of the players mentioned in Part 1, titled 'Killer Cops: The Vamond Elmore Case' had unfavorable news articles published online by me.  Mr. Elmore was never the real target.)

        Earlier press releases in CT had Norwalk police (Detective Justin Bisceglie, lead investigator; Lt. Thomas Mattera, detective bureau commander) Lt. Thomas Mattera "very happy with the detective squads  in getting the arrest warrant."(1)  This suggests evidence at the scene was inconclusive as to who actually shot Jimmy Martinez, the victim in the case that was supposed to be the start of Operation Intercept.

        Why then were they so certain it was Vamond Elmore who shot Mr. Martinez?  Was it evidence?  No.  If they had to work hard to get the evidence, then there was not enough evidence at the scene to implicate Mr. Elmore in the murder.  This suggests that Mr. Elmore was singled out for execution before Mr. Martinez was killed.

        Again, if Lt. Mattera's departments worked hard to gather evidence for Vamond Elmore's arrest warrant, why were they still looking for witnesses?

        "'We will be continuing to interview witnesses and looking for witnesses,' he [Mattera] said."(1)

        This statement suggests at least two things:  1) It suggests Lt. Mattera had it in for Mr. Elmore from before Mr. Martinez' murder; 2) It suggests that Lt. Mattera got a judge to issue an arrest warrant based on little to no conclusive evidence.  Remember,  Lt. Mattera has already obtained a search warrant, and is yet still looking for additional witnesses.  This suggests that Lt. Mattera's case against Mr. Elmore is shakier than he is letting on.

        Or perhaps an arrest warrant for the apprehension of Vamond Elmore is not the real objective?  Evidence to back up this claim can be found in an earlier article on the subject of Mr. Elmore's death.(2)  In any case, the evidence is mounting against USM, SLED, DCSO (Sheriff Knight), and CCSO (Sheriff Cannon) and now includes Norwalk, CT police and possibly a judge, maybe a federal judge since Mr. Elmore's case crosses state lines.

        If Mr. Elmore is guilty of murder (which evidence suggest hi isn't), then there is no good reason for USM to wait so long before taking action against him.  There is certainly no need for them to wait 13 days before tracking Mr. Elmore's movements for six weeks during Operation Intercept, especially after waiting 13 days to obtain an arrest warrant.

        The evidence suggests Mr. Elmore's location was known from Day 1, and that USM & Norwalk PD played a cat-and-mouse game, waiting for Vamond Elmore to reach St. George before being killed execution-style.  A question now arises:  Since evidence suggests that I am the real target of the players involved and the 'cause' of both Mr. Elmore's and Mr. Martinez' death (though I did not kill them), Is there someone hiding in the shadows even more powerful than the United States Marshals Service that wants me dead?  Since we are dealing with national law enforcement (US Marshals), perhaps I have printed an unfavorable report against someone in Washington, D.C., someone who would benefit greatly from my "permanent" silence?  Who knows where this case will end up next?

        More to come, God willing.

(1) http://www.thehour.com/news/norwalk/norwalk-police-obtain-warrant-for-murder-suspect/article_70e07a84-e661-11e3-a7a5-001a4bcf6878.html
(2) http://conspiracyprophecyguy.blogspot.com/2014/08/killer-cops-vamond-elmore-case.html

Friday, August 1, 2014

Killer Cops: The Vamond Elmore Case

By:  Marshall Ramsey II, WorthyNews.com U.S. Correspondent

SAINT GEORGE, SC (WorthyNews) -- A very interesting week and a half in the life of Saint George, SC.  A man wanted in Connecticut for murder was murdered by law enforcement officials from the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division.

The man's name was Vamond Elmore.  The crime he was charged with was murder.  What actually happened is far worse:  Vamond Elmore was murdered by the very people that are supposed to protect us from people like Mr. Elmore.

Below is a story I wrote on paper on July 24, 2014, just two days after Mr. Elmore was killed.  This is not a pretty story.  Quite possibly, it is one that will have you looking over your shoulder as you drive down the street, suspecting every police encounter you have or see.  It involves law enforcement officials in four different jurisdictions, up to and including the United States Marshals Service.  Here goes...



