| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Showing posts with label NATO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NATO. Show all posts
Thursday, October 1, 2015
Fw: Defense-Update News for 10/01/2015
Sunday, August 23, 2015
Conspirators In Afghan Car Bomb Named
By: Marshall Ramsey II, WorthyNews U.S. Correspondent
The following story is taken verbatim from http://news.yahoo.com/nato-contractors-killed-kabul-car-bomb-identified-u-033750086.html. The commentary after certain sections are mine, as is the naming of the conspirators in the plot.)
NATO contractors killed by Kabul car bomb identified as U.S. citizens
KABUL (Reuters) - Three U.S. civilian contractors were among those killed by a car bomb that targeted their NATO convoy, the U.S.-led coalition in Afghanistan said, making the attack that killed 12 people one of the most lethal to target U.S. citizens in recent years.
The blast destroyed several vehicles, including a school van and an armored pick-up truck believed to be used by the contractors which was left twisted and blackened.
"One Resolute Support U.S. contractor was killed and two Resolute Support U.S. contractors died of wounds," the NATO coalition known as Resolute Support said in a statement late on Saturday.
(Too chatty to be legitimate. This statement was made by someone with something to hide, in this case, the people in command at Resolute Support. It also implicates NATO officials as Resolute Support is a division of NATO.)
Security sources said the contractors worked for U.S. company DynCorp International. The company, which provides training, security and aviation maintenance to the NATO mission and the Afghan military, confirmed it was the target.
(How cold they manage to confirm they were the target if no one claimed responsibility? This suggests that they know more than they are letting on. More likely this is a false flag event.)
"A DynCorp International vehicle carrying members of our team was tragically attacked," the company said in statement. It gave no more details.
The suicide attack outside a hospital on a residential street at rush hour killed mainly Afghan civilians and injured scores more, heightening the anger felt in Kabul after a string of deadly blasts that killed dozens this month.
(Scores more? This is not a very commonly used term. It seems to have a religious connotation, and could possibly be used to foment religious violence and possibly war.)
The Taliban, fighting to re-establish hard-line Islamist rule more than 13 years after the U.S.-led military intervention that toppled their regime, denied they was behind the attack. No group has claimed responsibility.
("They WAS behind the attack?" Any journalist/reporter would know that you don't say "they was" behind the attack. The correct terminology would be, "They WERE behind the attack." This is a planted story and the reporter an Illuminati employee. Frank Jack Daniel and Nick Macfie are co-conspirators.)
The U.S. embassy in Kabul condemned the bombing.
"The United States remains committed to assisting our Afghan partners in their efforts to ensure a peaceful future," it said in a statement.
The violence has strained Afghanistan's ties with neighbor Pakistan, with Afghan President Ashraf Ghani accusing the Pakistan government of not doing enough to stop militants planning attacks from training camps he says lie across the border.
The official anger has spilled on to the streets, with protests against Pakistan's alleged involvement in the recent bloodshed, including people burning the Pakistani flag and a campaign to boycott Pakistani products.
(Official anger? This should mean fake, paid anger, fake, paid anger that was purposefully spilled onto the streets.)
Saturday's blast blew glass blown out of the windows of the Shinozada hospital and a six-storey building opposite. On its website, the Shinozada is described as Afghanistan's first private hospital.
(Reporting by Frank Jack Daniel; Editing by Nick Macfie)
The following story is taken verbatim from http://news.yahoo.com/nato-contractors-killed-kabul-car-bomb-identified-u-033750086.html. The commentary after certain sections are mine, as is the naming of the conspirators in the plot.)
NATO contractors killed by Kabul car bomb identified as U.S. citizens
KABUL (Reuters) - Three U.S. civilian contractors were among those killed by a car bomb that targeted their NATO convoy, the U.S.-led coalition in Afghanistan said, making the attack that killed 12 people one of the most lethal to target U.S. citizens in recent years.
The blast destroyed several vehicles, including a school van and an armored pick-up truck believed to be used by the contractors which was left twisted and blackened.
"One Resolute Support U.S. contractor was killed and two Resolute Support U.S. contractors died of wounds," the NATO coalition known as Resolute Support said in a statement late on Saturday.
(Too chatty to be legitimate. This statement was made by someone with something to hide, in this case, the people in command at Resolute Support. It also implicates NATO officials as Resolute Support is a division of NATO.)
Security sources said the contractors worked for U.S. company DynCorp International. The company, which provides training, security and aviation maintenance to the NATO mission and the Afghan military, confirmed it was the target.
