Showing posts with label false flag event. Show all posts
Showing posts with label false flag event. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 7, 2015

Plane Crash In South Carolina A False Flag Event

http://www.wmbfnews.com/story/29492717/officials-shaw-afb-pilot-in-f-16-crash-identified-still-in-hospital

You don't search for dead bodies in a highly localized crash.  The plane was on or rigged for autopilot and Major Aaron Johnson rammed it on purpose.

http://www.wsfa.com/story/29491579/f-16-cessna-crash-in-sc-after-midair-collision

Photo of exhaust section of F-16 was placed on the scene; any damage is not consistent with a fall from 3,000 feet. The exhaust section was placed there. 

http://wibqam.com/news/articles/2015/jul/07/us-military-jet-small-plane-collide-crash-in-south-carolina-media/

Ejected safely, huh?  Given that the story of the crash is bogus, the story of him having to eject from the plane is false as well.

Any "witness" testimony is false and the lines of crisis actors.

http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/Chinese_Customs/food_symbolism.htm

Seems to provide insight into the motives behind the fake plane crash.  Suggests the belief that President Obama (in charge of the military) and others will be successful in his war against God.


Thursday, June 18, 2015

Aangirfan: CHARLESTON CHURCH - FALSE FLAG CONSPIRACY

Aangirfan: CHARLESTON CHURCH - FALSE FLAG CONSPIRACY: Dylann Roof is from Eastover in South Carolina. Above, we see a medic with the South Carolina Army National Guard using moulage techni...

Mass Shooting In Charleston SC A Fake; Story Posted At Least On Jun 16

By:  Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent

CHARLESTON, SC -- (WorthyNews)  A shooting inside one of South Carolina's oldest black churches appears to be a false flag event.

At approximately 12:00 AM, June 18, a web posting on Yahoo! News stated there was a shooting at a historically black church in downtown Charleston.  This was "confirmed" by a news broadcast from wltx.com, Channel 19.1 out of Columbia, SC.

However, after typing in the search criteria, "shooting inside church in Charleston SC" on Firefox, multiple online news sources, including cnn.com, abcnews.go.com, pix11.com, and nydailynews.com, all report the same story, only they posted it to their web sites on June 16, 2015, a full day before it happened, which according to the official narrative, happened around 9 PM on June 17.  A copy of the link to the search results can be found here:  https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?ei=UTF-8&type=agc511&hspart=avast&hsimp=yhs-001&p=shooting+inside+church+in+Charleston+SC.

What is interesting to note is the fact that going to each of these different sites, they all say the posts were made on either the 17th or the 18th, which is today.  This means that the entire shooting was planned some days in advance, including any supposed victims, such as the pastor, Clementa Pinckney, and the supposed gunman, who according to police has not yet been caught.

While the ultimate intentions of these actions is not clear, it appears as though it is designed to cause racial tensions between blacks and whites.  Indeed, South Carolina, especially the Charleston area, is sensitive to racial tensions, especially in the days since Walter Scott, a black man, was shot and killed by a white police officer.

The implications are staggering.  This means that not only are the members of Mother Emanuel AME Church involved in this act of trying to incite a riot by inflaming racial tensions, but also members of the Charleston Police Department, and Charleston Mayor Joe Riley who supports the obviously false narrative given by CPD Chief Greg Mullen.  Even the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division and the Federal Bureau of Investigation appear to be in on the crime.

Truly, these are wicked times we are living in.

