Miracle Baby Rescued from an Icy Utah River is a Hoax
The miracle baby rescue, that claim of the saving of the life of a baby trapped in a turned over car in an icy Utah river, is a hoax. There is no other possibility.
It is yet another arch-Zionist DHS-inspired stage, a fake, which is readily proven. Traffic was diverted in the DHS-style set up; it was all planned well in advance.
The hoax can be fully confirmed by the chief story lines, some of which are inane beyond belief. One of these most ridiculous story lines relates to the hearing of voices by rescue workers. Why do they need to hear voices, which they claimed as a motivation? They see a turned over car. What purpose would those 'voices' serve? Per the DailyMail:
The four officers who rescued an 18-month-old toddler from the wreck of a submerged car on Sunday said they launched into their heroics when they heard desperate pleas for help coming from a woman inside. But when the four men used all their strength to right the red Dodge sedan, they found little Lily Groesbeck to be the only passenger left alive in the vehicle.
Her mother, 25-year-old Lynn Jennifer Groesbeck, had passed away the night before when she lost control of the car and could not possibly have called for the men to help save her child.
'For two nights I've laid awake trying to figure out exactly what it could be. All I know is it was there, we all heard it,' Spanish Fork Police Officer Tyler Beddoes said. 'It was extra motivation.'
NOTE: No one can believe this to be anything other than a staged act, a pure arch-fabrication: a terminally corrupt hoax.
It is also said that a good Samaritan played a key role:
A fisherman discovered the wreck about 12:30 p.m. Saturday in Utah's Spanish Fork River, about 14 hours after the accident. He found the baby upside down, still strapped in a car seat.
NOTE: He supposedly made the initial discovery of a dead Lynn Groesbeck, along with the hanging from her seat daughter, Lynn Jennifer Groesbeck.
How does anyone know it was 14 hours later? More importantly, how did the car get there? Did it catapult from the bridge all the way down? There were no skid marks on that pavement, per the StandardSpeaker, "there were no skid marks," yet it is said that the car skidded and somehow crashed into the creek? How, just how? Moreover, who is this fisherman? Let him make his face and words public.
There is no possibility of a real car accident with a car that skidded on the pavement, smashed into an abutment, and then toppled over a bridge without a trail of evidence. It is minus-1o a trail, nothing is seen.
There is no ice, here. It's relatively shallow. In this image no evidence of a submerged or half-submerged car can be seen. Supposedly, the car was turned upright by firemen. There is no evidence for this. In fact, what does it look like? It looks like the car was simply lowered there by the fire department or other DHS-associated entities:
No comments:
Post a Comment