       On July 22, Vamond Elmore, 37, of Norwalk, CT, was killed by two agents of the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) outside of the Southern Inn motel around 11:15 AM.  Mr. Elmore was wanted for murder in Connecticut in the killing of Jimmy 'Flaco' Martinez.  By many accounts, Elmore got what he deserved.  However, conflicting official stories suggest something far more disturbing.

       I am not trying to take away anything from the family and friends of Jimmy Martinez, nor am I trying to excuse Mr. Elmore's alleged actions.  If Vamond Elmore killed Jimmy Martinez in cold blood then he needed to be brought to justice.  However, cops with a taste for blood are a far greater danger.

       On May 15, 2014, Jimmy 'Flaco' Martinez was found dead at 2:16 AM on Leonard Street in central Norwalk.  An arrest warrant for Mr. Elmore was obtained on May 28th for Vamond Arqui Elmore, known by the street name, Wooley King.  U.S. Marshal deputies, assisted by SLED agents, approached the Southern Inn where Elmore was staying, whom they had been tracking for some time.

       According to Major Eric Watson of the Charleston County Sheriff's Office (CCSO), a foot chase was begun between Mr. Elmore and U.S. Marshals and SLED agents.  Mr. Elmore then pulled out a handgun, "presented" it to the pursuing officers, and that's when the SLED agents opened fire, fatally wounding him.  Maj. Watson did not say if Mr. Elmore had fired a shot, and given the context of the statement he gave the Eagle-Record, a local newspaper, no shot can be said to have been fired by Mr. Elmore.

       Now let's look at the problems with this.

       Problem #1:  An unidentified woman staying at the motel at the time of the killing said she heard (she was in her room at the time of the incident) a single shot, which she thought at first was a firecracker, and a few seconds later she heard several shots in rapid succession, then silence.  All of this presents a continual flow of events from the first shot to the silence at the end of the several shots.

       The rapid succession shots undoubtedly belonged to the SLED agents.  But what about the single shot heard seconds before?  If Mr. Elmore did not fire a shot, as can be reasonably concluded from Major Watson's statement, and no other shots were reported except fromt he officers on the scene, one can only conclude that one of the officers (whether U.S. Marshals or SLED agents) on the scene fired that single shot.

       This, then, brings up a couple of issues:  1) Why did the "police" fire one shot, wait a few seconds, and then fire several more shots at Mr. Elmore?  2) Given the chain of events as given by the unidentified woman and backed up by Major Watson (CCSO), Mr. Elmore's death appears pre-meditated, meaning the U.S. Marshals who would have been in charge of Vamond Elmore's arrest since the crime committed by him originated in another state, had no intention of taking Mr. Elmore into custody.  Why?

       Given that SLED agents fired the successive shots at Mr. Elmore, it appears that SLED agents had knowledge of the intent of the U.S. Marshals and were willing participants in the murder of Mr. Elmore.

       Problem #2:  U.S. Marshals had been tracking Vamond Elmore for some time.  They only made a move on him after gaining certain information about him.  If the U.S. Marshals and SLED agents already knew where he was, why didn't they arrest him immediately?  What was this information they needed?  The only conclusion one can draw is that they were concerned about jurisdiction, that is, what police agency had jurisdiction over the Southern Inn.

       Being a security guard by paid profession, I learned in training that if a crime happens, depending on where it occurs, different law enforcement agencies take control of the investigation.  For example, if a crime happens inside city limits, then local police handle the case.  However, if a crime happens outside of city limits, then it becomes the particular county of occurrence's responsibility.  Since we already know that agents from the U.S. Marshals Service and SLED planned in advance to kill Mr. Elmore, it appears as though they were planning to either buy off the particular agency in whose jurisdiction the crime (US Marshals and SLED's) was committed, invite them to participate in the killing, or they were trying to avoid attention from an unfriendly law enforcement agency.

       Problem #3:  According to the article in the Eagle-Record, an unidentified local resident and his wife was going to have an early lunch at the Taco Bell across the street about the time Mr. Elmore was killed.  Upon seeing police in the parking lot of the hotel (motel according to other sources), he turned around and pulled into the BP gas station which is directly in front of the hotel (Southern Inn).  Upon seeing police beginning to tape off the crime scene and as EMS arrived, the man then walked up to Mr. Elmore's body and saw a "young, black man" lying spread eagle on his back, with blood "streaming" from his short dreadlocks.