Source article:  http://news.yahoo.com/shooting-erupts-church-charleston-south-carolina-021744448.html#
Supporting articles:  http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/17/us/charleston-south-carolina-shooting/index.html, http://abcnews.go.com/US/police-respond-shooting-charleston-south-carolina-church/story?id=31845305, http://pix11.com/2015/06/17/police-respond-to-shooting-at-charleston-south-carolina-church/, http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/charleston-church-shot-article-1.2262014, http://abc7chicago.com/news/charleston-sc-police-respond-to-shooting-at-church/791575/, http://fox4kc.com/2015/06/17/shooting-reported-at-charleston-s-c-church/, http://koin.com/ap/shooting-in-downtown-charleston-south-carolina/, http://www.wxyz.com/news/multiple-people-shot-at-charleston-south-carolina-church

UPDATE:  While searching for crime scene photos of the fake "Charleston 9" shooting, I came across yet more websites that have the story printed before the shooting even happened.  Here's the link to the search results:  https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?ei=UTF-8&type=agc511&hspart=avast&hsimp=yhs-001&p=AP+photographer+at+Emanuel+AME+Church+after+shooting

Wednesday, March 18, 2015

Terror Attack In Tunisia A Government Sponsored Event

By:  Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent

Below is a commentary of a news article appearing at http://news.yahoo.com/reports-shots-fired-near-major-tunisian-museum-120932301.html.  This debunks the official story that

21 dead in attack on Tunisian museum; 2-3 gunmen at large

TUNIS, Tunisia (AP) -- Attackers opened fire Wednesday at a major museum in Tunisia's capital, gunning down 17 tourists as dozens more sprinted to safety. At least 21 people in all were killed, including two gunmen, but some attackers may have escaped, authorities said. (Classic government sponsored terror line designed to get people to be scared.)

The attack on the famed National Bardo Museum in Tunis was the first on a tourist site in years in Tunisia, a shaky young democracy that has struggled to keep Islamic extremist violence at bay.

It wasn't clear who the attackers were but security forces immediately flooded the area. Tunisia's parliament building, next to the museum, was evacuated. (If security forces flooded the area immediately, it means that they were anticipating the attack.  If they knew an attack was going to happen, why didn't they try to stop it?  Why let it get as big as it did?  It also stands to reason that if they knew the attak was going to happen, they might know the number of gunmen in the attack and the type/types of weapons going to be used.  If so, this indicates a desire on the part of Tunisian security forces to let the situation escalate such as it did, which implies that it may have had something to do with the planning of the attack.)

Private television Wataniya showed masked Tunisian security forces escorting dozens of tourists up nearby steps and away from the danger, as armed security forces pointed guns toward an adjacent building. Many elderly people, apparently tourists, ran in panic to safety, including at least one couple carrying two children. (That there is specific mention of a private television company on site as the 'incident' is in action suggests a money deal between the government of Tunisia and Wataniya, with Wataniya being complicit in this terrorist attack on its own people. An adjacent building - the parliament building perhaps? The mention of an elderly couple carrying children is sensationalism designed to evoke sympathy in the public and get them to not question the offical version of events.)

(Twitter photos showing hostages appear to be doctored.  There are no signs of fear, one woman looks as if she fell asleep, and the pictures were taken from inside the museum.  If there were really hostages being taken as the photos suggest, then there would be some fear on the part of the hostages.  There is none.  These people appear to be nothing more than crisis actors paid by their government to participate in said event.  This means that the Twitterers, especially Kristina Dei, are government plants.)

Tunisian Prime Minister Haib Essid said 21 people were killed: 17 tourists, two gunmen, a Tunisian security officer and a Tunisian cleaning woman. He said the dead tourists came from Italy, Poland, Germany and Spain.

He said two or three of the attackers remained at large.

Several other people were reported wounded in the attack, including three Poles and at least two Italians. The Italian Foreign Ministry said 100 other Italians had been taken to a secure location.

Some of the Italians at the museum were believed to have been passengers aboard the Costa Fascinosa, a cruise liner making a seven-day trip of the western Mediterranean that had docked in Tunis. Ship owner Costa Crociere confirmed that some of its 3,161 passengers were visiting the capital Wednesday and that a Bardo tour was on the itinerary, but said it couldn't confirm how many, if any, passengers were in the museum at the time.

The cruise ship recalled all the passengers to the ship and was in touch with local authorities and the Italian Foreign Ministry.

