Manufactured Climate Consensus Deemed False By Climate Scientist – ‘The Time For Debate Has Ended’
Lilli Keeve, OPlaneta
There has been an «overwhelming scientific consensus» that global warming is being caused by humans, a statement supported by fact-check articles.
However, many climate scientists have challenged this slogan in the past few years.
One of these scientists is renowned 2022 Nobel Prize winner and physicist Dr. John Clauser. Recently, he stated that there is no man-made global warming crisis. John Coleman, a fellow scientist and Weather Channel founder, agreed with his belief that «there is no significant man-made global warming.»
Georgia Institute of Technology’s Judith Curry, an American climatologist, affirms that the man-made climate crisis is «manufactured.» Her research on hurricanes, remote sensing, atmospheric modeling, climate models, and more has spanned decades and has been published in over one hundred scientific papers.
According to Curry, there’s been an «overwhelming consensus» over this untrue slogan which scientists have pursued «fame and fortune» over. The scientists who research global warming created by humans are more likely to be acknowledged and quoted by popular culture. They are also more likely to be akin to celebrities and given large grants from the federal government.
As a result, «climate hysteria» was born and adopted by the public, but Curry isn’t buying it. She shared: “I was adopted by the environmental advocacy groups and the alarmists and I was treated like a rock star. Flown all over the place to meet with politicians. Like a good scientist, I investigated.”
She said that «ugly things» have been performed by alarmist scientists to further their narrative about global warming, which is all politically driven. Take, for example, the notorious «Climategate scandal.» It revealed that certain scientists weren’t sharing data and privately admitting in exposed emails that the planet isn’t in a climate crisis.
«Avoiding Freedom of Information Act requests» was one of these «ugly things.» She also says that there is a «climate change industry» that champions alarmism.
U.N. officials, according to Curry, were motivated by «anti-capitalism. They hated the oil companies and seized on the climate change issue to move their policies along.» She continued: “The IPCC (the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was created by the U.N.) wasn’t supposed to focus on any benefits of warming. The IPCC’s mandate was to look for dangerous human-caused climate change.”
Curry’s thoughts don’t stop there. “Then the national funding agencies directed all the funding … assuming there are dangerous impacts,” she said. “The editor of the journal Science wrote this political rant. The time for debate has ended.”
“What kind of message does that give?” Curry further adds. “Promote the alarming papers! Don’t even send the other ones out for review. If you wanted to advance in your career, like be at a prestigious university and get a big salary, have big laboratory space, get lots of grant funding, be director of an institute, there was clearly one path to go.”
No comments:
Post a Comment