       This man, if legitimate, appears to have been impersonating an Emergency Medical Services (EMS) worker in an attempt to gain access to the crime scene.  Having had dealings with EMS services for family members, I can tell you that they all have some kind of visible marker identifying themselves as EMS.  This random citizen on his way to an early lunch would not have had such markers.

       A police officer with one eye would have been able to spot him, at which point the man would have been ejected from the crime scene.  This suggests the unidentified man was invited to be part of the action, which means that SLED and/or US Marshals contacted this man in advance and told him of their plans to kill Vamond Elmore and cover up the murder, to which he agreed.  This, in turn, means that United States Marshals (USM) and SLED knew Vamond Elmore was going to be in Saint George at this time and wanted him to be killed in St. George.  Why?  What is it about the town of Saint George that presented an ideal killing spot when USM could have killed him (Mr. Elmore) somewhere else?

       Problem #4:  The killing took place in upper Dorchester county, South Carolina, not in Charleston county, the jurisdiction of Maj. Watson.  According to the aforementioned article, in the Eagle-Record, within minutes of the shooting, both DCSO and CCSO officers were on the scene.  A map of Charleston county on www.sciway.net reveals that Saint George is a long way away from any part of Charleston county.

       The term "within minutes" seems to imply a time frame of ten minutes or less.  Dorchester County sheriffs are one thing, but Charleston County sheriffs on the scene of a crime in Saint George within minutes is quite another.

        I drive almost 50 miles to work one way, five days a week.  Usually I take to Interstate travel due to a shorter travel time.  Even at the speed of 70 miles per hour (the maximum speed allowed on Interstates 26 & 95) it takes me over 30 minutes to get to work, not to mention the additional time it takes when speed limits are cut nearly in half for non-Interstate travel.

       In order for CCSO officers to reach the Southern Inn "within minutes," they could have been no more than 15 to 20 miles away at the time.  This would place them outside of their jurisdiction at the time they wee brought in to take over the investigation.  The only conclusion one can draw is that they also knew in advance that Vamond Elmore was going to be killed.

       With crime happening in one county and a different county in charge in charge of the investigation, jurisdictional issues arise.  The only way a law enforcement agency from one county can investigate a crime in another county, unless perhaps the crime starts inside the first county or happens on a county line, is that there be an agreement between the two counties for this investigation to take place.

       According to the article in the Eagle-Record, Charleston Sheriff "Al" Cannon agreed to oversee the investigation of the Vamond Elmore shooting "as his agency was not directly involved" in the incident and according to CCSO's Eric Watson, the two SLED agents who shot Mr. Elmore were placed on paid administrative leave immediately after the incident.  This tells us that:  1) There was an agreement between DCSO officials and Charleston County Sheriffs officials for CCSO to take over the investigation.  Given the speed with which Charleston County police arrived to the scene, that agreement must have been made in advance, with prior knowledge on the part of DCSO and CCSO officers that Mr. Elmore was going to be murdered; 2) Sheriff Cannon stated his agency was not "directly involved" in Mr. Elmore's shooting.  With this statement, Sheriff Cannon admits that he had prior knowledge of the events that unfolded on July 22, 2014, that resulted in the death of Vamond Elmore, and that his agency was involved.  This seems to indicate that Sheriff Cannon aided US Marshals (spelled Marshalls in the Eagle-Record account), SLED, and Dorchester County Sheriffs in the planning and/or cover up of Mr. Elmore's murder; 3) Given the speed with which the two SLED agents were placed on paid administrative leave suggests that top level South Carolina Law Enforcement Division officials knew in advance that questions would be asked about the details of Mr. Elmore's death and wanted to paint themselves in a good light before bad press could get out.  (The only time a SLED agent is placed on paid administrative leave is when an investigation is ongoing and questions about officer conduct have risen);

       But this is not the end of the matter.  We also have the contradictory statements made by police officials.  In one instance, as related by Major Watson, Vamond Elmore was outside the hotel room with his gun "tucked in" (presumably his pants) which he pulled out after a footrace had begun.  This statement was found in the July 24, 2014 edition of The Eagle-Record.  In another instance, in an article found in the July 23, 2014 edition of the Post & Courier, Mr. Elmore was seen walking out of his hotel room (motel in other articles), pistol in hand.  This statement appears to have been put out by the U.S. Marshals Service in a news release published by them.  Clearly someone is lying.