Wednesday's attack was a strong blow to Tunisia's efforts to revive its crucial tourism industry.

The National Bardo Museum, built in a 15th-century palace, is the alrgest museum in Tunisia and houses one of the world's largest collections of Roman mosaics among its 8,000 works. The museum is near the North African nation's parliament, 4 kilometers (2 1/2 miles) from the city center. A new wing with contemporary architecture was built as part of a 2009 renovation, doubling the surface area. (Both bards(Bardo) and Muses tell stories about the past.  This may have some significance.)

"It is not by chance that today's terrorism affects a country that represents hope for the Arab world. The hope for peace, the hope for stability, the hope for democracy. This hope must live," French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said in a statement minutes after the crisis ended. (Only minutes after the crisis ended?  This suggests that Mr. Fabius had his statement written out in advance.  It also suggests that he helped plan the supposed attack, which implicates the government of France in this psychological conditioning operation, (that people should willingly give up their rights and freedom for government owned "security",) for it can be called nothing else.)

Speaking at the Louvre museum to all for international efforts to preserve the heritage of Iraq and Syria against extremist destruction, French President Francois Hollande said he had called the Tunisian president to offer support and solidarity.

"Each time a terrorist crime is committed, we are all concerned," Hollande said. (It appears that President Francois Hollande of France is also part of the government sponsored attack.  Given that he is speaking on a "terrorist attack" on a museum while in a museum, and given the fact the the government of Tunisia, and possibly the Italian government, are involved, it seems that there may be more national leaders involved in the operation, which suggests funding on a massive international scale.  International bankers are people to look at, especially if they have been loaning large amounts of money to the governments mentioned in the above article.  This may be a down payment for service rendered.)

Tunisia recently completed a rocky road to democracy after overthrowing its authoritarian president in 2011, seen by many as the start of the so-called Arab Spring. The country has been more stable than other countries i the region, but has struggled with violence by Islamic extremists in recent years, including some linked to the Islamic State group. It also has extremists linked to al-Qaida's North Africa arm who occasionally target Tunisian security forces. (The Arab Spring was the start of World War III, which appears to pit the Muslim world against Christianity.  For certain, it is a staged event by some very rich people working behind the scenes, people who appear to be bent on world domination.)

A disproportionately large number of tunisian recruits -- some 3,000, according to government estimates -- have joined Islamic State fighters in Syria and Iraq.

The American Embassy in Tunis was attacked in September 2012, seriously damiging the embassy grounds and an adjoining American school. Four of the assailants were killed. Overall, though, the violence that Tunisia has seen in recent years has been largely focused on security forces, not foreigners or tourist sites.

The attack comes the day after Tunisian security officials confirmed the death in enighboring Libya of a leading suspect in Tunisian terror attacks and in the killings of two opposition figures in Tunisia. (This is a smoke-screen line designed to deflect from the truth that the government of Tunisia is behind the attack.  It does tell us that the attack was planned out many days in advance, possibly even involving the killing of the terrorist leader, which suggests that the government executed terror attack in Tunisia may have been planned in advance by months.)

Ahmed Rouissi gained the nickname of the "black box of terrorism." The information on his death was made public by security officials giving testimony in parliament and cited by the official TAP news agency. ("Black box of terrorism?" This suggests that Mr. Rouissi recorded the terror attacks of those in control, which means that he was not a leading source of terror, but possibly a government puppet whose final bit of usefulness came in the form of his sacrifice to the unholy desires of those he worked for, a.k.a. the governments of the world and the super-rich bankers, media moguls, and others who have the governments of the world on their payroll.)

Libya, which has devolved into chaos, is a source of major concern for Tunisia.

Also a major worry is the Mount Chaambi area on the border with Algeria where al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb has reportedly been helping a Tunisian group which has killed numerous soldiers.

---

Elaine Ganley and Jamey Keaten in Paris, Nicole Winfield in Rome, and Monika Scislowska in Warsaw, Poland, contributed to this report.