(How cold they manage to confirm they were the target if no one claimed responsibility? This suggests that they know more than they are letting on. More likely this is a false flag event.)
"A DynCorp International vehicle carrying members of our team was tragically attacked," the company said in statement. It gave no more details.
The suicide attack outside a hospital on a residential street at rush hour killed mainly Afghan civilians and injured scores more, heightening the anger felt in Kabul after a string of deadly blasts that killed dozens this month.
(Scores more? This is not a very commonly used term. It seems to have a religious connotation, and could possibly be used to foment religious violence and possibly war.)
The Taliban, fighting to re-establish hard-line Islamist rule more than 13 years after the U.S.-led military intervention that toppled their regime, denied they was behind the attack. No group has claimed responsibility.
("They WAS behind the attack?" Any journalist/reporter would know that you don't say "they was" behind the attack. The correct terminology would be, "They WERE behind the attack." This is a planted story and the reporter an Illuminati employee. Frank Jack Daniel and Nick Macfie are co-conspirators.)
The U.S. embassy in Kabul condemned the bombing.
"The United States remains committed to assisting our Afghan partners in their efforts to ensure a peaceful future," it said in a statement.
The violence has strained Afghanistan's ties with neighbor Pakistan, with Afghan President Ashraf Ghani accusing the Pakistan government of not doing enough to stop militants planning attacks from training camps he says lie across the border.
The official anger has spilled on to the streets, with protests against Pakistan's alleged involvement in the recent bloodshed, including people burning the Pakistani flag and a campaign to boycott Pakistani products.
(Official anger? This should mean fake, paid anger, fake, paid anger that was purposefully spilled onto the streets.)
Saturday's blast blew glass blown out of the windows of the Shinozada hospital and a six-storey building opposite. On its website, the Shinozada is described as Afghanistan's first private hospital.
(Reporting by Frank Jack Daniel; Editing by Nick Macfie)
Car bombing of NATO contractors a fake
You don't post breaking news more than a day in advance and expect it to be believed.
https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?ei=UTF-8&type=avastbcl&hspart=avast&hsimp=yhs-001&p=NATO+contractors+killed+in+car+bomb
https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?ei=UTF-8&type=avastbcl&hspart=avast&hsimp=yhs-001&p=NATO+contractors+killed+in+car+bomb
Monday, February 24, 2014
Russia-NATO To Share Security Detail Of the Cape Ray; Suspected Illegal Weapons Transfer
By: Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent
WASHINGTON, D.C. - (Worthy News) Russia and NATO drawing up plans for joint naval operation in the Mediterranean. Purpose is to protect the MV Cape Ray from attack by potential hostile forces.
Originally scheduled to meet the Ark Futura, a Dutch vessel, in the Mediterranean Sea to receive a shipment of chemical weapons from them. Plans changed, now the pick up location is Gioia Tauro, Italy. Cape Ray current position according to last available coordinates put it between northern Mozambique and Madagascar
According to online sources, The MV Cape Ray's port of destination is Singapore, with an arrival date of March 6. This conflicts with the destination given of Italy as the pick up and transfer location.
The fact that discussions are on-going concerning a joint military task force gives strength to an earlier report that President Obama was attempting to acquire chemical weapons from Syria for use in U.S. drone strikes. However, with no wars going on to necessitate the use of such weapons, one can only speculate as to the intended targets.
Although many would be unwilling to admit this, it may be that the intended targets of the drone strikes are American citizens and infrastructure, given a recent story about the United States Department of Homeland Security being contracted to purchase more than 700 million rounds of ammunition of varying types over the next four years. Indeed, it seemly likely, especially since NATO (which is headed by the United States) and Russia are in negotiations on joint security measures regarding the protection of the Cape Ray, and that it is being hailed as a good sign.
Another possibility is that Russia has purchased some of these chemical weapons supposedly being destroyed. According to an article put out by Reuters, Russia has invested "heavily" in the "disarmament" agreement. It almost certainly means that Russia has spent a large amount of money in acquiring these chemical, and possibly biological, weapons, and it is unlikely that such a heavy investment would be merely to destroy them.
The original date set for the transfer of Syria's chemical weapons stockpile was Feb. 6. Due to a nearly one month delay, the new deadline for transfer of Syria chemical weapons to the United States is March 1.
“Most of the chemical weapons stockpiles, including the most toxic materials, will be evacuated from Syria by March 1,” Syria’s ambassador to Russia, Riad Haddad, told the Interfax news agency. “I believe we will meet the deadline," he said.
