By: Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The U.S. is protesting an intercept of a U.S. reconnaissance plane by a Russian fighter jet last week, calling it "unsafe and unprofessional" amid what it views as increasingly aggressive air operations by Moscow.
(Facts: U.S. protesting intercept of one of its reconnaissance planes by a Russian fighter jet last week; is being called unsafe and unprofessional.)
Pentagon spokesman Mark Wright on Sunday said the U.S. was filing a complaint to Russia after the April 7 incident over the Baltic Sea.
(Facts: Incident happened on April 7, 2015; U.S. filing a complaint to Russian government, according to Mark Wright, Pentagon spokesman.)
Russian officials have denied their pilot did anything wrong, according to several news reports.
(Facts: Russia denies wrongdoing in incident; does not deny the incident happened.)
According to the Pentagon, the U.S. RC-135U plane was flying in international airspace north of Poland. U.S. officials say a Russian SU-27 fighter intercepted the U.S. aircraft at a high rate of speed from the rear, and then proceeded to conduct two more passes using "unsafe and unprofessional maneuvers" in clsoe proximity.
(Facts: Plane was an RC-135U; intercepting plane was a Russian SU-27 fighter jet; fighter jet first intercepted U.S. plane from rear; two more passes made using "unsafe and unprofessional maneuvers" in close proximity)
(Statement by Mr. Wright of "unsafe and unprofessional maneuvers" suggests the intercept was expected by the Pentagon, which in turn suggests the actions of the Russian pilot was agreed upon by both the Russian government under Vladimir Putin and the U.S. government under President Obama. This makes the nature of the protest merely a cover story designed to dissuade the reader from a greater issue, which appears to be the imminent attack of Russian forces on American soil.)
"Unprofessioinal air intercepts have the potential to cause harm to all aircrews involved. More importantly, the careless actions of a single pilot have the potential to escalate tensions between countries," Wright said.
(Facts: The intercept was called unprofessional. It occurred in international waters, which, technically, makes it illegal as both the U.S. and Russia are members of the United Nations; since the intercept was expected to have happened, the statement by Mr. Wright should be regarded as 'shock-and-awe,' a false statement designed to evoke emotion from the reader and dampen critical thinking skills.
(Mr. Wright's statement, "the careless actions of a single pilot," should also be regarded as false, and thus criminal in nature, as the intercept and the cover story were both approved by the U.S. government not only as an attack on the morale of the citizens of the United States of America but also part of a larger conspiracy with the Russian government to make the United States of America vulnerable to military attack.)
"This air activity takes place in the context of a changed security environment in view of Russia's aggression against Ukraine," he said.
(Facts: The intercept of the American reconnaissance plane stems directly from altered security procedures; these security procedures were changed as a result of Russia's aggression against Ukraine.
(Russia's aggression in the past weeks and months have not only been against Ukraine, but against other nations as well, including Ireland. From the available data, one can only conclude that the security procedures set forth by the United States of America and European nations have changed not to make America and Europe more secure, but less. This means that an agreement between the U.S., Russia, and various European nations has existed since the time of Russia's assault on Ukraine. It now raises the possibility that the United Nations knows about the deal between the U.S. and Russia and is possibly a participant with them.)
It isn't the first time the U.S. has protested to Moscow what it considered to be an unsafe intercept. Last April, a Russian fighter jet intercepted a U.S. reconnaissance plane in international airspace over the Sea of Okhotsk.
(Fact: The Russian military attack on the satellite nation of Ukraine first took place in February 2014. In April 2014, another American reconnaissance plane was intercepted by Russian military aircraft. Since we know that there exists an agreement between the United States and Russia in favor of increased Russian aggression against the United States, we must conclude that the 2014 intercept was also part of the agreement. This means that before late February 2014, a meeting between U.S., Russian, European, and possibly UN, officials took place to discuss the terms of Russia's attack on Ukraine and their increased aggression against both European and American air craft and air space. Indeed, a series of meetings did take place in 2013 between the United States and Russia regarding Syria.
(On August 9, 2013, a 2+2 meeting took place between Homeland Security Secretary Chuck Hagel, Secretary of State John Kerry, Russian Minister of Defense Sergey Shoygu, and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in Washington, D.C. to discuss "strategic stability, missile defense, political-military cooperation, and regional security." Since both Ukraine and the US are next door neighbors to Russia, a deal between the two countries certainly could have taken place at that time for the permittance of Russia's increased aggression and the purposeful lack of response by the United States and its European, and thus, NATO, and UN, allies.)
Source article: http://news.yahoo.com/us-protests-intercept-reconnaissance-plane-russia-040542666.html
Reference articles: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014%E2%80%9315_Russian_military_intervention_in_Ukraine
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2013/08/213031.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Shoygu
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Lavrov
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The U.S. is protesting an intercept of a U.S. reconnaissance plane by a Russian fighter jet last week, calling it "unsafe and unprofessional" amid what it views as increasingly aggressive air operations by Moscow.
