Nuclear Detonation In Charleston Harbor? Sen. Graham Thinks So.
By: Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent
CHARLESTON, SC - (WorthyNews) It may be about to get really warm in Charleston if U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham is correct.
On September 3, 2013, Senator Graham addressed a home crowd in Goose Creek, SC, on Tuesday regarding the ongioing civil war in Syria. Sen. Graham told reporters that taking action on Syria is not a question of whether or not we should, but how bad do we want the consequences of our actions, or inactions, to be.
He stated that if there is no U.S. response (meaning an attack on Syria by U.S. forces), then Iran will not believe the United States' resolve to block Iran from getting nuclear weapons in the hands of terrorists, and those terrorists detonating a nuclear device in Charleston Harbor.
"I believe that if we get Syria wrong, within six months - and you can quote me on this - there will be a war between Iran and Israel over their nuclear program," Graham said. "It won't come to America on top of a missile, it'll come in the belly of a ship in the Charleston or New York Harbor."
According to Senator Graham's own statements, he has advanced knowledge of a potential nuclear attack on America. According to Senator Graham, the only way to stop this nuclear attack on the U.S. is to attack the nation of Syria. This leaves some very disturbing conclusions to draw.
Conclusion #1: The United States of America is being extorted by the government of Iran. With the United States' vastly superior military might, we could destroy Iran off the map within a couple of days; so the only conclusion to be drawn here is that the United States government under President Obama wants it this way. It also means that President Obama stands to profit in some manner from a nuclear attack on the United States.
Conclusion #2: Senator Graham, while having direct personal knowledge of a forth-coming nuclear attack, is refusing to consider a preemptive strike against the Iranians. This also suggests that he stands to profit in some manner from an attack on the United States of America.
Conclusion #3: Given the unfortunately likely scenarios addressed in conclusions 1 & 2, it presents a third conclusion, one far more terrifying that a nuclear strike: That the safety and security of the people of the Untied States of America is for sale to the highest bidder.
My grandfather told me something when I was a young man: "A Western businessman will sell you the rope you are going to use to hang him with." Although this isn't a situation dealing with American businessmen, it is actually much worse: The leaders the people of the United States of America elect to public office, expecting them to protect us from outside aggression, are for sale to the highest bidder. Does this mean that all politicians are able to be bribed, and therefore treasonous? No. But the above article, combined with known bribery attempts during the passage of the Affordable Care Act, a.k.a. Obamacare, does suggest that there are some, if not a lot, who would do such a thing. The only question is: How far does the corruption go?
Time is almost up for Senator Graham's words to be prophetic. As it happens, there are two Iranian warships headed toward the U.S. coast. Although the names of the ships are unknown at this time, we do know that one is an Iranian destroyer and the other is a logistics helicopter carrier. It is being billed as a training mission, one that would give them technical knowledge of our coastline and our response to perceived threats. With this data, the Iranians could conceivably put together a plan whereby they could detonate a nuclear weapon on American soil.
These are dark days for the United States of America. Neither Charleston nor New York harbors appear to be safe. Who will save us, or will our leaders sell us out for a few Syrian pounds or some Iranian rials? God help us.
By: Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent
CHARLESTON, SC - (WorthyNews) It may be about to get really warm in Charleston if U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham is correct.
On September 3, 2013, Senator Graham addressed a home crowd in Goose Creek, SC, on Tuesday regarding the ongioing civil war in Syria. Sen. Graham told reporters that taking action on Syria is not a question of whether or not we should, but how bad do we want the consequences of our actions, or inactions, to be.
He stated that if there is no U.S. response (meaning an attack on Syria by U.S. forces), then Iran will not believe the United States' resolve to block Iran from getting nuclear weapons in the hands of terrorists, and those terrorists detonating a nuclear device in Charleston Harbor.
"I believe that if we get Syria wrong, within six months - and you can quote me on this - there will be a war between Iran and Israel over their nuclear program," Graham said. "It won't come to America on top of a missile, it'll come in the belly of a ship in the Charleston or New York Harbor."
According to Senator Graham's own statements, he has advanced knowledge of a potential nuclear attack on America. According to Senator Graham, the only way to stop this nuclear attack on the U.S. is to attack the nation of Syria. This leaves some very disturbing conclusions to draw.
Conclusion #1: The United States of America is being extorted by the government of Iran. With the United States' vastly superior military might, we could destroy Iran off the map within a couple of days; so the only conclusion to be drawn here is that the United States government under President Obama wants it this way. It also means that President Obama stands to profit in some manner from a nuclear attack on the United States.
Conclusion #2: Senator Graham, while having direct personal knowledge of a forth-coming nuclear attack, is refusing to consider a preemptive strike against the Iranians. This also suggests that he stands to profit in some manner from an attack on the United States of America.
Conclusion #3: Given the unfortunately likely scenarios addressed in conclusions 1 & 2, it presents a third conclusion, one far more terrifying that a nuclear strike: That the safety and security of the people of the Untied States of America is for sale to the highest bidder.
My grandfather told me something when I was a young man: "A Western businessman will sell you the rope you are going to use to hang him with." Although this isn't a situation dealing with American businessmen, it is actually much worse: The leaders the people of the United States of America elect to public office, expecting them to protect us from outside aggression, are for sale to the highest bidder. Does this mean that all politicians are able to be bribed, and therefore treasonous? No. But the above article, combined with known bribery attempts during the passage of the Affordable Care Act, a.k.a. Obamacare, does suggest that there are some, if not a lot, who would do such a thing. The only question is: How far does the corruption go?
Time is almost up for Senator Graham's words to be prophetic. As it happens, there are two Iranian warships headed toward the U.S. coast. Although the names of the ships are unknown at this time, we do know that one is an Iranian destroyer and the other is a logistics helicopter carrier. It is being billed as a training mission, one that would give them technical knowledge of our coastline and our response to perceived threats. With this data, the Iranians could conceivably put together a plan whereby they could detonate a nuclear weapon on American soil.
These are dark days for the United States of America. Neither Charleston nor New York harbors appear to be safe. Who will save us, or will our leaders sell us out for a few Syrian pounds or some Iranian rials? God help us.
Source articles:
No comments:
Post a Comment