The cause of the delay may be due to a story first broken in January, where it was revealed that the MV Cape Ray was already underway in the Caribbean sea, intending to rendezvous with Dutch and Norwegian ships to take possession of the chemical weapons. It also revealed that the chemical weapons were to be used in joint military actions around the world and in "combination forces," that is, two or more countries combining their armed forces and operating as a single entity.
Another conflict arises. The MV Cape Ray is scheduled to be in Singapore on March 8, 2014. According to Syria, most of their chemical weapons stockpile will be removed by March 1, less than one week away. Even if they manage to meet this deadline, the chemicals must still be transferred to the Cape Ray. It must then travel to the end of the Mediterranean sea, enter and exit the Red sea, and then make it to Singapore. This seems highly unlikely given the extreme care which must be given in handling weapons of this kind.
The question now must be asked, "Who are the weapons really being given to?" Reuters gives the following statement regarding the cooperation between NATO and Russian forces:
"NATO and Russian warships would provide strong protection to a ship carrying some of the world's most dangerous cargo."
Official statements say that the Cape Ray will be carrying the chemical weapons. If this is the case, then why was their no mention of the Cape Ray in the above quote? Could it be possible that the authors of the article have information regarding the real identity of the ship to be handling Syria's chemical weapons? It is possible.
In a related article published Feb. 11, The Obama Administration admitted to wrestling with a decision to kill a United States citizen with a drone strike. The Obama administration gave the information to both CBS News and the Associated Press (AP) the identity of the country in which the drone strike would take place, yet asked them not to reveal the location because officials believed publishing it "could interrupt ongoing counterterror operations."
So what we have here is a clear case of the transfer of chemical weapons from one nation to another under the cover of chemical weapons disposal. Such an act is considered illegal under the Chemical Weapons Convention, ratified by the United States in 1993, which prohibits the "development, production, acquisition, stockpiling, retention, and transfer or use of chemical weapons."
WASHINGTON, D.C. - (Worthy News) Russia and NATO drawing up plans for joint naval operation in the Mediterranean. Purpose is to protect the MV Cape Ray from attack by potential hostile forces.
Originally scheduled to meet the Ark Futura, a Dutch vessel, in the Mediterranean Sea to receive a shipment of chemical weapons from them. Plans changed, now the pick up location is Gioia Tauro, Italy. Cape Ray current position according to last available coordinates put it between northern Mozambique and Madagascar
According to online sources, The MV Cape Ray's port of destination is Singapore, with an arrival date of March 6. This conflicts with the destination given of Italy as the pick up and transfer location.
The fact that discussions are on-going concerning a joint military task force gives strength to an earlier report that President Obama was attempting to acquire chemical weapons from Syria for use in U.S. drone strikes. However, with no wars going on to necessitate the use of such weapons, one can only speculate as to the intended targets.
Although many would be unwilling to admit this, it may be that the intended targets of the drone strikes are American citizens and infrastructure, given a recent story about the United States Department of Homeland Security being contracted to purchase more than 700 million rounds of ammunition of varying types over the next four years. Indeed, it seemly likely, especially since NATO (which is headed by the United States) and Russia are in negotiations on joint security measures regarding the protection of the Cape Ray, and that it is being hailed as a good sign.
Another possibility is that Russia has purchased some of these chemical weapons supposedly being destroyed. According to an article put out by Reuters, Russia has invested "heavily" in the "disarmament" agreement. It almost certainly means that Russia has spent a large amount of money in acquiring these chemical, and possibly biological, weapons, and it is unlikely that such a heavy investment would be merely to destroy them.
The original date set for the transfer of Syria's chemical weapons stockpile was Feb. 6. Due to a nearly one month delay, the new deadline for transfer of Syria chemical weapons to the United States is March 1.
“Most of the chemical weapons stockpiles, including the most toxic materials, will be evacuated from Syria by March 1,” Syria’s ambassador to Russia, Riad Haddad, told the Interfax news agency. “I believe we will meet the deadline," he said.
The cause of the delay may be due to a story first broken in January, where it was revealed that the MV Cape Ray was already underway in the Caribbean sea, intending to rendezvous with Dutch and Norwegian ships to take possession of the chemical weapons. It also revealed that the chemical weapons were to be used in joint military actions around the world and in "combination forces," that is, two or more countries combining their armed forces and operating as a single entity.