       Again, Mr. Elmore was in one article apparently dead at the scene of the shooting and his body flown to MUSC (Medical University of South Carolina), and in another article, he died at MUSC, meaning Mr. Elmore was still alive when the helicopter arrived to fly him there.  Another instance of contradictory statements.

       And yet again, in the Eagle-Record coverage of events, Mr. Elmore was pronounced dead of (gunshot) wounds.  In this account, parentheses are around the letter 's' in wounds.  This implies that Mr. Elmore died of a single gunshot wound , presumably to the head as evidenced by the blood "streaming" from Mr. Elmore's dreadlocks and the single shot heard by the unknown hotel guest, which was followed by a pause, and then the multiple shots in rapid succession fired by SLED agents.  Clearly, this was a carefully orchestrated event.

       Another question that needs to be asked is, "Why did evidence of the "shooting" get sent to the Georgia State Patrol?"  Prudence would dictate that the evidence be handled in-state, where results could be received in a more timely manner.  So why send the evidence to Georgia?  Perhaps the forensics department of SLED would be seen as being too obvious, meaning the intentions of the US Marshals, SLED, DCSO, and CCSO, were to kill Vamond Elmore and cover it up.

       According to another news source, it appears that Mr. Elmore may not be guilty of murder at all, but rather was guilty of selling illegal drugs.  In the source, Mr. Elmore appears to have been targeted for arrest in something called Operation Intercept.  Operation Intercept was a program started by former U.S. President Richard Nixon in 1969 in an effort to curb the flow of marijuana from Mexico.  The program lasted for about 20 days.  At 37 years of age, this puts Vamond Elmore and his arrest for drugs way out of the range of possibility, thus lending further credence to the suggestion that his murder was planned in advance.

       But why St. George?  What is it about this area that seemed the ideal location?  Is there a connection between the town of Saint George and all these different agencies?

       Given that the murder was supposed to take place in South Carolina, in the town of Saint George, and news accounts making mention of the 'fact' that Mr. Elmore had extensive family connections in Dorchester County (If he really had so many family connections, why wasn't he staying with them?), perhaps the connection has to do with a person?

       The answer lies with me.  I am the connection.  Each agency involved in the Vamond Elmore murder has had me beforehand drawing a connection between themselves and criminal activity.

       From county and state law enforcement agencies all the way to the US Marshals Service, every agency involved had been implicated in some form of criminal activity and/or cover up of the activity.  With Sheriff Al Cannon and CCSO, the murder of Ronald Ratliff; with the Dorchester County Sheriff's office, the murder of Michael Westbury (A Captain Phinney was involved in this instance); with SLED, possible cover-up of the murder of Ronald Ratliff and Ronald Smith; with Georgia State Patrol (not them but their sister organization the Georgia Bureau of Investigation) and US Marshals, a school shooting in DeKalb County Georgia.

       Clearly, there are wicked men in high places doing wicked things.

http://norwalk.dailyvoice.com/police-fire/norwalk-police-identify-homicide-victim-found-leonard-street
http://www.thehour.com/news/update-norwalk-police-identify-shooting-victim-as-jimmy-martinez/article_6c299576-dc0b-11e3-8cda-001a4bcf6878.html
The Dorchester Eagle-Record, July 24, 2014, Page 1, 4
The Post and Courier, July 23, 2014, 1A, 4A
http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&orgId=533&topicId=157130008&docId=l:2169721772&Em=7&start=64
http://www.sciway.net/maps/cnty/dorchester.html
http://www.sciway.net/maps/cnty/charleston.html
http://conspiracyprophecyguy.blogspot.com/2014/05/michael-westbury-61-of-grover-sc.html
http://conspiracyprophecyguy.blogspot.com/2012/09/fw-investigation-request.html
http://conspiracyprophecyguy.blogspot.com/2013/08/school-shooting-in-georgia-false-flag.html
http://conspiracyprophecyguy.blogspot.com/2013/10/st-stephen-south-carolina-police.html
http://wtnh.com/2014/07/22/conn-man-wanted-for-murder-killed-by-police-in-sc/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Intercept

UPDATE:  The names of the two SLED agents that shot and killed Vamond Elmore are Lt. Craig Collier and Lt. Fred Powell.

UPDATE:  The Southern Inn was recently bought out.  It is now a Knight's Inn.