(Facts: U.S. protesting intercept of one of its reconnaissance planes by a Russian fighter jet last week; is being called unsafe and unprofessional.)
Pentagon spokesman Mark Wright on Sunday said the U.S. was filing a complaint to Russia after the April 7 incident over the Baltic Sea.
(Facts: Incident happened on April 7, 2015; U.S. filing a complaint to Russian government, according to Mark Wright, Pentagon spokesman.)
Russian officials have denied their pilot did anything wrong, according to several news reports.
(Facts: Russia denies wrongdoing in incident; does not deny the incident happened.)
According to the Pentagon, the U.S. RC-135U plane was flying in international airspace north of Poland. U.S. officials say a Russian SU-27 fighter intercepted the U.S. aircraft at a high rate of speed from the rear, and then proceeded to conduct two more passes using "unsafe and unprofessional maneuvers" in clsoe proximity.
(Facts: Plane was an RC-135U; intercepting plane was a Russian SU-27 fighter jet; fighter jet first intercepted U.S. plane from rear; two more passes made using "unsafe and unprofessional maneuvers" in close proximity)
(Statement by Mr. Wright of "unsafe and unprofessional maneuvers" suggests the intercept was expected by the Pentagon, which in turn suggests the actions of the Russian pilot was agreed upon by both the Russian government under Vladimir Putin and the U.S. government under President Obama. This makes the nature of the protest merely a cover story designed to dissuade the reader from a greater issue, which appears to be the imminent attack of Russian forces on American soil.)
"Unprofessioinal air intercepts have the potential to cause harm to all aircrews involved. More importantly, the careless actions of a single pilot have the potential to escalate tensions between countries," Wright said.
(Facts: The intercept was called unprofessional. It occurred in international waters, which, technically, makes it illegal as both the U.S. and Russia are members of the United Nations; since the intercept was expected to have happened, the statement by Mr. Wright should be regarded as 'shock-and-awe,' a false statement designed to evoke emotion from the reader and dampen critical thinking skills.
(Mr. Wright's statement, "the careless actions of a single pilot," should also be regarded as false, and thus criminal in nature, as the intercept and the cover story were both approved by the U.S. government not only as an attack on the morale of the citizens of the United States of America but also part of a larger conspiracy with the Russian government to make the United States of America vulnerable to military attack.)
"This air activity takes place in the context of a changed security environment in view of Russia's aggression against Ukraine," he said.
(Facts: The intercept of the American reconnaissance plane stems directly from altered security procedures; these security procedures were changed as a result of Russia's aggression against Ukraine.
(Russia's aggression in the past weeks and months have not only been against Ukraine, but against other nations as well, including Ireland. From the available data, one can only conclude that the security procedures set forth by the United States of America and European nations have changed not to make America and Europe more secure, but less. This means that an agreement between the U.S., Russia, and various European nations has existed since the time of Russia's assault on Ukraine. It now raises the possibility that the United Nations knows about the deal between the U.S. and Russia and is possibly a participant with them.)
It isn't the first time the U.S. has protested to Moscow what it considered to be an unsafe intercept. Last April, a Russian fighter jet intercepted a U.S. reconnaissance plane in international airspace over the Sea of Okhotsk.
(Fact: The Russian military attack on the satellite nation of Ukraine first took place in February 2014. In April 2014, another American reconnaissance plane was intercepted by Russian military aircraft. Since we know that there exists an agreement between the United States and Russia in favor of increased Russian aggression against the United States, we must conclude that the 2014 intercept was also part of the agreement. This means that before late February 2014, a meeting between U.S., Russian, European, and possibly UN, officials took place to discuss the terms of Russia's attack on Ukraine and their increased aggression against both European and American air craft and air space. Indeed, a series of meetings did take place in 2013 between the United States and Russia regarding Syria.
(On August 9, 2013, a 2+2 meeting took place between Homeland Security Secretary Chuck Hagel, Secretary of State John Kerry, Russian Minister of Defense Sergey Shoygu, and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in Washington, D.C. to discuss "strategic stability, missile defense, political-military cooperation, and regional security." Since both Ukraine and the US are next door neighbors to Russia, a deal between the two countries certainly could have taken place at that time for the permittance of Russia's increased aggression and the purposeful lack of response by the United States and its European, and thus, NATO, and UN, allies.)
Source article: http://news.yahoo.com/us-protests-intercept-reconnaissance-plane-russia-040542666.html
Reference articles: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014%E2%80%9315_Russian_military_intervention_in_Ukraine
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2013/08/213031.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Shoygu
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Lavrov
No comments:
Post a Comment