Another conflict arises. The MV Cape Ray is scheduled to be in Singapore on March 8, 2014. According to Syria, most of their chemical weapons stockpile will be removed by March 1, less than one week away. Even if they manage to meet this deadline, the chemicals must still be transferred to the Cape Ray. It must then travel to the end of the Mediterranean sea, enter and exit the Red sea, and then make it to Singapore. This seems highly unlikely given the extreme care which must be given in handling weapons of this kind.
The question now must be asked, "Who are the weapons really being given to?" Reuters gives the following statement regarding the cooperation between NATO and Russian forces:
"NATO and Russian warships would provide strong protection to a ship carrying some of the world's most dangerous cargo."
Official statements say that the Cape Ray will be carrying the chemical weapons. If this is the case, then why was their no mention of the Cape Ray in the above quote? Could it be possible that the authors of the article have information regarding the real identity of the ship to be handling Syria's chemical weapons? It is possible.
In a related article published Feb. 11, The Obama Administration admitted to wrestling with a decision to kill a United States citizen with a drone strike. The Obama administration gave the information to both CBS News and the Associated Press (AP) the identity of the country in which the drone strike would take place, yet asked them not to reveal the location because officials believed publishing it "could interrupt ongoing counterterror operations."
So what we have here is a clear case of the transfer of chemical weapons from one nation to another under the cover of chemical weapons disposal. Such an act is considered illegal under the Chemical Weapons Convention, ratified by the United States in 1993, which prohibits the "development, production, acquisition, stockpiling, retention, and transfer or use of chemical weapons."
Saturday, June 29, 2013
Fw: DEBKA Newsletter, June 28, 2013 - World War III Update
| ||||||
21 June Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Thursday, June 20, that Moscow will honor its controversial contract to deliver S-300 air defense missile systems to Syria. He spoke the day after the announcement that two warships carrying 600 Russian marines were heading for Syria "to protect the Russian citizens there" along with air force cover "as needed." DEBKAfile: Russia and the West are pumping more arms into Syria for the decisive battle for Aleppo between the HIzballah-backed Syrian army and heavily mobilized rebel forces.
22 June. DEBKAfile reveals that Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan informed President Barack Obama Wednesday, June 19, of his sudden decision to shut down the Turkish corridor for the transfer of US and NATO arms to the Syrian rebels. He said he was afraid of Russian retribution. He leaves the Syrian rebels fighting in Aleppo virtually high and dry.
24 June. After months of relative calm, the pro-Iran Palestinian Jihad Islami fired 6 Grad missiles at Beersheba and Ashkelon from the Gaza Strip before dawn Tuesday. There were no casualties. DEBKAfile: The attack came after Hamas special forces liquidated Jihad's missile commander Sunday, June 23, amid a violent feud with Jihad. Two of the four Grads were intercepted by Iron Dome. The Israeli air force hit back against Hamas weapons caches in the central Gaza Strip region and a rocket firing pit in the south.
24 June. Egypt is lurching toward a "low intensity civil war." Law and order is breaking down as armed gangs attack governors and burn emblems of government, and Muslim Brotherhood uses armed men to strike back. Neither the police nor the army has interfered to date. Army chief Abdel-Fattah al-Sissi promised Sunday, June 23, to preserve "the will of the people" from attack, without defining which side was "the people." The opposition plans to launch Egypt's third revolution in three years in massive June 30 demonstrations against President Morsi.
25 June. A logistics base for handling tanks, missile systems and self-propelled artillery bound for Syria and Hizballah is secretly under construction at Port Sudan, DEBKAfile reports exclusively. Iranian Revolutionary Guards engineers in civilian dress are overseeing the hundreds of Sudanese workmen laboring flat out to build Iran's second Red Sea base after Assab in South Eritrea. It is designed to handle Iran's largest warships and submarines with a large arms depot that will cut in half the sea route for Iranian heavy arms to reach Iran's Syrian and Hizballah allies through the Suez Canal.
26 June: The US and Russia are coming to blows, leaving the Syrian conflict to spread unabated into widening circles of cross-border and internecine Muslim violence. This also impinges on a secret US-Iranian nuclear dialogue. DEBKAfile's intelligence watchers foresee escalating violence focusing on the battle for Aleppo in the next five months up until the US and Russian presidents meet again in September.
26 June: Moscow announced Wednesday June 26, the evacuation of all Russian military and diplomatic personnel from Syria, including its naval base at Tartus, "for fear of an incident involving the Russian military that could have larger consequences," said a defense ministry official in Moscow. A 16-ship naval task force remains in the eastern Mediterranean. An unannounced Israeli war maneuver was conducted on the Golan.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)